It's not a religious sacrifice as characterized by Tucker. He was careful to add that it's basically a Satanic ritual and that anyone who advocates for bodily autonomy is "our enemy". That's divisive and damaging to the country, of which, BTW, 69% support at least some legal access to abortion.
Sacrifice carries with it some implicit baggage that does not cover the full story. And language matters. A zygote with 16 cells in not a "child". It has the potential to become a child. But "God" will abort 75% of all zygotes. Is God aborting children? Language matters, and Tucker's language is device and self-serving. IMO
Have you ever seen a d&c or d&e? Might want to see one before you characterize it. It’s not a gentle procedure, but necessary in some miscarriages and other exceedingly rare instances. Can’t even imagine a live embryo or fetus in there. Gruesome.
So if a zygote isn’t a human, I won’t get in trouble if I make some omelets out of bald eagle or sea turtle eggs right? I mean, it’s not an eagle/turtle, doesn’t look like an eagle/turtle, thus not protected by law, so I’m good right?
If I’m poor and don’t have enough money to feed and house myself and my kids, they can starve or freeze so I can eat in comfort correct? Wouldn’t your interpretation of the law support that? I mean, I can’t be required by law to provide sustenance or shelter for my kids, ‘cause bodily autonomy, right? So if I’ve got a 2 month old that’s one more mouth than I can feed, and I decide to dispose of it, what’s the difference if I’ll come to harm otherwise. Why am I obliged to “remain parenting”? It sounds disgusting, because it is. You’re just arguing on semantics.
What you apparently don’t realize is the law has long recognized the unborn and protected them with great zeal, just not humans. Also, the law requires that you fulfill your obligation to those whom you are RESPONSIBLE for, namely, YOUR CHILDREN!