Rifle Scopes Rail intergrated level
- Thread starter PKT1106
- Start date
No experience with it, but personally, it's not where I want the level. It's too close for my eye to focus on, and I prefer that the level is positioned for my non-shooting eye.
I like a level mounted on the scope tube, offset to the side of the non-shooting eye, and forward of the turrets (often forward of the front ring). For a right-hand shooter, this allows the level to be seemingly superimposed into the upper right quadrant of the scope's sight picture not far from the center. After getting used to this setup, it works very well without drawing the shooting eye away from the reticle (and target). YMMV
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/846101/hollands-signature-series-anti-cant-device-30mm-matte
I like a level mounted on the scope tube, offset to the side of the non-shooting eye, and forward of the turrets (often forward of the front ring). For a right-hand shooter, this allows the level to be seemingly superimposed into the upper right quadrant of the scope's sight picture not far from the center. After getting used to this setup, it works very well without drawing the shooting eye away from the reticle (and target). YMMV
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/846101/hollands-signature-series-anti-cant-device-30mm-matte
I think if I wanted one on my base I'd get the USO one. I don't see the point in getting a new base just because there is a level there, I'd take a more commonly used and tested brand anyway.
I really like the prototype level I was given. Hoping he pulls through with a production model sometime.
It is an interesting system but I don't know if it will work for me. For me is better to have something mounted on left side, something wich I can see with my left eye. Now I use a b-square bubble level and work fine.
Best
Best
I'm looking at your picture of your ARalike, but I'm not seeing whatever it is we are supposed to be seeing.
No experience with it, but personally, it's not where I want the level. It's too close for my eye to focus on, and I prefer that the level is positioned for my non-shooting eye.
I like a level mounted on the scope tube, offset to the side of the non-shooting eye, and forward of the turrets (often forward of the front ring). For a right-hand shooter, this allows the level to be seemingly superimposed into the upper right quadrant of the scope's sight picture not far from the center. After getting used to this setup, it works very well without drawing the shooting eye away from the reticle (and target). YMMV
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/846101/hollands-signature-series-anti-cant-device-30mm-matte
My thoughts exactly. Sound advice
So whats the best option? How do you ensure that the ring mounted one is even level?
What about the USO ones?
What about the USO ones?
