- Thread starter Lowlight
- Start date
The side panels will be OD Green on all the first run of chassis
We will offer FDE and grey side panels (they are back-orderable on the website now) and probably more colours in the future! The banner image on the site right now is all greyscale, so I apologize for any confusion.Yes, they don't have a release date yet, but we will be working on them soon-ish!
Yes and yes. All Oryx and MDT chassis are compatible with the bottom bolt release Savages and they will all work with AICS pattern magazines.
Awesome to hear! Unfortunately no, there is no magazine included as we don't know what caliber you guys will be running in them!
Love all the questions from you guys, keep them coming!
The Oryx for most inlets can use metal magazines, however, some are limited to polymer (Howa 1500 SA and Howa mini).
Yeah you've got it!
I would think the 700 SA would work with the Vudoo action and maybe a repeater modded 40X. Volunteers?
With regard to rimfire, I was told that the T1X fits the Tikka chassis using T1X mag and bottom metal.
https://mdttac.com/ca_en/mdt-metal-magazines-short-action.html
Basically, it's on the regular MDT website.
I have a T1X, and I don’t think this is true for any Tikka chassis that is setup for AICS magazines.
The Vudoo V22 will drop right into any chassis inletted for the R700 SA RH, however our magwells are a little tighter and may need to be slightly opened up on the front to function correctly with the magazines.
The Tikka SA chassis that we (and others) make will not work with the T1x without modification to clear the magwell retaining screw, however, our LA chassis might (without modification). We are just waiting for our T1x to arrive to test this theory out
How thick of a barrel will the chassis accept? Not sure if this is the correct terminology...Forward of the recoil lug, (shank) what barrel width will be OK. I'm looking at a straight taper Bartlein and it is 1.200 for the first 5"
This looks like a great, high value option.Okay, so today I recorded a podcast with MDT and Howa and they let me know about the Oryx Chassis
Oryx Chassis Website
This chassis system will come in at $399 and hits a lot of marks for the money.
The Vudoo V22 will drop right into any chassis inletted for the R700 SA RH, however our magwells are a little tighter and may need to be slightly opened up on the front to function correctly with the magazines.
The Tikka SA chassis that we (and others) make will not work with the T1x without modification to clear the magwell retaining screw, however, our LA chassis might (without modification). We are just waiting for our T1x to arrive to test this theory out
I'm eagerly awaiting your findings. This chassis would be perfect for my T1x. Just as an FYI, I've seen several people fit the T1x into the XLR Element with minor modification to the T1x action and not the chassis (and it accepts AICS mags). I've also seen one in an MPA BA Comp with minor modification to the chassis. I'd prefer not to make much modification, so I'll wait.
Any idea how these will work with a Howa Mini in 6.5 Grendel?
What mags would work?
What mags would work?
I think we're going to update this on the site pretty soon, but all Oryx's will accept up to 1.25" barrels at the muzzle. I wouldn't recommend going that large persay, as you may get some forend flex if on a bipod, but it's your call
I have shot an Oryx in 6.5 Grendel and it worked great! They are designed to use the factory, OEM magazines that come with the rifle.
That was a design consideration that came up when we first started the project, but we rarely find anyone uses them, so we decided to omit them from the Oryx. it may be something we add later, but no plans yet.
I think we're going to update this on the site pretty soon, but all Oryx's will accept up to 1.25" barrels at the muzzle. I wouldn't recommend going that large persay, as you may get some forend flex if on a bipod, but it's your call
I have shot an Oryx in 6.5 Grendel and it worked great! They are designed to use the factory, OEM magazines that come with the rifle.
That was a design consideration that came up when we first started the project, but we rarely find anyone uses them, so we decided to omit them from the Oryx. it may be something we add later, but no plans yet.
Need a flush cup on each side then.
While it would be nice Im not sure "need" and a 400 buck chassis full up go together.
Ive never once used the flush cups I dropped extra money to outfit my krg chassis with. The only time I used flushcups on my manners minichassis was when I ran a thermal on it and normal sling swivels would have served just as well. I can carry the rifle in my arms for the 50 yards in between stages.
