More lies revealed. Oil didn’t come from Dino bones 42 miles deep

BurtG

GOLDEN TICKET HOLDER
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
  • Nov 9, 2022
    8,974
    30,244
    Northeast
    They lied again ? Shocking



    IMG_7737.jpeg
     
    Fossil fuel was coined by Rockefeller to make gas seem rare and valuable. People were tricked and have believed it since kind of like climate change, moon landings and flat earth
    No it wasn’t, the term was developed before he was even alive by a German Physicist Casper Neumann around the year 1760

    What is the purpose of posts like this? Why waste time even saying such nonsense. Its not cute or funny. Its spreading stupidity. I assumed this site was home to some intelligent thought. The more I read its seems their is a vast majority that are entertained by the spread of stupidity and unproven hair brain bullshit.

    I am noticing



    That there’s a bunch of fucking retards down here
     
    The currently used model of subsurface oil, coal, gas production works. Its predictable and usable. "Dinosaurs" are not a critical part of the model, that's just silly hyperbole to make things memorable to those knuckleheads whose simple minds are easily blown. Coastal wetlands and bogs produce loads of buried organic material.

    The alternative hypothesis of deep earth production (which is actually pretty old, I learned about it in undergrad school 50 years ago) does not work. It's actually been tested by intelligently designed deep (really deep) drilling programs and the amount and types of oil recovered is easily attributable to the hydraulic systems used to do the drilling. Furthermore the deep earth temperatures are high enough to destroy complex molecules like hydrocarbons, not produce them. Nobody spends money on trying to produce oil from deep earth sources because it doesn't work.

    I know that recent events have caused elevated skepticism about a lot of things, but lets not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
    Clinically demonstratable ineffectiveness.
     
    They lied again ? Shocking



    View attachment 8786200

    weirdalfoil_134321.png


    The currently used model of subsurface oil, coal, gas production works. Its predictable and usable. "Dinosaurs" are not a critical part of the model, that's just silly hyperbole to make things memorable to those knuckleheads whose simple minds are easily blown. Coastal wetlands and bogs produce loads of buried organic material.

    The alternative hypothesis of deep earth production (which is actually pretty old, I learned about it in undergrad school 50 years ago) does not work. It's actually been tested by intelligently designed deep (really deep) drilling programs and the amount and types of oil recovered is easily attributable to the hydraulic systems used to do the drilling. Furthermore the deep earth temperatures are high enough to destroy complex molecules like hydrocarbons, not produce them. Nobody spends money on trying to produce oil from deep earth sources because it doesn't work.

    I know that recent events have caused elevated skepticism about a lot of things, but lets not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
    Clinically demonstratable ineffectiveness.
    youknow-you.png
     

    Attachments

    • 1760366772018.jpeg
      1760366772018.jpeg
      80.4 KB · Views: 5
    The currently used model of subsurface oil, coal, gas production works. Its predictable and usable. "Dinosaurs" are not a critical part of the model, that's just silly hyperbole to make things memorable to those knuckleheads whose simple minds are easily blown. Coastal wetlands and bogs produce loads of buried organic material.

    The alternative hypothesis of deep earth production (which is actually pretty old, I learned about it in undergrad school 50 years ago) does not work. It's actually been tested by intelligently designed deep (really deep) drilling programs and the amount and types of oil recovered is easily attributable to the hydraulic systems used to do the drilling. Furthermore the deep earth temperatures are high enough to destroy complex molecules like hydrocarbons, not produce them. Nobody spends money on trying to produce oil from deep earth sources because it doesn't work.

    I know that recent events have caused elevated skepticism about a lot of things, but lets not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
    Clinically demonstratable ineffectiveness.
    IMG_6325.gif
     
    There is a reason why the "abiogenic petroleum hypothesis" is not widely accepted by the scientific community. My brother in law has written several books about oil and gas. If oil is abiogenic, why is it full of bio markers?
     
    We have a 3 mile wide, 300M yo impact crater here in Central MO (Decaturville Impact), part of the 38th parallel series, and no oil here.
     
    Do all the Hydrocarbons on the moon Titan come from dead dinosaurs?
    Saturn's moon Titan has abundant liquid hydrocarbons, including methane and ethane, that are similar to but not the same as oil and natural gas found on Earth. These hydrocarbons are derived from the planet's vast organic chemical inventory and form lakes and dunes on Titan's surface, containing more of these substances than all of Earth's known fossil fuel reserves.



