• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Rifle Scopes Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Savage-10FP

Private
Minuteman
Sep 17, 2007
23
0
57
Tracy, Ca
Hi guys,
A couple weeks ago I purchased a Night force mil/mil MLR scope. I love the thing. Over the last 20 years I have only shot MOA scopes. I didnt think it would be a problem converting over to mil/mil since I never really used moa for ranging. I cant get past the fricken inch thing with the moa.
I have tried reading posts on mil/mil and for what ever reason I cant grasp it. I have been trying the simulation program/demo version on http://www.shooterready.com/mildemo.html.
Once in a while I think I have it figured out using there calculations then all of a sudden I cant hit sheeit. Can you guys send me any links or share any info that may make the light go on in my head.
Thanks
Brian

 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Easy. Use that MLR to range the height, then get you a mildot master and use the slide rule on the right side and just plug in the height you've milled.


I'll see if I can find you some interweb images...
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Look at this pic Rem...

http://www.gunblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Mil-Dot-Master.jpg

The slide on the right, just line up the height of your target you're ranging (in inches, in the middle), with the amount of mils you estimate with your reticle on the right hand side. Then look over to the left and see the estimated range.

Easy-peezy.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Look at the reticle, between the center of the crosshair and the center of any of the first mil dots around the crosshair is 1 Mil.

That one mil is broken down in 10 - 10th with the first short hash mark being .5 or half a mil. So the long hash mark or the second line is 1 mil. (no mil dots)

That is how you look at the reticle, think of it in 10th, and not in whole numbers.

Take the size of the target in Shooter Ready, in Inches and multiply that times 27.8 and then divide that number by the mils or 10th of a mil you see the scope measure.

The reticle is a ruler, use it to measure the target thinking in 10th.

If you have a Mil / Mil scope you can bag it into a position, then putting the crosshair on one side of the target, dial the windage until the reticle is on the other side. That is how many mils you have to range.

Size of Target in Inches X 27.8 / Size of target in Mils = Range in Yards.


To convert your MOA dope to Mils you only have to divide your MOA value by 3.43 and that will give you the equivalent dope in mils. so you can use your same dope.

Remember the reticle is a ruler and the dials match what you see in that ruler.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

The problem is most inexperienced people run right to ranging once they buy this stuff never understanding ranging with a reticle should be one of the last things you do, not the first.

It's 2010, get a range finder, ranging is sloppy, it's a legacy skill that takes hours of practice and requires you to maintain the skill in order to be proficient . The reticle does much more than just range. A skilled operator can look at a target first and be closer in less time than a novice with a mil reticle. You'd be better off walking around town estimating distances to objects everyday afterwards tapping it with a laser than thinking about mil ranging.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
It's 2010, get a range finder, ranging is sloppy, it's a legacy skill that takes hours of practice and requires you to maintain the skill in order to be proficient . The reticle does much more than just range. A skilled operator can look at a target first and be closer in less time than a novice with a mil reticle. You'd be better off walking around town estimating distances to objects everyday afterwards tapping it with a laser than thinking about mil ranging. </div></div>

Good to hear you say that LL. I've always wanted to say that, but don't think I could get away with it.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Thanks for the replies guys. And I understand what you are saying Lowlight. I am trying to learn as much as I can right now. Unfortunetly funds are tight right now.So a rangefinder isnt going to happen for a couple months, Next weekend I will be building up a dope card out to 1K with the help of some really experienced shooters from this board.The more I can understand my scope before I take the long range shooting class next week I think I will be better off I will be.
Thanks again guys. This site is fricken awesome.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The problem is most inexperienced people run right to ranging once they buy this stuff never understanding ranging with a reticle should be one of the last things you do, not the first.

