• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Rifle Scopes MOA vs Mil.

44171B89-2853-4445-A577-905DAC6097F0.jpeg
 
At normal hunting ranges the difference is inconsequential. Once it is consequential, either method can be used effectively. Finishing on the podium in 2000yd competition, I guess I must know a thing or two. And yes, if one considers themselves a "precision" shooter, I expect they reload their own ammo or I discount them.

Given how we must divide and cut our own throats on each factor of this sport and have no capacity to accept differences of opinion, it is no surprise to me how easily the liberals divide and take us down...what a silly argument.
I get it. You shoot 2000yards. You know everything already. Please enlighten us to why you need to compare MOA to inches and why reloading makes your arguments stronger?

@Lowlight, and many others shoot factory ammo 99% of the time. Why the hell would someone waste time reloading if they didn’t need or want to? How would that make them a worse shooter?
 
I get it. You shoot 2000yards. You know everything already. Please enlighten us to why you need to compare MOA to inches and why reloading makes your arguments stronger?

@Lowlight, and many others shoot factory ammo 99% of the time. Why the hell would someone waste time reloading if they didn’t need or want to? How would that make them a worse shooter?

I reload now, but back in my undefeated competition days, some gov contractor loaded the rounds for me. /shrug
 
I reload now, but back in my undefeated competition days, some gov contractor loaded the rounds for me. /shrug
You shot like shit and held no weight in an argument if you didn’t reload.

Or so I learned tonight.

Oh, and inches are important in MOA shooting.
 
Finishing on the podium in 2000yd competition, I guess I must know a thing or two. And yes, if one considers themselves a "precision" shooter, I expect they reload their own ammo or I discount them.

PlainBackEquestrian.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
You know what 11 inches at 780 yards looks like?
Yup. Shot an elk last year at 730 with a 338 Edge. Dealt strait MOA from the rangefinder through the scope. Dropped it in one shot. No need to replace gear because internet opinion had shifted to MIL. 780 yards is far beyond "reasonable" hunting range for any MOA/inch assumptions and anyone attempting such a shot damn well better understand exactly where their bullet will impact. MOA vs inches means nothing within 400 yards with reasonable rounds. If you are going to shoot far with whatever system you better understand it backwards and forwards. That is what is lost in this dick-measuring contest. Neck sizing? Yes, I use that for some rifles, but not others. A number of years ago that was the fad as was a 308 for everybody. Must be an idiot shooting High Master neck sizing my 284....

I'm disappointed that this site is starting to sound like every other internet forum where we can't have a discussion of opinions as the latest fad must overwhelm.
 
Yup. Shot an elk last year at 730 with a 338 Edge. Dealt strait MOA from the rangefinder through the scope. Dropped it in one shot. No need to replace gear because internet opinion had shifted to MIL. 780 yards is far beyond "reasonable" hunting range for any MOA/inch assumptions and anyone attempting such a shot damn well better understand exactly where their bullet will impact. MOA vs inches means nothing within 400 yards with reasonable rounds. If you are going to shoot far with whatever system you better understand it backwards and forwards. That is what is lost in this dick-measuring contest. Neck sizing? Yes, I use that for some rifles, but not others. A number of years ago that was the fad as was a 308 for everybody. Must be an idiot shooting High Master neck sizing my 284....

I'm disappointed that this site is starting to sound like every other internet forum where we can't have a discussion of opinions as the latest fad must overwhelm.

Bud, you starting using the negative language and telling people they were full of shit.

You got your ass handed to you by people that know more, now you want to say we can’t have a proper discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
Yup. Shot an elk last year at 730 with a 338 Edge. Dealt strait MOA from the rangefinder through the scope. Dropped it in one shot. No need to replace gear because internet opinion had shifted to MIL. 780 yards is far beyond "reasonable" hunting range for any MOA/inch assumptions and anyone attempting such a shot damn well better understand exactly where their bullet will impact. MOA vs inches means nothing within 400 yards with reasonable rounds. If you are going to shoot far with whatever system you better understand it backwards and forwards. That is what is lost in this dick-measuring contest. Neck sizing? Yes, I use that for some rifles, but not others. A number of years ago that was the fad as was a 308 for everybody. Must be an idiot shooting High Master neck sizing my 284....

