"Welcome to the party pal!"
As someone who has studied AGW in depth for close to 20 years including actually reading many published climate science papers I can assure you that there exists ZERO science to support the AGW hypothesis. Not just a little bit, but zero fucking science and 100% of the AGW predictions have been wrong. Again, not even a little bit, not even one has come true. 100% wrong.
Hell, I even know people that set out to make a career out of climate science on the PHD level and after a few years quit their career path because they learned it's all garbage. They learned this when they followed the actual scientific process
But let me support this journalist's revelation for a minute. I once had a coworker cut out an article from the local paper declaring that our state had the hottest year on record. The article sourced NOAH. Ok, so I go to NOAH and that was not at all what the data showed. I rubbed said coworkers face in the actual NOAH data that he was too lazy to go read himself and let's just say he was not happy at all that I pointed out how he had been lied to by his beloved media source and the data was there but he was too fucking lazy to go read it. I mean, the fucking "journalist" quoted NOAH and lied about what was there!