Rifle Scopes SWFA 10X42 HD Parallax Cat Tail

G17C

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 17, 2012
140
85
71
NH
For the $$ invested, I have been quite pleased with the SWFA 10X42 HD scope with its durable, high quality construction and quite-decent glass. I figure I would have to spend two to three times more on a variable-power scope to retain the build quality and robustness, and gain some worthy features I would value such as an illuminated reticle, side focus and turret stops. However, I'm not at a point where I could justify such an expenditure.

The lack of built-in turret stop have been addressed with an easy-to-install shim kit, which serves the purpose.

Up until now, by far my biggest gripe with this scope is its difficult-to-turn parallax adjustment ring, located on the back of the scope just in front of the eye piece. The ring is somewhat stiff, but the problem is mostly due to the poor design of the ring, which I find almost impossible to adjust when positioned behind the rifle. IMO, this ring should have been made larger in diameter with some aggressive knurling. I contacted SWFA a few years ago to see if any of their cat tails for their variable power scopes would fit, but was informed that none would and there were no plans to make one.

This past week I came back around to trying to find a solution to this. I went to the MGM Switchview site and after some measuring found that their 172-176 model looked like it would fit, so I ordered it from Midway. The cat tail arrived yesterday and I installed it;

700custom-12.jpg


It's a perfect fit when installed on the rear edge of the ring. The rear edge of the tapered ring has a small flat area, just enough for the cat tail to lock on straight and tight. I positioned the lever at around the 50 yard mark on the ring, which places the lever at about the 8 o'clock position when set at infinity and at about 10 o'clock with it set to 100 yards (when viewed from behind). This makes the cat tail easy to reach with the support hand, with about 30 degrees of throw from 100 yards to infinity.

The cat tail is just what was needed: the parallax can now be easily adjusted, even when set up behind the rifle in the prone position!

If anyone else is struggling with turning the parallax adjustment ring on the SWFA 10X42 HD scope, I have found the MGM Switchview 172-176 to be a viable solution.
 
Nice solution for the cat tail.

Unfortunately SWFA doesn't seem interested in keeping up with current scope markets. Their last big/new release was the 1-6x and 5-20x HD line and the 3-15x in the classic line (couple of minor reticle variations offered) and that was what, 2013, 2014?

I'd love to see a SWFA 4/5-24/30x HD scope with a MilQuad Christmas tree floating dot reticle, side focus, zero stop, 10mil knobs, 10 meter parallax, 30+ MIL elevation, built in cat tail product offered. Problem is it Doesn't seem like their focus is on scopes anymore, they went full FFL selling guns and ammo and everything else under the sun, and also some scopes too.
 
Do you know if the HD model has the same parallax dimensions as the standard model. I’d LOVE on on my classic 10x42.

The OD of the parallax ring on the HD model measures 1.735" and the MGM Switchview cat tail is advertised to fit from 1.720" to 1.760". You will need to measure the OD on yours with a set of calipers and then see if MGM offers one that will fit it.

Unfortunately SWFA doesn't seem interested in keeping up with current scope markets. Their last big/new release was the 1-6x and 5-20x HD line and the 3-15x in the classic line (couple of minor reticle variations offered) and that was what, 2013, 2014?.

Their own line of SS scopes have been well received. They seem to hit the right balance of ruggedness and durability vs. features, where so many scopes today favor the features end of the scale. With all of the low-cost/high-feature scopes hitting the market, perhaps they see their market share dwindling. Perhaps there are not many of us left who would prefer a robust scope that we can depend on instead of something more fragile but with all the bells and whistles. As I stated in my original post, I believe I would have to spend well north of $2k to get a variable with the same build quality (and durability) as the $800 SWFA 10X42 HD.

No doubt I'll be holding on to mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PBWalsh
G17C,

I don't really know very much about the fixed SWFA scopes, except there reputation from the late 90's. How does the HD differ from the half it's price classic M version, or the $100 less version of that? The M seems to have the more desirable side parallax adjustment, where the cheapest ($300) and the most expensive ($800), do not. 5 mill turrets on the HD as well, or not?