    Titan's "Hydrocarbon Oil"
    • Composition:
      On Titan, the liquid hydrocarbons are primarily methane and ethane, which are gases on Earth but remain liquid in Titan's frigid temperatures.
    • Formation:
      These compounds are produced from the breakdown of organic molecules by ultraviolet light from the Sun, creating a "giant factory of organic chemicals".
    • Abundance:
      Titan's surface contains hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than Earth's oil and gas reserves.
    • Location:
      These liquid hydrocarbons collect in large lakes, seas, and rivers, with notable bodies like Ligeia Mare
    Distinction from Earth's Oil
      • Origin:
        Unlike Earth's oil, which forms from the remains of ancient organisms, Titan's hydrocarbons are created abiogenically (without life) through geological and atmospheric processes.
    • Definition:
      While the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, Titan's hydrocarbons do not strictly meet the definition of "oil" or "natural gas" as understood on Earth, which implies a biological origin.
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: supercorndogs
    Why don’t we run a hose from Titan to Earth and stop harmful pumping on earth. Plus, if we pull too much out of the Earth it will shrink like a leaky balloon, and we don’t want that. All the islands will flip over and Florida will be drawn closer to Haiti, and we definitely don’t wanna get any closer to that shithole!
     
    Saturn's moon Titan has abundant liquid hydrocarbons, including methane and ethane, that are similar to but not the same as oil and natural gas found on Earth. These hydrocarbons are derived from the planet's vast organic chemical inventory and form lakes and dunes on Titan's surface, containing more of these substances than all of Earth's known fossil fuel reserves.



    Titan's "Hydrocarbon Oil"
    • Composition:
      On Titan, the liquid hydrocarbons are primarily methane and ethane, which are gases on Earth but remain liquid in Titan's frigid temperatures.
    • Formation:
      These compounds are produced from the breakdown of organic molecules by ultraviolet light from the Sun, creating a "giant factory of organic chemicals".
    • Abundance:
      Titan's surface contains hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than Earth's oil and gas reserves.
    • Location:
      These liquid hydrocarbons collect in large lakes, seas, and rivers, with notable bodies like Ligeia Mare
    Distinction from Earth's Oil
      • Origin:
        Unlike Earth's oil, which forms from the remains of ancient organisms, Titan's hydrocarbons are created abiogenically (without life) through geological and atmospheric processes.
    • Definition:
      While the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, Titan's hydrocarbons do not strictly meet the definition of "oil" or "natural gas" as understood on Earth, which implies a biological origin.
    Once again proving my point, AI is retarded.

    Organic compounds are chemical compounds that contain carbon (C) atoms, usually bonded to hydrogen (H), and often to other elements such as oxygen (O), nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), and halogens (like chlorine (Cl) and fluorine (F)). They are called “organic” because they were once thought to come only from living organisms. Today, we know that organic compounds can also be synthesized in laboratories. [1-4]

    Methane CH4
    Petrol C8H18
     
    Last edited:
    So the question was, if they are being made on Titan with no fossils no life. Why do we assume they need fossils and life to be made on earth?
    Has anyone thought about the dinosaurs getting on a spaceship and flying to Titan? That might be why there are hydrocarbons on Titan.
     
    Why don’t we run a hose from Titan to Earth and stop harmful pumping on earth. Plus, if we pull too much out of the Earth it will shrink like a leaky balloon, and we don’t want that. All the islands will flip over and Florida will be drawn closer to Haiti, and we definitely don’t wanna get any closer to that shithole!
    Hoser!
    1000003197.jpg
     
    We have a 3 mile wide, 300M yo impact crater here in Central MO (Decaturville Impact), part of the 38th parallel series, and no oil here.
    Different aliens.
    So the question was, if they are being made on Titan with no fossils no life. Why do we assume they need fossils and life to be made on earth?
    See above.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: BurtG
    Why don’t we run a hose from Titan to Earth and stop harmful pumping on earth. Plus, if we pull too much out of the Earth it will shrink like a leaky balloon, and we don’t want that. All the islands will flip over and Florida will be drawn closer to Haiti, and we definitely don’t wanna get any closer to that shithole!
    I wanna see someone suck a golfball through it.
     
    Why don’t we run a hose from Titan to Earth and stop harmful pumping on earth. Plus, if we pull too much out of the Earth it will shrink like a leaky balloon, and we don’t want that. All the islands will flip over and Florida will be drawn closer to Haiti, and we definitely don’t wanna get any closer to that shithole!
    1000025311.jpg

    My favorite Shel Silverstein poem when I was a kid.
     
    I just watched a video where they were discussing that they found extremophiles in the deepest regions they have drilled. Organic life forms. They thought they wouldn’t exist in that heat, but there they are. Living organisms, organic matter feeding on all sorts of things, dealing with the radiation, etc. they think each one could live more than thousands of years. So if that’s the case, it’s not hard to think that they could be caught up in the oil. Berea tar pits type of stuff. If you haven’t seen the Pits, it’s worth the visit.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Herb Stoner
    No it wasn’t, the term was developed before he was even alive by a German Physicist Casper Neumann around the year 1760

    What is the purpose of posts like this? Why waste time even saying such nonsense. Its not cute or funny. Its spreading stupidity. I assumed this site was home to some intelligent thought. The more I read its seems their is a vast majority that are entertained by the spread of stupidity and unproven hair brain bullshit.

    I am noticing



    That there’s a bunch of fucking retards down here
    You should try ARFCOM...
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Darayavaus