It's 2010, get a range finder, ranging is sloppy, it's a legacy skill that takes hours of practice and requires you to maintain the skill in order to be proficient . The reticle does much more than just range. A skilled operator can look at a target first and be closer in less time than a novice with a mil reticle. You'd be better off walking around town estimating distances to objects everyday afterwards tapping it with a laser than thinking about mil ranging. </div></div>

With the risk of being castrated here, I have to disagree With you LL. Ranging is not sloppy if practiced. You are correct it is a perishable skill that has to be practiced. The problem is that some people are too lazy to become proficient at this valuable skill. Do we have LRFs? Of course....Are they accurate?........of course..... Can I look at something and judge distance accurately yes because of my expierence but.......LRFs are electronic, batteries die, they break sometimes but I can guarantee you my M3A, spotting scope, or even need be the 24 or 22s will always be handy. Yes not all can be or need to be skilled in this field craft but once you are it is an invaluable skill to have. And yes for all of you that want to rebuttal me, the reticle does do more than range, it is great because if you know your dope and practice hold off and become proficient in that skill, engagements of multiple targets at varying distances becomes a reality and your skills will be that much greater for mastering your equipment.......THOSE RETICLES JUST DON'T LOOK COOL PEOPLE!!!!!!!! LEARN TO USE THEM
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Rem,
Take it a step at a time with the Mil dots.
What ever fits between two of the dots is a thousand times however big that is away.
If a box one foot high goes dot-to-dot, it's 1,000 feet away (333 yds).
If something a yard high spans dot center to dot center, it's a thousand yards away. If one yard spans two dots, it's half that, 500 yards. A yard high 4 dots, 250 yards.
The skill is nothing ever fits perfectly between the dots and estimating a tenth or an eigth is a bitch. And the longer the distance, which is where you need a more exact range, the tougher it is.
If you can do it, you're a witch.
Practice.
Practice, Practice.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: popeye089</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The problem is most inexperienced people run right to ranging once they buy this stuff never understanding ranging with a reticle should be one of the last things you do, not the first.

It's 2010, get a range finder, ranging is sloppy, it's a legacy skill that takes hours of practice and requires you to maintain the skill in order to be proficient . The reticle does much more than just range. A skilled operator can look at a target first and be closer in less time than a novice with a mil reticle. You'd be better off walking around town estimating distances to objects everyday afterwards tapping it with a laser than thinking about mil ranging. </div></div>

With the risk of being castrated here, I have to disagree With you LL. Ranging is not sloppy if practiced. You are correct it is a perishable skill that has to be practiced. The problem is that some people are too lazy to become proficient at this valuable skill. Do we have LRFs? Of course....Are they accurate?........of course..... Can I look at something and judge distance accurately yes because of my expierence but.......LRFs are electronic, batteries die, they break sometimes but I can guarantee you my M3A, spotting scope, or even need be the 24 or 22s will always be handy. Yes not all can be or need to be skilled in this field craft but once you are it is an invaluable skill to have. And yes for all of you that want to rebuttal me, the reticle does do more than range, it is great because if you know your dope and practice hold off and become proficient in that skill, engagements of multiple targets at varying distances becomes a reality and your skills will be that much greater for mastering your equipment.......THOSE RETICLES JUST DON'T LOOK COOL PEOPLE!!!!!!!! LEARN TO USE THEM</div></div>

It absolutely is sloppy, how much Mil ranging do you do past 600m ?

Mil ranging is dependent on light conditions, target, angle to target, known size of target, a mistake in any of it can mean a huge miss, especially past 600m, where the danger space of a 7.62 is reduced. Not to mention ranging a moving man -- most just figure 36" hips to head and ranging full value targets, try it on a target that is only partially exposed.

Military guys have the benefit of maps, which tell them key points to help reference the range, and most are not mil ranging past 600m.

Batteries die... really news to me. If you have a mission you change them, if the batteries die I would blame you before the batteries. We're not using Rayovac batteries from the 1970's. Chances are of they die when you need them it's because you didn't replace them. Batteries are free in the military and there is no reason not to change them.

Now, you're laser will get broken, that is a reality. But again you have a map to note points in your AO to reference off of. The average US shooter has no map and unknown distance targets are truly unknown in many other ways.

Yes, you can become proficient, I spend hours behind a reticle everyday, and mil to within the nearest 100th of a mil, because really past 600 a 10th of a mil isn't going to cut it. When you'r e shooting inside there, minute of man, you can be off a whole lot and still get a solid kill without ever knowing your mil range was off.

I contend it sloppy, for too many reasons to list.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Frank, that is really good to read. I started milling before I started using a LRF, (haven't been doing either for all that long,) and while the LRF confirmed that I was usually close, it was also WAY faster than milling the target.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: popeye089</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The problem is most inexperienced people run right to ranging once they buy this stuff never understanding ranging with a reticle should be one of the last things you do, not the first.