I'm disappointed that this site is starting to sound like every other internet forum where we can't have a discussion of opinions as the latest fad must overwhelm.
You are the only one taking offense. I nor anyone told you to change or that it was inferior. It’s just different.

So take your highbrow highmaster to a mouthbreather forum where they might be impressed with your lack of comprehension.
 
Heaven forbid we consider a balanced opinion and comparison.. https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/

I guess this Bryan Litz doesn't know anything, we all know if you don't shoot MIL and a 6.5 Creedmoor you don't know what you're talking about....

I shoot MOA because I had over 20 years of experience with it before MIL became popular and it just works for me. I have no need to reprogram my brain. My shooting is primarily range, hunting, and F-Class. I'm not going to scope range an animal, I'm going to laser it or pass.

I quit caring about the opinion of "Precision" Rifle Series shooters when they explained to me that they shot too much to bother reloading....precision ammo...the shooting sports are all just games catering to their specific rules.

If I were a blank slate today I suppose I'd give MIL serious consideration.


Why should I have to change when what I am doing works for me? If you are used to estimating and working things in inches, are you really claiming there is no mental change to thinking in centimeters? Decades of efforts to change the US to metric beg to differ. Not claiming one is imperial and one is metric, but they are different, and the precedent holds. What have you accomplished that makes your opinion more valid than Litz's?

The fact that you think there is no change for someone very versed in doing things in MOA changing to MIL invalidates your opinion. As I said I'm open to both and if I was a blank slate I would be open to MIL...but you are simply claiming there is no penalty to changeover, which is complete and utter bullshit.


Brought this one on yourself.
 
Yup. Shot an elk last year at 730 with a 338 Edge. Dealt strait MOA from the rangefinder through the scope. Dropped it in one shot. No need to replace gear because internet opinion had shifted to MIL. 780 yards is far beyond "reasonable" hunting range for any MOA/inch assumptions and anyone attempting such a shot damn well better understand exactly where their bullet will impact. MOA vs inches means nothing within 400 yards with reasonable rounds. If you are going to shoot far with whatever system you better understand it backwards and forwards. That is what is lost in this dick-measuring contest. Neck sizing? Yes, I use that for some rifles, but not others. A number of years ago that was the fad as was a 308 for everybody. Must be an idiot shooting High Master neck sizing my 284....

I'm disappointed that this site is starting to sound like every other internet forum where we can't have a discussion of opinions as the latest fad must overwhelm.

The point went over your head.

The answer is, it doesn't matter if you know what exactly 11 inches at 780 is; why? Because its stupid to even do the math.

We need to stop looking at MOA or MIL in inches and CM. It doesn't matter; no one knows with any certainty what 11 inches or 29CM looks like at longer ranges. Just ask anyone who has had people spotting for them with spotting scopes with no reticle in them - its a best guess, at best. The real discussion is eliminating the math and eliminating the guesswork altogether. Use MOA or MIL; who cares. As long as the turrets match the reticle and you have a data card/ballistics program its all the same, with different 'sets' of numbers. Nothing would be more useless to me on the gun, than someone telling me I missed 11 inches low; instead, use the damn system infront of your eye that 100% directly translates to anyone using the same system.

Getting away from inch/cm altogether is the argument because that's why the MOA/MIL question keeps coming up.
 
The point went over your head.

The answer is, it doesn't matter if you know what exactly 11 inches at 780 is; why? Because its stupid to even do the math.

We need to stop looking at MOA or MIL in inches and CM. It doesn't matter; no one knows with any certainty what 11 inches or 29CM looks like at longer ranges. Just ask anyone who has had people spotting for them with spotting scopes with no reticle in them - its a best guess, at best. The real discussion is eliminating the math and eliminating the guesswork altogether. Use MOA or MIL; who cares. As long as the turrets match the reticle and you have a data card/ballistics program its all the same, with different 'sets' of numbers. Nothing would be more useless to me on the gun, than someone telling me I missed 11 inches low; instead, use the damn system infront of your eye.

