I agree.
Exactly right. Miriam Carey was suffering from post-partum depression when she rammed a gate at the White House. After a brief chase, the Capitol Police shot her car full of holes with her toddler in the back seat. She had no firearms, she was just having a very bad day. Worse than that was the disgusting praise Republicans and Democrats gave the CP for "keeping them safe".
Never worked at the mall just various govt/fed facilities.
ok retard. were you guarding epstein? that is the level of competence found in your .gov facilities.
Please point to the law that permits the shooting of unarmed woman so long as you are doing it because she crossed an imaginary line.
really, how old are you? i ask this because my mom died of cancer in 1975.
Nice to have a face to a name. She was white, it's alright, right?
You can add the fat RINO William Barr who defended Lon Horiuchi's actions at RR to the list.
Old enough to know that she still owes me 20 bucks plus interest
had a seance to talk to mom.
No nuke facilities
Until that happens.....shit is going to keep going on and on and on.......Mac
welovetrump.com 
I’m not going to say I agree or disagree with you but I would like to ask a question. If we take this for what it is in its simplest form, your argument is basically B&E, correct? So, what I want to know is, why deadly force is ok for them but when a homeowner has the same situation at hand and kills someone they get drug through the mud and the same gov that executed someone for the same crime will says it’s ok for them but not for you. This is what people are getting pissed about. It’s unequal application of the law hands down. Is it legal for you to shoot and kill someone in DC that is breaking into your house? I don’t believe it is for the common folk, correct me if I’m wrong. Different states have different laws on this but since this happened in DC let’s talk specifically about DC. Can anyone answer that. I ain’t got time to look it up. Now I’m sure many will make the argument that the gov is different and blah blah but let’s be honest, what makes a politicians life worth anymore protection than a normal person?
Not to mention technically speaking these buildings belong to the taxpayer. I know I know, it’s not the same abd you can’t just walk into certain facilities but why not? You are a citizen, you pay for it, you pay them, etc.
alethonews.com No it's not basic B&E.
Again, what makes their lives any different than anyone else’s? After all, these are normal people that we elect. They aren’t gods, stop treating them like they are. So what, it’s a capitol building that belongs to the people of this country, it’s not theirs technically speaking. By your argument anyone owning a home, business whatever that has been broken into has full justification to shoot anyone breaking in, period. That’s what you are arguing, except that’s not the case. If someone breaks into a Walmart on Black Friday and the security guard is armed and shoots someone, he will likely go to jail. Same goes for some people protecting their families and homes in some states. Seems to me that it’s ok for some people, but not for others, hence the problem. Now the kicker is, they didn’t know if anyone’s lives were in danger. You can make that argument. And fear with stress can make people do crazy things, most on this board know that. And you can call me a dumbass all you want, doesn’t change anything. It’s still a building and these are still ordinary people elected to serve behind those walls. And I’m not saying they shouldn’t be protected. As I said I’m neither agreeing or disagreeing. My issue is unequal application of laws. I’m just coming at this from a different angle and asking people to think and ask these questions. Again, is it legal for someone to kill someone B&E in their home in DC?
Wrong kind of boots... They need to be thigh high
Didn't miss anything. The only sad part is you're comparing the Capitol Building to a dwelling. And no it's not Public Access. Public Access is your grocery store, Library, roadway Etc.
Yes. And you can gain access with a badge/approved pass, in session or not. This is still not the point tho.
Well, my time was before that so I cannot speak for more recent times.