Id rather have a 400 buck chassis than a 500 buck chassis with stuff I wont use on it.
(Now if they can be incorporated with no price increase then Im all for it! Dont think Im against flush cups, just trying to keep the budget minded stuff budget minded knowing that extra manufacturing steps arent free)
For me I prefer side mount flush cups than traditional bottom side sling swivels for two reasons. 1. my rear sling mount point doesn't interfere with my rear bag and get all hung up. 2. When I am hunting and slinging my rifle having the left side of the rifle against my back (right hand bolt) keeps my shoulder from getting jabbed by my bipod mount while humping thru rough terrain. Just my reasons for having side sling mounts.
Cleaver firearms in QLD Australia lists them as being available late Feb for Tikka SA $549 AUD. Keen to buy one of these bad boys
https://www.cleaverfirearms.com/Products.aspx?Category=NEW FOR 2019
https://www.cleaverfirearms.com/Products.aspx?Category=NEW FOR 2019
I wouldn't recommend going that large persay, as you may get some forend flex if on a bipod, but it's your call
It looks like the oryx is primarily a single aluminum block along it's entire length. My lack of experience with different chassis is probably showing here but in what way would it flex with that type of metal structure? (I.e. longitudinal, torsional, etc)
The Oryx is essentially one, stock piece of aluminum that we have machined down to fit the rifle, attach the buttstock and "bottom metal", you are correct. The flex that you will encounter, and this is true amongst pretty much any chassis and stock, comes from heavier barreled actions supported by a mechanical rest (bipod, monopod, etc.) or bags in the front and rear.
To simplify, you have a heavy mass (barreled action and scope) that is primarily supported by the centre section of your stock/chassis, but the load of that mass (in the chassis/stock) is then resting on the front and rear portions causing bending moments about the two points that it is resting on. No matter how stiff you make your chassis/stock, you will always have some degree of flex (your chassis/stock will look kind of like a banana (exaggerated to make a point) when viewed from a side profile) which will only get worse the heavier you make your barreled action/scope setup.
As shooters love to put heavy barrels in chassis/stocks (myself included!) we are constantly having to keep that in mind during design and remembering to open up the barrel channel for those who want to run action-diameter/no taper barrels, and such, we have to remove a considerable amount of material. By shortening up the forend, you can bring the two resting points closer together and minimise your forend flex, however, you then lose performance (shorter mounting surface for accessories, less available arca/pic rails, less area for internal forend weights on the ACC). It is a constant juggle, but something all aftermarket stock/chassis manufacturers have to deal with
You just need to trim your magazine latch down 1.00 mm (0.039") leaving you only able to use metal magazines (no polymer) or trim 1mm off the front edge of the magazine so that it beds lower on the action.
The chassis is designed around the use of polymer magazines, but the mags or chassis can be altered to work if need be for metal.
Was wondering...Polymer or Metal magazines, will I be able to install a follower to shoot it single shot
There are single shot followers available for metal magazines, but I haven't seen any for the 223. There are also products like the Bob Sled (https://www.brownells.com/magazines...on-aics-bob-sled-1rd-magazines-prod80946.aspx).
Working on it now!
Awesome! We don't have anything in place yet for SH members unfortunately.
Why are MDT chassis for the Howa inletted for plastic mags? The chassis my HCR came with functions with metal AI mags. Mine came with an Accurate Mag.
Probably not, but we haven't ruled out any inlets just yet! We do the LSS XL Gen2 and ESS for the LA 102 right now if you're looking for a chassis
Thank you! We're working on it, listening to the community and making sure we offer the best products that we can!
Yes, our current design on the Oryx is for the use of our polymer magazines only. You can modify the chassis or metal magazines to function in the Oryx, but they are not drop in compatible.
Only the MDT polymer mags? Will it not work with the Magpul polymer mags?
No LH variants slated just yet (as we would need a new mold for the side panels), but there are a lot of requests!
Similar threads
Precision Rifle Gear MDT ACC Elite Chassis Circlips
