Re: Smooth-Kote
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">With the smooth kote, cleaning is standard.
Run a wet patch of solvent down, and then clean patches until little to no black color.
Then reapply the smooth kote.
A word on using the product tho... its intended to reduce fouling and act as a DRY lube, so if your cleaning on the same frequency or have some humidity around dont use the product.
Moly attracts water so your barrel will rust up easier.
If you clean frequently then it doesnt matter so much.
But IMO the purpose of smooth kote shows when your either shooting really hot loads OR you run in comps where you can afford to clean between shoots. </div></div>
Ooo...that's interesting, specially the attracting water bit! one thing we have lots of in the uk is water! So, that begs the question(s)...
1.) do I run an oil soaked patch over the top of the smooth kote when she's away in the gun locker
2.) do I simply not bother with SK and go back to good old gun oil
3.) if the answer to 2 is 'yes' how do I completely strip all the SK from my barrel with the minimum amount of effort?
Also.......
You seem to have contradicted yoursel in your post (sorry if I've misunderstood)
You say (and my reason for using it in the first place) that the point of SK is to reduce fouling... and thus, to my mind, increase shot intervals between cleaning.. I personally haven't got the patience or inclination to clean after every 10-20 rounds like some of my buddies... 1-200 is more like it and even then it's a chore! my TRG is still tack driving at that point but feel I 'should' clean at that point rather than 'need' to clean. On the last clean I could see absolutely no sign of copper fouling (after 230 rds) but then, the patches were coming out black from the SK so may have been hidden in that!
But...
Then you go on to say that the advantages are more with hot loads (can see that but doesn't apply to me) or comps where frequent cleaning is possible... that seems to defeat the whole purpose of the product?
Paul