I'm not even sure what 'alt-left' means. But, whatever they're called, nothing scares them and all democrats more than a true conservative, because they know conservatism works, and it renders the left irrelevant, illustrates their hypocrisy, and lack of arguments. It doesn't take the left long to trot out the name-calling: racist, bigot, homophobe, white supremacist, etc, because they have no logical argument; name-calling, to me, means you have no argument; they run on knee-jerk emotionalism and ad hominem attacks. They know their ideas are bankrupt by their own actions: flooding the country with new 'voters', and rigging elections in their favor. President Trump is just the latest example of how they deal with anything conservative. Sarah Palin was another. Their approach to President Reagan was only slightly less vicious and heartless.I don't think it's conservatives or conservative thought, specifically. More dissenting thought. They attack the dissenting left just as vigorously as they do the right, possibly more-so. It is how they have gained power so swiftly, the left fears the alt-left. They have been having internal power struggles on the left over ideology for the last decade or so. It started taking stronger hold during Obama -- largely because the first 'lady' was and is alt-left. We saw this bleed through regularly in Obama's speeches, but if you go read Obama's post-presidency speeches you'll very clearly see his beliefs don't align with his wife's. He's very left, for sure, but she's hard alt-left.
The Obama presidency gave the alt-left a foothold, but they were still fringe. In the shadows, so to speak. But during Trump's run through 2016 and subsequent presidency, the alt-left flourished. They didn't need to be in the shadows, they came out charging. Anti-Trump rhetoric was popular, and it sold in the media. So mainstream outlets sought out the alt-left to produce news content, rage content. And produce they did. During this period, the alt-left didn't just flourish -- they overtook the establishment left. Overtook them everywhere except actual seats in the House and Senate. But the alt-left has control of the institutions now and they have a strong foothold in the chambers of congress -- more importantly, they've taken control over many parts of the Democrat party.
Many, nay most, do not realize the parties are actual entities and those entities are not bound by law in how they function. There's a reason the demonrats can rig primaries and there's no actual consequence. They could literally anoint anyone they want to run, they do not need your votes. And, in some districts across the country, this is likely already happening. Just recently a district in Las Vegas had decades long staff leave because the alt-left took over:
Entire Staff of Nevada Democratic Party Quits After Democratic Socialist Slate Won Every Seat
The battle between insurgent progressives in Nevada and the Harry Reid machine began building in 2016.theintercept.com
I suspect that by 2022 the democrats will no longer have any hope to recove. r the party. The alt-left has control of the machine that gets them elected. They're funded largely by just a few sources. Basically these freak anti-America billionaires and China. The chinese influence comes largely in the form of advertising and product control. China controls the media through their ad sales department and business partnerships. If your news agency isn't saying the right things -- well, they'll just stop advertising with your company. Does your company advertise on that bad news station? Ohh, we can't manufacture your product here anymore -- that relationship there is problematic. They've been doing this, quietly, for decades -- and it's paid off.
They've been running these ops against the US for decades and we are too dense to even recognize it. Our military is already weakened significantly by this weird partnership the alt-left has with China. They've turned them, establishing institutional religious structures for their ideology in our own military.
So, no -- I don't think conservatives or conservative thought is more dangerous to a liberal. To a liberal, the most dangerous thing is the alt-left. But there's not many liberals left -- most liberals you would now think are conservatives and more likely when you use the term liberal, as though it is to deride another, is really directed at the alt-left.
This is the tactic of the left, to change the meaning of language, and it is 'everyone else' that allows them to do it. Sadly, because I think the average person is just too damn ignorant and too lazy to stay the persistent attacks of the alt-left. We have this pesky desire to live and be left alone, likewise we tend to leave others be -- and it's the latter that allows these leftist freaks to spread like bacterium.
not the sage comments i was looking for
By contrast, the female officer who 'accidentally' killed a felon in Minneapolis, was arrested before his body reached room temperature, her name plastered all over by msm, and blm allowed to riot at her home. This is the double standard folks are tired of.
All good points.A few points, the fascism you guys are labelling as "conservatism" has proven not to be stable anywhere, it doesn't "work". Your "left wing" democratic party is still neoliberal right wing imperialist fuck the poor bomb everyone to make arms manufacturers rich and wonder why the rest of the world hates you spec. You don't have a left wing party and the amount of corporate control boot licking and hilarious "freedom" rubbish you carry on with is embarrassing. You "hate" criminals but support policy which generates more of them. Apparently the public funded health systems in pretty much every other developed nation are the devil for some reason too.
