• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

Car jacker gets jacked in San Diego.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=2ebf7669ecd7" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Car jacker gets jacked in San Diego.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=2ebf7669ecd7" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I saw that the other day. I love the finger stomp.
 
I am not nor will ever be a powerlifter, but I push weight every day I can. I train hard and give it all I have and more. Great video! Thanks!!

I am fortunate enough to work out in the same gym as Mark Robb and Chad Rexrode. I was a gym rat when I was younger but nothing like these guys, they push more iron in two sets than I do for a whole workout.
 
bcfat_zps1751abce.png


... and one for The Shank.

Cheers,

Sirhr

I always get Shanksters sloppy seconds
 
I don't meet with Pscyhopaths. You claim to have inside knowledge of the destruction of the Twin Towers on 09/11/01. I invite you to come up here and meet with these people.. I will pay the one way carfare for you.

All Hospitals have some . The Nurses in the section of Bellevue where Maggot belongs all look like Nurse Ratched.


I was going to let it go but since you insist:

So Im a psychopath and should be locked up because I expressed an opinion, backed with evidence...whether or not you are capable of understanding or agreeing with it?

My understanding, is that in America, each and every individual is free to express their opinion with out fear of reprisal.

What does that make you?

I think at best, a cognitive dissonant.

1932300_690108127713002_140744472_n.jpg

It goes downhill quickly from there.

I offered you the opportunity to forcibly restrain me as you stated should be done.

All mouth. NO CAJONES.

I'm Laffin at ya boy.

Go back to mommy's tit.

I can teach the ignorant. Stupid is forever.
 




I was going to let it go but since you insist:

So Im a psychopath and should be locked up because I expressed an opinion, backed with evidence...whether or not you are capable of understanding or agreeing with it?

My understanding, is that in America, each and every individual is free to express their opinion with out fear of reprisal.

What does that make you?

I think at best, a cognitive dissonant.

View attachment 43328

It goes downhill quickly from there.

I offered you the opportunity to forcibly restrain me as you stated should be done.

All mouth. NO CAJONES.

I'm Laffin at ya boy.

Go back to mommy's tit.

I can teach the ignorant. Stupid is forever.
 
I was going to let it go but since you insist:

So Im a psychopath and should be locked up because I expressed an opinion, backed with evidence...whether or not you are capable of understanding or agreeing with it?

My understanding, is that in America, each and every individual is free to express their opinion with out fear of reprisal.

What does that make you?

I think at best, a cognitive dissonant.

View attachment 43328

It goes downhill quickly from there.

I offered you the opportunity to forcibly restrain me as you stated should be done.

All mouth. NO CAJONES.

I'm Laffin at ya boy.

Go back to mommy's tit.

I can teach the ignorant. Stupid is forever.

You went downhill a long time ago. You are an EDP and it is only a matter of time before you are FORCIBLY committed.
 



Best part - look deep into her eyes... See it? That level of trust she has with the person taking the photo? She is so happy to have someone overlook (use) her morbid obesity, that she would do anything / suffer for them. That my friends is the face of a subservient person that will accept abuse. Remember the look, there will be a test later. Pass / fail is predicated on possession of such power and instead figuring out a means to employ others to lift themselves out of their self made morass.
 
It might be best if you guys read this. I'm not convinced there is a clear understanding of the amendment represented in this thread.
FIRST AMENDMENT

FIRST AMENDMENT: AN OVERVIEW

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. See U.S. Const. amend. I. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV.

Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the "separation of church and state." Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person's practice of their religion.

The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.

Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the first amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.

The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual's current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with first amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.

The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.
 
It might be best if you guys read this. I'm not convinced there is a clear understanding of the amendment represented in this thread.
FIRST AMENDMENT

FIRST AMENDMENT: AN OVERVIEW

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. See U.S. Const. amend. I. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV.

Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the "separation of church and state." Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person's practice of their religion.

The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.

Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the first amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.

The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual's current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with first amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.

The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.

Seems to apply to one of us.
 
Best part - look deep into her eyes... See it? That level of trust she has with the person taking the photo? She is so happy to have someone overlook (use) her morbid obesity, that she would do anything / suffer for them. That my friends is the face of a subservient person that will accept abuse. Remember the look, there will be a test later. Pass / fail is predicated on possession of such power and instead figuring out a means to employ others to lift themselves out of their self made morass.

Her eyes? I couldnt get past that navel.
 
Best part - look deep into her eyes... See it? That level of trust she has with the person taking the photo? She is so happy to have someone overlook (use) her morbid obesity, that she would do anything / suffer for them. That my friends is the face of a subservient person that will accept abuse. Remember the look, there will be a test later. Pass / fail is predicated on possession of such power and instead figuring out a means to employ others to lift themselves out of their self made morass.

Brace yourselves for this one or better yet, skip reading the following paragraph all together.

You have this opposite. There was/maybe still is a website called feederfantasy.com or something of the like. Don't ask how I know about it. It is a forum where these morbidly obese people go to find what they call 'feeders' who will enable them. The 'feeders' are generally subservient to the fatties and wait on them hand and foot. There was usually some sort of weird sexual fetish attached to these relationships, and I repeat the fatties are generally the dominant ones. If this is not a sign of a coming apocalypse, I don't what is.
 
Brace yourselves for this one or better yet, skip reading the following paragraph all together.

You have this opposite. There was/maybe still is a website called feederfantasy.com or something of the like. Don't ask how I know about it. It is a forum where these morbidly obese people go to find what they call 'feeders' who will enable them. The 'feeders' are generally subservient to the fatties and wait on them hand and foot. There was usually some sort of weird sexual fetish attached to these relationships, and I repeat the fatties are generally the dominant ones. If this is not a sign of a coming apocalypse, I don't what is.

Should be reamed "Shankster's Fantasy".