It's 2010, get a range finder, ranging is sloppy, it's a legacy skill that takes hours of practice and requires you to maintain the skill in order to be proficient . The reticle does much more than just range. A skilled operator can look at a target first and be closer in less time than a novice with a mil reticle. You'd be better off walking around town estimating distances to objects everyday afterwards tapping it with a laser than thinking about mil ranging. </div></div>

With the risk of being castrated here, I have to disagree With you LL. Ranging is not sloppy if practiced. You are correct it is a perishable skill that has to be practiced. The problem is that some people are too lazy to become proficient at this valuable skill. Do we have LRFs? Of course....Are they accurate?........of course..... Can I look at something and judge distance accurately yes because of my expierence but.......LRFs are electronic, batteries die, they break sometimes but I can guarantee you my M3A, spotting scope, or even need be the 24 or 22s will always be handy. Yes not all can be or need to be skilled in this field craft but once you are it is an invaluable skill to have. And yes for all of you that want to rebuttal me, the reticle does do more than range, it is great because if you know your dope and practice hold off and become proficient in that skill, engagements of multiple targets at varying distances becomes a reality and your skills will be that much greater for mastering your equipment.......THOSE RETICLES JUST DON'T LOOK COOL PEOPLE!!!!!!!! LEARN TO USE THEM</div></div>

It absolutely is sloppy, how much Mil ranging do you do past 600m ?

Mil ranging is dependent on light conditions, target, angle to target, known size of target, a mistake in any of it can mean a huge miss, especially past 600m, where the danger space of a 7.62 is reduced. Not to mention ranging a moving man -- most just figure 36" hips to head and ranging full value targets, try it on a target that is only partially exposed.

Military guys have the benefit of maps, which tell them key points to help reference the range, and most are not mil ranging past 600m.

Batteries die... really news to me. If you have a mission you change them, if the batteries die I would blame you before the batteries. We're not using Rayovac batteries from the 1970's. Chances are of they die when you need them it's because you didn't replace them. Batteries are free in the military and there is no reason not to change them.

Now, you're laser will get broken, that is a reality. But again you have a map to note points in your AO to reference off of. The average US shooter has no map and unknown distance targets are truly unknown in many other ways.

Yes, you can become proficient, I spend hours behind a reticle everyday, and mil to within the nearest 100th of a mil, because really past 600 a 10th of a mil isn't going to cut it. When you'r e shooting inside there, minute of man, you can be off a whole lot and still get a solid kill without ever knowing your mil range was off.

I contend it sloppy, for too many reasons to list. </div></div>

To disect your argument standing piece by piece by piece, yes if not practiced, yes it can be sloppy very sloppy indeed didn't diagree with you as you can see from above.

"Mil ranging is dependent on light conditions, target, angle to target, known size of target, a mistake in any of it can mean a huge miss, especially past 600m, where the danger space of a 7.62 is reduced. Not to mention ranging a moving man -- most just figure 36" hips to head and ranging full value targets, try it on a target that is only partially exposed."
Agree with you completely but a any experienced military shooter should know you have more than an average man in your AO for ranging, signs vehicles, buildings, doorways, overpassses, pole, etc.... YOU CAN RANGE ANYTHING. When you get in any theater you should create a constants list and study it to become knowledgable of your AO. Not being a smartass but I am sure many here can vouch that that is SOP for many of us military guys.

"Military guys have the benefit of maps, which tell them key points to help reference the range, and most are not mil ranging past 600m."
I can agree epecially since most FOVs in my experiences in urban are maybe 600m at most because of the building skylines

"Batteries die... really news to me. If you have a mission you change them, if the batteries die I would blame you before the batteries. We're not using Rayovac batteries from the 1970's. Chances are of they die when you need them it's because you didn't replace them. Batteries are free in the military and there is no reason not to change them."
Yes i use the isue lithium batteries like many here but LL people here will vouch as I am sure you can too, fluxuating temperatures can kill batteries not saying it happens all the tim but even if it happens just once isn't being proficient in a field craft important for taking that one shot?

