PortaJohn



Israel is not a perfect country. No country is perfect. Neither are we.

It comes down to three choices.

1) We support Israel.
2) We support Hamas and by extension all muslim terrorists.
3) We support neither.

I choose #1. Why? Because God says that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. Reference Genesis 12:3 and Numbers 24:9.

That doesn't mean we give them a pass over everything. We should call out wrong doing whenever and wherever we see it. That doesn't mean giving aid and comfort to their enemies; who are also our enemies. More on that later.

Despite some of the bad things that they have done, they have still remained our best ally in the Middle East. Some would argue that the Saudis are a good ally. When friends like them, why do we need enemies?

If we choose #2 we are choosing to slit our own throats. There is no other religion in the world that has Christianity in its cross hairs more than Islam. That means the United States.

Some people over here may not think that we are a Christian country and that's a debate for another day. However, the muslim terrorists and the countries that support them believe we are a Christian country. So they contend that we must be destroyed.

Iran is the biggest supporter of Hamas. Remember that they refer to us as the "Great Satan." They want to destroy us as much as they do Israel.

So choosing option #2 is a suicide maneuver for us.

If we choose #3 that's just as bad as choosing #2. Sacrificing Israel is a bad idea for the reason that I gave for choosing #1.

Like I said, even if you don't believe in the biblical blessings and curses; by giving the Mediterranean goat-fuckers the country of Israel only results in strengthening them and encouraging them.

From a military and political perspective, keeping Israel alive provides a distraction for them. By spending their resources on trying to eliminate Israel, that's less that they have to spend on hurting us.

Let that last statement sink in for a minute. As long as there is a country in the Middle East that the Mediterranean goat-fuckers spend time, money, resources and people on the less they have available to attack us.

Even if they were able to wipe Israel off the map and kill every Jew in the world, the Islam-o-fascists won't stop there. They want nothing less than world domination, impose sharia law on our homeland, enslave your women and children then kill all white Christian men.

So whether anyone likes it or not, we have no choice but to choose #1. That's my two cents worth.
 
Israel is not a perfect country. No country is perfect. Neither are we.

It comes down to three choices.

1) We support Israel.
2) We support Hamas and by extension all muslim terrorists.
3) We support neither.

I choose #1. Why? Because God says that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. Reference Genesis 12:3 and Numbers 24:9.

That doesn't mean we give them a pass over everything. We should call out wrong doing whenever and wherever we see it. That doesn't mean giving aid and comfort to their enemies; who are also our enemies. More on that later.

Despite some of the bad things that they have done, they have still remained our best ally in the Middle East. Some would argue that the Saudis are a good ally. When friends like them, why do we need enemies?

If we choose #2 we are choosing to slit our own throats. There is no other religion in the world that has Christianity in its cross hairs more than Islam. That means the United States.

Some people over here may not think that we are a Christian country and that's a debate for another day. However, the muslim terrorists and the countries that support them believe we are a Christian country. So they contend that we must be destroyed.

Iran is the biggest supporter of Hamas. Remember that they refer to us as the "Great Satan." They want to destroy us as much as they do Israel.

So choosing option #2 is a suicide maneuver for us.

If we choose #3 that's just as bad as choosing #2. Sacrificing Israel is a bad idea for the reason that I gave for choosing #1.

Like I said, even if you don't believe in the biblical blessings and curses; by giving the Mediterranean goat-fuckers the country of Israel only results in strengthening them and encouraging them.

From a military and political perspective, keeping Israel alive provides a distraction for them. By spending their resources on trying to eliminate Israel, that's less that they have to spend on hurting us.

Let that last statement sink in for a minute. As long as there is a country in the Middle East that the Mediterranean goat-fuckers spend time, money, resources and people on the less they have available to attack us.

Even if they were able to wipe Israel off the map and kill every Jew in the world, the Islam-o-fascists won't stop there. They want nothing less than world domination, impose sharia law on our homeland, enslave your women and children then kill all white Christian men.

So whether anyone likes it or not, we have no choice but to choose #1. That's my two cents worth.
You really need to study on #1. Zionists are not what God was talking about.
How are Israelis/Jews that rejected Jesus as the Messiah any different than a Buddhist, Muslim or an atheist?
 
You really need to study on #1. Zionists are not what God was talking about.
How are Israelis/Jews that rejected Jesus as the Messiah any different than a Buddhist, Muslim or an atheist?
This. In addition, being “friendly with” doesn’t mean they should control the US Congress and get huge volumes of free $$$$ collected from US/Canadian tax payers. The Bible does not say “pay billions to anyone who says they are of said ethnic group”. If “they”, who are self identified, are the group that cannot be criticized on pain of imprisonment by our own cops and judges, well the oppressors are clearly marked.
 
