My understanding is, no……Are the old hit barrel compatible with the new rifles?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My understanding is, no……Are the old hit barrel compatible with the new rifles?
Not sure how they lightened the bolt lift going from a 90° to a 60° since that will give less of a mechanical advantage and you're trying to cock that firing pin the same amount with less ramp to do it. That said, I've never had a problem with any of my 90° bolts, Havak Hit included.Just watched the guns America YouTube. Looks interesting. Like the quick change barrels, although ths pinned collar seems like it might lend itself to play, and the supposed lightened bolt lift. It'll be interesting to see some start trickling out.
I was told by Seekins that old hit barrels work in the new hit rifle but not the other way around. New barrels won’t work on the old action.Are the old hit barrel compatible with the new rifles?
I'm struggling to understand how this would work....all a barrel/action interface is is threads and headspace, which either work or they don't. How can it work for one but not the other?I was told by Seekins that old hit barrels work in the new hit rifle but not the other way around. New barrels won’t work on the old action.
I don’t understand it either… especially since it works one direction but not the other.I'm struggling to understand how this would work....all a barrel/action interface is is threads and headspace, which either work or they don't. How can it work for one but not the other?
Wouldn't the bolt nose recess affect headspacing and therefor only work one way? I'm curious from an engineering perspective to know how this all works.AI AW/AX barrels will work on an AE but AE barrels won’t work on them. True AE barrels aren’t threaded under the lug. If the statement is accurate (I have no clue) I’d say something similar changed in those regards since the clamping paw is now inside the action instead of in front of the action on the rail. It could be just like the AI AE’s where the old ones weren’t threaded all the way to the shoulder and now they are. There could be a relief in the new tenons where they’ll still work in the old actions but the old barrels won’t work in the new. There’s plenty of ways they could be backwards compatible and it’s not as simple as a thread is a thread. It could also be the bolt nose recess and not be the threads at all.
what I’ve seen is the the new rifles support more of the case head. The new barrel tenon is slightly longer and would interfere with the bolt head of the old riflesWouldn't the bolt nose recess affect headspacing and therefor only work one way? I'm curious from an engineering perspective to know how this all works.
What cartridge on the hit? Is it claimed?Got the HIT in today and the NRL pictured will be here Monday.
View attachment 8629533View attachment 8629534
I initially thought he made a very poor move going away from the 700 footprint, but I now see why and feel his way is better. All of the features of the rifle are well thought out even down to the trigger pins. Sign me up. He has designed a better mouse trap IMO.
Agreed, it opens up some many stock and chassis options.Unpopular opinion, but I feel the only thing redeeming about the R700 footprint, in modern times, was its universal adoption.
I am happy to see folks come up with a “better mouse trap”
Ai at and ax barrels fit on ae actions, but ae barrels will not work on at/ax. The ae had a unthreaded part on barrel journal that lug covered. The at/ax barrel that's fully threaded works with lug.I'm struggling to understand how this would work....all a barrel/action interface is is threads and headspace, which either work or they don't. How can it work for one but not the other?
Well, I'm loving the PH3 NRL 6.5CM, already on my second barrel. 3100 on my first one. The 60 degree throw is incredible. really liking it !! Great ergonomics, easy to get behind in all positions, check rest is very comfortable, don't have a bad word to say about it !Any more feedback on this rifle? Especially if someone has both the ph2 and the ph3. I'd love to see a comparison.
What I saw in text was that it was a "hybrid reciever" ...aluminum with steel inserts. Supposed to withstand the high pressure cartridges.Which parts in PH3 are alu?
Love mine. Shoots lights out.^^^ The Element is an Al receiver. The PH3 is steel.
The PH3 is very nice. The bolt lift and the short throw are good. When I first shot mine, the bolt travel was sticky. The receiver I.D. has some surface marking/finish that looks a little like scraper flaking (it isn't), but the bolt body isn't surface hardened. The sticky-ness is going away, and it looks like it is from the bolt guide slot and bolt stop/guide friction. The detachable bolt head and handle means the bolt body can be colored or plated.
The stock is molded, so there are a few sharp edges around the cheek riser. The palm swell is big, so that's a love/hate thing. The interrupted receiver pic rail reduces weight but also reduces mount options...
Over all, I am very pleased with it. Mine shoots very well, and it's a hand-pleasing carry, and it balances nicely.
ETA: No .378" bolt heads yet. That's a drag
My Havak Hit (prior generation) had a little stickiness for the same reason when new. I put a bit of grease on the bolt guide/release tab, and some inside the guide channel on the bolt. It smoothed out a lot within about 250 rds/dry fires. It's buttery now. I noticed that it is also sensitive to off-angle leverage on the bolt, the more you run it directly fore/aft the smoother it is. Weird leverage through lever/knob can make it prone to sticking.The sticky-ness is going away, and it looks like it is from the bolt guide slot and bolt stop/guide friction.
Yes mines a straight jacket armory. Max contour is M24Has anyone ordered a custom barrel for one of these yet? The barrel channel seems restricting for contour options, particularly at the shank end.
Is that on a HIT? Sorry, I was referring to the ph3. They have a print posted on their website for contour on the ph3 and it looked a lot smaller than m24Yes mines a straight jacket armory. Max contour is M24
It’s all the PH3, it’s just in a different chassis or the stock which has a mini chassis in it. It should be the same but I’d call Seekins and ask or email them and ask to be sure because whatever they say is more accurate than here.Is that on a HIT? Sorry, I was referring to the ph3. They have a print posted on their website for contour on the ph3 and it looked a lot smaller than m24
That's essentially a rem varm contour with a very short 1.2 shank.This is the print I saw on the PH3. The HIT has a different one that reflects a larger inlet for the M24 profile. I'll definitely reach out to them, because I'd like to use the QC barrel change to its fullest.