Re: SPEED LOCK FIRING PIN and SPRING
Frank; Really? Your point misses the point. We agree a projectile impacts relative to the direction the muzzle was pointed at the time of muzzle exit. Let the point in time the striker is released (event-1) and the point in time of muzzle exit (event-2) be function A, for example. Let movement of the rifle in that interim period between event 1 and 2 be function B, for example. Depending on shooter position, skill, etc., B varies. When time between event 1 and 2 is shorter function "A" is less adverse to accuracy. An offhand shooter, for example, will experience generally more movement during "A" than a prone shooter, generally. Time between striker release and ignition of the primer is lock time. When lock time is more brief, and the shooter has achieved release of the hammer or striker while the muzzle covers the intended target, a desired hit may occur, factors like wind being favorable. Follow-through is not ignored.
How could we argue with David Tubb? I know he tried a sniper match and didn't win but that's probably due to experienced gaming, in my opinion, being important to winning in addition to luck and good shooting. Seems logical and practical that faster lock time is better. Why is a faster hammer a major design feature of the Giessele Ar trigger?<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you follow through on the trigger it is a complete non-issue, because with follow through there is no movement. It is when your finger comes off the trigger during firing you have movement, which means improper form that a few milliseconds won't fix.
As well true lock time is the the it takes the shooter to make the decision to fire until the time he actually presses the trigger. We see evidence of this with moving targets. Two shooters, same target, same hit rate but different leads.
Basically a waste of money. </div></div>