Who would have taught that mail in ballots have been systematically used to commit election fraud for decades
Elections in Germany: Professor proves systematic fraud
26 September 2024
Not the exception, but the rule: systematic electoral fraud in Germany
The renowned scientist Prof. Jochen Renz has examined the election results of the last few years. The result is shocking and suggests that elections in Germany have been rigged on a large scale for decades.
by
Prof. Jochen Renz
In the 2016 Austrian presidential election, there were a noticeable number of invalid postal votes in some constituencies in the second round compared to the first round. Since there were a number of such anomalies, the entire election was repeated. During the investigation into
possible election fraud, some "sloppiness" was uncovered, particularly with postal votes. For example, ballot papers were often opened before the counting and in some cases pre-sorted.
Both are prohibited under electoral law, as they would make manipulation possible.
It is not surprising that postal votes are easier to manipulate than ballot votes. In ballot votes, ballot papers are counted immediately after the election has ended, so there is not much opportunity for manipulation. In postal votes, on the other hand, ballot papers usually remain in the town hall for several days and sometimes weeks before they are counted. In the days and weeks before the election, new ballot papers are added every day, so there must be constant access to ballot papers that have already been received. Postal ballot papers are then counted, unlike in ballot votes, and are not taken directly from the ballot box, which is under observation throughout election day. In addition, the counting of postal votes sometimes takes place separately from ballot votes and may not be possible for election observers to see them. In addition, it is not possible to check who filled out the ballot paper.
In the 2017 federal election, 28.6% of votes were cast by postal vote, a total of 13,430,468 ballot letters. Due to this volume, postal votes can play a decisive role in the outcome of the election and can potentially have a strong influence on an election.
In the following, we examine whether there were statistical anomalies in federal elections, particularly with regard to postal votes, similar to those in Austria, that could indicate electoral fraud. We compare all federal elections since 1990 and the 2014 European elections. This makes it possible to observe long-term trends in voter behavior, particularly differences between postal voting and ballot voting, and to find any irregularities that contradict the long-term trends. In doing so, we come to some astonishing results.
There are two irregularities that not only strongly contradict long-term trends, but also had a decisive influence on the election outcome. In both cases, electoral fraud seems possible. It is noteworthy that in both cases important information is not publicly available that would indicate the discrepancies, but which is available in other elections.
Such an analysis is not possible in Germany immediately after an election and before the official two-month objection period has expired, as the Federal Election Ordinance does not provide for a distinction between postal voting and ballot voting. The relevant data is either not published at all in Germany, or sometimes only published years after the election. Irregularities such as those in the Austrian presidential election cannot therefore be discovered in time in Germany.
In Deutschland werden Wahlen seit Jahrzehnten gefälscht. Zu diesem Ergebnis kommt ein renommierter Wissenschaftler.
www.anonymousnews.org
www.nbcnews.com
www.thegatewaypundit.com