This. In addition, being “friendly with” doesn’t mean they should control the US Congress and get huge volumes of free $$$$ collected from US/Canadian tax payers. The Bible does not say “pay billions to anyone who says they are of said ethnic group”. If “they”, who are self identified, are the group that cannot be criticized on pain of imprisonment by our own cops and judges, well the oppressors are clearly marked.
Israel is embedded to deeply in US politics, finance, education and media. This is not "support" for Israel, this is a foreign incursion into the very infrastructure of the US. As far as I am concerned we sell weapons to Israel, monitor human rights issues between the two countries, have trade agreements and that is all.
 
Israel is not a perfect country. No country is perfect. Neither are we.

It comes down to three choices.

1) We support Israel.
2) We support Hamas and by extension all muslim terrorists.
3) We support neither.

I choose #1. Why? Because God says that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. Reference Genesis 12:3 and Numbers 24:9.

That doesn't mean we give them a pass over everything. We should call out wrong doing whenever and wherever we see it. That doesn't mean giving aid and comfort to their enemies; who are also our enemies. More on that later.

Despite some of the bad things that they have done, they have still remained our best ally in the Middle East. Some would argue that the Saudis are a good ally. When friends like them, why do we need enemies?

If we choose #2 we are choosing to slit our own throats. There is no other religion in the world that has Christianity in its cross hairs more than Islam. That means the United States.

Some people over here may not think that we are a Christian country and that's a debate for another day. However, the muslim terrorists and the countries that support them believe we are a Christian country. So they contend that we must be destroyed.

Iran is the biggest supporter of Hamas. Remember that they refer to us as the "Great Satan." They want to destroy us as much as they do Israel.

So choosing option #2 is a suicide maneuver for us.

If we choose #3 that's just as bad as choosing #2. Sacrificing Israel is a bad idea for the reason that I gave for choosing #1.

Like I said, even if you don't believe in the biblical blessings and curses; by giving the Mediterranean goat-fuckers the country of Israel only results in strengthening them and encouraging them.

From a military and political perspective, keeping Israel alive provides a distraction for them. By spending their resources on trying to eliminate Israel, that's less that they have to spend on hurting us.

Let that last statement sink in for a minute. As long as there is a country in the Middle East that the Mediterranean goat-fuckers spend time, money, resources and people on the less they have available to attack us.

Even if they were able to wipe Israel off the map and kill every Jew in the world, the Islam-o-fascists won't stop there. They want nothing less than world domination, impose sharia law on our homeland, enslave your women and children then kill all white Christian men.

So whether anyone likes it or not, we have no choice but to choose #1. That's my two cents worth.
Stop with the forced dualism. BOTH are bad. And the enemy of your enemy is not your friend. Israel propaganda sure is strong on boomers.
 
Israel is not a perfect country. No country is perfect. Neither are we.

It comes down to three choices.

1) We support Israel.
2) We support Hamas and by extension all muslim terrorists.
3) We support neither.

I choose #1. Why? Because God says that whoever blesses Israel will be blessed and whoever curses Israel will be cursed. Reference Genesis 12:3 and Numbers 24:9.

That doesn't mean we give them a pass over everything. We should call out wrong doing whenever and wherever we see it. That doesn't mean giving aid and comfort to their enemies; who are also our enemies. More on that later.

Despite some of the bad things that they have done, they have still remained our best ally in the Middle East. Some would argue that the Saudis are a good ally. When friends like them, why do we need enemies?

If we choose #2 we are choosing to slit our own throats. There is no other religion in the world that has Christianity in its cross hairs more than Islam. That means the United States.

Some people over here may not think that we are a Christian country and that's a debate for another day. However, the muslim terrorists and the countries that support them believe we are a Christian country. So they contend that we must be destroyed.

Iran is the biggest supporter of Hamas. Remember that they refer to us as the "Great Satan." They want to destroy us as much as they do Israel.

So choosing option #2 is a suicide maneuver for us.

If we choose #3 that's just as bad as choosing #2. Sacrificing Israel is a bad idea for the reason that I gave for choosing #1.

Like I said, even if you don't believe in the biblical blessings and curses; by giving the Mediterranean goat-fuckers the country of Israel only results in strengthening them and encouraging them.