"Yes, you can become proficient, I spend hours behind a reticle everyday, and mil to within the nearest 100th of a mil, because really past 600 a 10th of a mil isn't going to cut it. When you'r e shooting inside there, minute of man, you can be off a whole lot and still get a solid kill without ever knowing your mil range was off."
Like you I also got to the 100ths place becauese like you I know the importance of say .9 to .95 I don't spend hours everyday not that lucky but I run ranging at 2 ranges every week while i shoot. Our range are from 50m -1000m We have a LRF but we range with reticles first then get a confirmation from the LRF....Why some may ask, just good practice for any professional to stay on their game.......Also dude relax you came so crazy LOL it's all good we all have opinions
cool.gif


 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

I don't disagree with you, and you're speaking to the choir in many ways, but honestly

where are the street signs, overpasses, telephone poles or doorways here:

2-27-08a.jpg


In Iraq sure, urban to the hilt, in many of the areas in Afghanistan a lot less of those ancillary items to range.

I don't deny if Murphy smiles on you, there is a plenty to use, but for guys, like the OP here, it's not the same. which is the point.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Not castrating you popeye089, just differing with you from my own experience. Lowlight, I know you're the very last guy to need any backup from a forum newby, and definitely not my intention here either. I just felt the need to speak my piece. S/F.

I definitely agree with Lowlight here in reference to civilian shooters like the OP, and also in the practical implementation in the military/LE circles. Mildot reticle ranging has it's place in the school house when learning the basics, and is a good skill to maintain through occasional training as an "oh shit" backup for the military snipers, but only as a last resort method of range estimation.

While it worked for me on the entry road to Stone Bay Ranges and on range 4 at Quantico, it only failed to provide me accurate ranging during deployments overseas. Maybe I was just always doing it wrong, not putting enough focus onto it, or maybe this is another example of school house training having little to no real world practical purpose because of the variables involved.

I've worked in Afg. for quite some time. Standard sizing of objects doesn't work here, as there is no standard in existence. There's no building code for hand made mud homes; tires are whatever they could come up with and many times are different sizes even on the same axle; street signs, when you do find them, are hand made in no standard dimensions. Even their weapons aren't standard as a lot of them are handmade in Pakistan, and the variation in nationalities and home regions of the fighters and populace prevents you from using average size of a man. All these conditions makes mildot ranging for me just like Lowlight said: Sloppy.

I believe that mildot ranging has gone the way of map and compass navigation. Another good skill to know just in case, but the 21st century technology available has taken it completely out of practical common practice. In the tactical world of "2 is 1, 1 is none", my range finding tier runs LRF; map; field expedient; mildots.

For me it just goes in the category of things I don't miss: Non-adjustable stocks, no bipods, Gen 2 night vision, no suppressors, fixed 10x scopes with 4.5 minutes of windage and MOA elevation, 5 round internal magazines, 173gr M118 ammo, iron sights for spotters, old 3 color cammies, and PRC-77s. Good riddance.

Damn I love technology and innovation.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't disagree with you, and you're speaking to the choir in many ways, but honestly

where are the street signs, overpasses, telephone poles or doorways here:

2-27-08a.jpg


In Iraq sure, urban to the hilt, in many of the areas in Afghanistan a lot less of those ancillary items to range.

I don't deny if Murphy smiles on you, there is a plenty to use, but for guys, like the OP here, it's not the same. which is the point. </div></div>

Also in that pic there is a fence and a window not to mention the building, in given AOs there alway seem to be a running average size for those objects LL

I agree completely it cannot be used all the time or all places but is it not useful for certain people to know how to do given certain circumstances or needs? That is all I am saying. Given anything sure a LRF is better that just goes without saying, but RE is just another tool in the bag, like a map and compass, because you never know.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

The problem of ranging out at long distances is compounded by greatly increased drops. If I was off (with my load) by 25 yards at 1000 yards, that means missing 22-26" of drop. How easy is that? On a "perfect" one-yard wide target it would mean just being off by 1/40th of a mil. Anyone who has mil-ranged in the field knows how hard it is. I could not keep my scope steady enough.

That said, I think mil-ranging can be useful out to around 500 yards/meters. I prefer to use my LRF, but have found that I can come close enough to overcome the relatively less drastic drops out to that range. A mil reticle with matching turrets is also nice for adjusting shots on target.

