PortaJohn

ZGdGKh6k07tT.png
Real estate is in such a shambles at the moment that it is a good business move to pull out. Saying it was because of Trump's case just seems like icing on the cake and allow for a reason to exit the market for now. IOW, I'm skeptical of this headline.
 

"The Mexican government set up a checkpoint near a gap in the border with the United States, widely used by migrants to cross into the country, CBS News reported.

The gap, known as the San Judas break, is located near San Diego, in California. The outlet indicated that is witnessed nearly 600 crossings over a four-day span.

Now, following the actions by the Mexican government, people have started using a different route, although a more complicated one: smugglers would take migrants by car and drop them off near the San Judas break, but now they are taking them to a spot that can't be reached by car and that requires hours of walking.

Even if the checkpoint doesn't deter migrants from seeking alternative paths to cross into the U.S., it adds to the recent actions by the Mexican government seemingly aimed at stemming the flow on its own soil."
 
  • Wow
Reactions: theLBC
Real estate is in such a shambles at the moment that it is a good business move to pull out. Saying it was because of Trump's case just seems like icing on the cake and allow for a reason to exit the market for now. IOW, I'm skeptical of this headline.

Hochul assured all real estate builders/investors that NY wont do that them. its only becuase its Trump. anyone else who does it would be super legal and wouldnt get sued when there is no victim.
 

McAfee, who was sworn in on Feb. 1, 2023 after being appointed by Republican Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, made his donation in June 2020 while still working as an assistant U.S. Attorney for the Department of Justice (DOJ), according to financial disclosures. He will soon have to decide whether Willis should be disqualified over allegations that she financially benefited from appointing her romantic partner, Nathan Wade, to work on the Trump case.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 10ring'r and theLBC
Last edited:
Silver Star with Gold Leaf recipient for Ass Kissing and D!ck Sucking superiors.
MOH with rainbow recipient for stepping on his service brothers and sisters to attain favors and rank.

He is nothing more than a soulless cracker in a uniform that will unflinchingly take orders from people neither you or I elected.

.
Is the big red one for calling Chinah behind the CIC's back?
AFAF.

R
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terry Cross
Then why would they ask if you’ve been vaccinated during the screening survey?

IMG_2097.png
 
Then why would they ask if you’ve been vaccinated during the screening survey?

Again, to determine if potential donor would be eligible to donate for whole blood, versus plasma, or maybe use for one group of individuals vs. another...

I can't imagine them saying no to 75% of the potential donors unless they were trying to use it to create an intentional blood supply shortage in case of major crises - you know like how they were looking for donors after a terror attack that killed a couple thousand and they put word out that donors are needed. Can't imagine any crises in the near future though, you know with things being so swell.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
Belize is an english speaking country.

Their government went covid nazi on their subjects back during the plandemic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shooter McGavin
Buying future votes.
They don't need voters. They already have the voters to keep control. They are increasing the population to gain more seats in the house of representatives. Remember when they pushed to get illegals counted in the census? People didn't think that there was a hidden agenda. But there was. Guess who went along with it? If you guessed the republicants. You are correct.
 


“Time, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, and the Chicago Tribune accept hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars from the Chinese Communist Party in exchange for publishing content by China Daily.The same outlets taking China Daily's money were among those warning most vociferously about the dangers of misinformation.”