From a military and political perspective, keeping Israel alive provides a distraction for them. By spending their resources on trying to eliminate Israel, that's less that they have to spend on hurting us.

Let that last statement sink in for a minute. As long as there is a country in the Middle East that the Mediterranean goat-fuckers spend time, money, resources and people on the less they have available to attack us.

Even if they were able to wipe Israel off the map and kill every Jew in the world, the Islam-o-fascists won't stop there. They want nothing less than world domination, impose sharia law on our homeland, enslave your women and children then kill all white Christian men.

So whether anyone likes it or not, we have no choice but to choose #1. That's my two cents worth.
Also, Hamas is FUNDED by Israel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r
probably another case of the government swooping in to keep the family quiet.


The family did not want the case to be “politicized” or “publicized,” according to Kittle
 
  • Angry
Reactions: 10ring'r
You really need to study on #1. Zionists are not what God was talking about.
How are Israelis/Jews that rejected Jesus as the Messiah any different than a Buddhist, Muslim or an atheist?
The Jews that rejected Jesus as the Messiah are not any different than a Buddhist, Muslim or an atheist. All of the people from those groups meet the same end; an eternity in hell. The Jews that reject Jesus will spend eternity in hell just like someone who claims to be a Baptist, Methodist, Mormon or Catholic.

I will agree that there is a difference between a Zionist and a Jew. However, there are some people who fit both groups. IMHO, there are more people that are Jewish blended with Zionistic attitudes.

If it weren't for Zionism then there probably wouldn't be any Jews in Israel today. Which is a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

At one time the Democrats had the best interest of the United States in mind just as much as Republicans and/or Whigs. All those parties considered themselves Americans. That's not true today but I bring up that example from history to illustrate my point. There were some democrats that were also true Americans but it didn't make all democrats true Americans. There are some Zionists that are Jewish but not all Zionists are Jewish.

Read the book of Revelations. One purpose of the seven year tribulation period is to get the attention of the Jews so they accept the Messiah that they continue to reject.

Even if I am entire wrong on option #1 we would be in worse trouble if we picked the other two options.

This. In addition, being “friendly with” doesn’t mean they should control the US Congress and get huge volumes of free $$$$ collected from US/Canadian tax payers. The Bible does not say “pay billions to anyone who says they are of said ethnic group”. If “they”, who are self identified, are the group that cannot be criticized on pain of imprisonment by our own cops and judges, well the oppressors are clearly marked.
You don't get any argument from me. There's things that the Israelis do that I disagree with and would also point out (if I were President) to them, that if they continue to do will only result in souring relations.

The USS Liberty is a really good example of what the Israelis did that was really bad. If I were President back then, I would have come down hard on them for that. Which doesn't mean withdrawing support.

I've been learning a lot of things recently about our WW2 ally, Great Britain, lately. They were not the best ally that we or the French could have during WW2.

They did some pretty despicable things regarding the French Resistance during the war. That's a complicated discussion but suffice it to say that the SOE sacrificed a lot of men and women that stood up to the Nazis just to satisfy Stalin.

Roosevelt and the OSS probably knew what they did and that was just as bad. The problem for us back then was what would happen if we discarded Great Britain. We couldn't. Keep in mind that Germany declared war on us not the other way around.

I didn't want to open on the can of worms on European politics in WW2 but that is best analogy that I can come up with now.

Israel is embedded to deeply in US politics, finance, education and media. This is not "support" for Israel, this is a foreign incursion into the very infrastructure of the US. As far as I am concerned we sell weapons to Israel, monitor human rights issues between the two countries, have trade agreements and that is all.
I don't like having any country embedded in US politics, finance, education and media. That goes for Israel.

There is nothing wrong with selling weapons, monitoring human rights and having trade agreements.

Stop with the forced dualism. BOTH are bad. And the enemy of your enemy is not your friend. Israel propaganda sure is strong on boomers.

I don't think it's forced dualism. Even if it was, there are so many times in our individual lives when we are "forced" into "duality." Just ask any man who has to be "nice" to his ex-wife who's the queen of cunts just so he can see his kids without going to court to do it.

I bring up the previous example of WW2. The Soviets were a "cold war" enemy of the US even before WW2. Their espionage and assassination teams were as thick as fleas in the US. Both the Roosevelt and Truman administrations had so many agents that they were trying to recruit each other without knowing the other was a Soviet agent.

Yet we had no other choice during WW2. Remember that Hitler declared war on us, not the other way around.
 