Getting away from inch/cm altogether is the argument.

I expect less logical shit from you.
 
Fuck me. A week or two back I asked about 6.5 vs 308. I am new to this end of the pool. I swear I asked this in fucking earnest. Shit am I sorry.
Don't worry about it. It is new to you, we get this every week it seems. If you use the search function there are a bunch of monster threads on this.
 
The point went over your head.

The answer is, it doesn't matter if you know what exactly 11 inches at 780 is; why? Because its stupid to even do the math.

We need to stop looking at MOA or MIL in inches and CM. It doesn't matter; no one knows with any certainty what 11 inches or 29CM looks like at longer ranges. Just ask anyone who has had people spotting for them with spotting scopes with no reticle in them - its a best guess, at best. The real discussion is eliminating the math and eliminating the guesswork altogether. Use MOA or MIL; who cares. As long as the turrets match the reticle and you have a data card/ballistics program its all the same, with different 'sets' of numbers. Nothing would be more useless to me on the gun, than someone telling me I missed 11 inches low; instead, use the damn system infront of your eye that 100% directly translates to anyone using the same system.

Getting away from inch/cm altogether is the argument because that's why the MOA/MIL question keeps coming up.

“Ummm.......miss right. 12......err, 15 inches”
 
Yup. Shot an elk last year at 730 with a 338 Edge. Dealt strait MOA from the rangefinder through the scope. Dropped it in one shot. No need to replace gear because internet opinion had shifted to MIL. 780 yards is far beyond "reasonable" hunting range for any MOA/inch assumptions and anyone attempting such a shot damn well better understand exactly where their bullet will impact. MOA vs inches means nothing within 400 yards with reasonable rounds. If you are going to shoot far with whatever system you better understand it backwards and forwards. That is what is lost in this dick-measuring contest. Neck sizing? Yes, I use that for some rifles, but not others. A number of years ago that was the fad as was a 308 for everybody. Must be an idiot shooting High Master neck sizing my 284....

I'm disappointed that this site is starting to sound like every other internet forum where we can't have a discussion of opinions as the latest fad must overwhelm.
Would you quit using the term MOA/inches please.
When dialed your scope you did not dial up in inches. You dialed up in fractions of MOA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
“Ummm.......miss right. 12......err, 15 inches”

You also have to remember that most of the time the guy giving me the call also ranged/figured out the range on target (most of the time; you split jobs depending on whats going on and where you are in the dialogue as to WTF is going on around you). So if hes a dildo and told me he had splash or the trace told him 12 inches off the right side of the guy, I wouldn't even know the fucking range to do MOA/MIL mind acrobatics for to adjust for 12 inches.

Obviously I'd have an idea or could lone wolf it and read the reticle and reengage, but again, WHY use inches/cm?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dthomas3523
Ok I’ll bite. Explain.
6mm Dasher was the darling of the benchrest crowd for a good while until it was supplanted by the 6mmBRA. But the Dasher has made some small in roads into PRS.
 
I've been shooting MOA systems for the last 10 years.... I stopped thinking in "inches" about 9.9 years ago.

But I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, so there's that. Coincidence?

You didn’t finish “on the podium” at a 2k match or shoot grand whatever the fuck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subwrx300
I've been shooting MOA systems for the last 10 years.... I stopped thinking in "inches" about 9.9 years ago.

But I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, so there's that. Coincidence?

Since you're shooting MOA, shouldn't you say you stopped thinking in "inches" 9 9/10th years ago? I mean, just to be consistent...
 
I have a 308. I’m staying there right now. If/when I branch out, it’ll most likely be a 6.5.

When you do branch out, just don't be getting any ideas about shooting said 6.5 at a mile then telling people you do shoot at a mile. Tends to upset the moa for life shooters who believe that's only for a select few "chosen" cartridges so I have heard.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: L2bravo