For whatever reason, instead of multiplying the target's size by 27.78 I have always found it easier to first convert the target's size to the units I'm working in, e.g. 18" becomes .5 yards, then multiply that times 1000. The last step is then the same - dividing by the number of mils - and that is always the hard part since you end up with something like 500/1.7.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

Rem700-P,

As a newbie to this forum myself, I have also gone through the challenge of understanding the use of a mil/mil scope. As I'm sure you've noticed, there are many members here that have light years experience beyond the average shooter. For that reason, it can sometimes be difficult to grasp some of the feedback from a post. I make no claim whatsoever to being an "expert" with a mil/mil scope, but I have a pretty strong background in math and physics, so I'm lucky enough to be able to follow most of what I read here. So this reply is meant to be at the most basic level.

For the purpose of range estimation, I am fortunate enough to live in a downtown area with buildings at various distances that almost all have red bricks on the exterior. They must have all come from the same red brick factory because they're exactly 8" wide (I know because I have actually measured them, which drew some funny looks from people that saw me doing it). For the purpose of learning as much as I could about its use, I started practicing ranging of these buildings with the reticle using the 8" bricks as a reference. During the process, I came across this webpage regarding milliradians and range estimation:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_mil

I found it useful mainly because it has a table that for some reason used 8" as the target size, so it fit in very well with my use of bricks for range estimation. I found other info there that was useful as well, but whether it is "good" info or not, I'll leave to those more experienced to judge. You can take a look and see if you think it is helpful. My other suggestion is to force yourself to stop thinking in MOA. Not so easy to do, I know, but if you practice at it, it will come.

Regarding accuracy of range estimation, note the term used is "estimation". Any scientific conclusion drawn from a collection of measurements is by definition only as accurate as the LEAST accurate SINGLE measurement out of all the measurements used. The same is true for range estimation. The average human eye should easily be able to discriminate 0.1 mil increments in a reticle. Although I doubt I could do it, the experts here can obviously take that down to 0.01 mil increments. Even if your eye can only pick out 0.1 mil increments, is that the least accurate measurement involved in ranging? Perhaps here in the states it might be close, because there are many objects available of exact known size to choose from. Plus, it's much less likely for most that there will be bad guys trying to range you at the same time. But as stated above, for someone on deployment, that may not be true. If you have to use a vehicle, man's torso, doorway, etc., how accurate is that length (distance) value? Probably not as accurate as 0.1 or 0.01 mil. At 1000 yds, 0.01 mil subtends a distance of ~0.36". Estimating the length of a man's torso or height of a vehicle could easily be off by 10 to 20 times that distance (ie. 0.1 to 0.2 mil arc). So that input becomes the limiting factor in the estimation of range. No matter how accurate any other data used in the range estimate, the least accurate measurement will always be limiting. Hence, the term "sloppy".

Anyhow, good luck and keep at it, I'm sure it will click with a little practice.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

It's almost impossible to accurately Mil a moving target anyway. A flash-Mil on a large target is about the best you can hope for, and is the purpose of the reticle.
 
Re: Purchased a mil/mil Nightforce. I need help

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Look at the reticle, between the center of the crosshair and the center of any of the first mil dots around the crosshair is 1 Mil.

That one mil is broken down in 10 - 10th with the first short hash mark being .5 or half a mil. So the long hash mark or the second line is 1 mil. (no mil dots)

That is how you look at the reticle, think of it in 10th, and not in whole numbers.

Take the size of the target in Shooter Ready, in Inches and multiply that times 27.8 and then divide that number by the mils or 10th of a mil you see the scope measure.

The reticle is a ruler, use it to measure the target thinking in 10th.

If you have a Mil / Mil scope you can bag it into a position, then putting the crosshair on one side of the target, dial the windage until the reticle is on the other side. That is how many mils you have to range.

Size of Target in Inches X 27.8 / Size of target in Mils = Range in Yards.


To convert your MOA dope to Mils you only have to divide your MOA value by 3.43 and that will give you the equivalent dope in mils. so you can use your same dope.

Remember the reticle is a ruler and the dials match what you see in that ruler. </div></div>

But if you have a Mil/Mil scope with a SFP reticule doesn't the scope have to be set at a specific power for milling to work? FFP scopes work thru the power ranges so milling should be a breeze, but as most scopes are SFP it's not that straight forward.