IMHO the big guy held back when he struck back at the fat ass nigger bitch. He could have knocked her out with one punch and broke her jaw as well. More of this needs to be done or else don't go where niggers like that congregate.


wanted to see the next 1 min that wasn't on video. What did the big black guy do? $$ says he didn't remove the problem (the woman who assaulted the white guy)
 
wanted to see the next 1 min that wasn't on video. What did the big black guy do? $$ says he didn't remove the problem (the woman who assaulted the white guy)
I don't know what happened next. My guess is that the big black guy did nothing but might have pulled the mouthy bitch away. I say that because if it escalated any further with the big black guy attacking the white guy, we might have also seen that on video.

G2xtWqfaAAAJU-o
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MWAlex2

IMF Warns Banks and Supervisors of Liquidity Risks in $9.6 Trillion FX Market​



"Global banks have significant dollar exposure in their balance sheets, making them vulnerable to potential funding shocks. The increasing involvement of non-bank financial institutions and growing trade in derivatives "may also raise the global FX market’s vulnerability to adverse shocks," the IMF said.
Stress in the FX market "can spill over to other asset classes, tightening financial conditions and posing risks to macro financial stability—especially in countries with significant currency mismatches and fiscal vulnerabilities," the IMF added."


"China's state iron ore buyer has told major steelmakers and traders to temporarily pause purchases of any dollar-denominated seaborne iron ore cargoes from BHP, according to Bloomberg News reports citing people familiar with the matter."
And another one dropping the dollar. Now using the Yuan. I'll keep saying it: a large part of WW3 is economic, and it is increasingly BRICS vs Dollar. They are slowly withdrawing from SWIFT.

India Ceases Using U.S. Dollars for Russian Oil Purchases​


 
  • Wow
Reactions: babyguppy
The Jews that rejected Jesus as the Messiah are not any different than a Buddhist, Muslim or an atheist. All of the people from those groups meet the same end; an eternity in hell. The Jews that reject Jesus will spend eternity in hell just like someone who claims to be a Baptist, Methodist, Mormon or Catholic.

I will agree that there is a difference between a Zionist and a Jew. However, there are some people who fit both groups. IMHO, there are more people that are Jewish blended with Zionistic attitudes.

If it weren't for Zionism then there probably wouldn't be any Jews in Israel today. Which is a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

At one time the Democrats had the best interest of the United States in mind just as much as Republicans and/or Whigs. All those parties considered themselves Americans. That's not true today but I bring up that example from history to illustrate my point. There were some democrats that were also true Americans but it didn't make all democrats true Americans. There are some Zionists that are Jewish but not all Zionists are Jewish.

Read the book of Revelations. One purpose of the seven year tribulation period is to get the attention of the Jews so they accept the Messiah that they continue to reject.

Even if I am entire wrong on option #1 we would be in worse trouble if we picked the other two options.


You don't get any argument from me. There's things that the Israelis do that I disagree with and would also point out (if I were President) to them, that if they continue to do will only result in souring relations.

The USS Liberty is a really good example of what the Israelis did that was really bad. If I were President back then, I would have come down hard on them for that. Which doesn't mean withdrawing support.

I've been learning a lot of things recently about our WW2 ally, Great Britain, lately. They were not the best ally that we or the French could have during WW2.

They did some pretty despicable things regarding the French Resistance during the war. That's a complicated discussion but suffice it to say that the SOE sacrificed a lot of men and women that stood up to the Nazis just to satisfy Stalin.

Roosevelt and the OSS probably knew what they did and that was just as bad. The problem for us back then was what would happen if we discarded Great Britain. We couldn't. Keep in mind that Germany declared war on us not the other way around.

I didn't want to open on the can of worms on European politics in WW2 but that is best analogy that I can come up with now.


I don't like having any country embedded in US politics, finance, education and media. That goes for Israel.

There is nothing wrong with selling weapons, monitoring human rights and having trade agreements.



I don't think it's forced dualism. Even if it was, there are so many times in our individual lives when we are "forced" into "duality." Just ask any man who has to be "nice" to his ex-wife who's the queen of cunts just so he can see his kids without going to court to do it.

I bring up the previous example of WW2. The Soviets were a "cold war" enemy of the US even before WW2. Their espionage and assassination teams were as thick as fleas in the US. Both the Roosevelt and Truman administrations had so many agents that they were trying to recruit each other without knowing the other was a Soviet agent.

Yet we had no other choice during WW2. Remember that Hitler declared war on us, not the other way around.
Do you know what books Hitler burned? And why?







IMG_8106.jpeg