I gather that the HD has better glass and better turrets, but tunnels more. What does any of that mean on a practical level?
 
Last edited:
Nice solution for the cat tail.

Unfortunately SWFA doesn't seem interested in keeping up with current scope markets. Their last big/new release was the 1-6x and 5-20x HD line and the 3-15x in the classic line (couple of minor reticle variations offered) and that was what, 2013, 2014?

I'd love to see a SWFA 4/5-24/30x HD scope with a MilQuad Christmas tree floating dot reticle, side focus, zero stop, 10mil knobs, 10 meter parallax, 30+ MIL elevation, built in cat tail product offered. Problem is it Doesn't seem like their focus is on scopes anymore, they went full FFL selling guns and ammo and everything else under the sun, and also some scopes too.

They built a huge new building, so they have space to do a lot more than they used to.

They did not abandon the optics market, but they also tend to do things slowly and carefully.

I have heard a rumor that they are working on introducing some new stuff, but I do not have any timelines.

ILya
 
  • Like
Reactions: PBWalsh
G17C,

I don't really know very much about the fixed SWFA scopes, except there reputation from the late 90's. How does the HD differ from the half it's price classic M version, or the $100 less version of that? The M seems to have the more desirable side parallax adjustment, where the cheapest ($300) and the most expensive ($800), do not. 5 mill turrets on the HD as well, or not?

I gather that the HD has better glass and better turrets, but tunnels more. What does any of that mean on a practical level?

The HD version has better optics (considerably improved contrast) and better turrets with more solid feel. Those are 5 mrad turrets.

I have been after them for years to make a couple more HD scopes including a 10x50 with illuminated reticle and 10 mrad knobs, but I suspect that the market for that scope is too small. We really live in a world of variable scopes. I would buy that scope in a heartbeat.

ILya
 
  • Like
Reactions: PBWalsh and G17C
I gather that the HD has better glass and better turrets, but tunnels more. What does any of that mean on a practical level?

I never owned the non-HD version so I can not make any first-hand comparisons. The consensus based on Internet reviews is improved glass, better turret feel, single screw securing the turret knobs and dead-on tracking. It is made in Japan (not sure about the non-HD version).

I have been after them for years to make a couple more HD scopes including a 10x50 with illuminated reticle and 10 mrad knobs, but I suspect that the market for that scope is too small. We really live in a world of variable scopes. I would buy that scope in a heartbeat.

As would I.
 
Non-HD versions have stupid good tracking and are also made in Japan, that I can say.

@koshkin

Think we could see if we got enough people to commit to a 10x50 with an MSRish reticle they’d bite?

Thinking:
10x50 HD
Zero Stop
non-illuminated MSR-2 reticle (I’ll take a Mil-Quad if I had too)
under 13”
10mil turrets
sub 30oz with a Stainless Steel body
25m - Infinity parallax (on the side or behind) Capped or locking windage.

I’d buy one for about $1000-$1500 without question.
 
Non-HD versions have stupid good tracking and are also made in Japan, that I can say.

@koshkin

Think we could see if we got enough people to commit to a 10x50 with an MSRish reticle they’d bite?

Thinking:
10x50 HD
Zero Stop
non-illuminated MSR-2 reticle (I’ll take a Mil-Quad if I had too)
under 13”
10mil turrets
sub 30oz with a Stainless Steel body
25m - Infinity parallax (on the side or behind) Capped or locking windage.

I’d buy one for about $1000-$1500 without question.


I do not think that all three of us would constitute enough of a market, but if you are sufficiently interested, start collecting signatures. If SWFA is not interested, maybe we can get some other maker to bite.

Out of curiosity, why stainless steel body? I much prefer aluminum for a scope body. Modern aluminum alloys work exceedingly well for riflescope.

ILya
 
Idk, I feel (hugely subjective) that SS would be more durable that aluminum. I know zero about the physical properies or breaking strength or either metal. Thats just me being “steel or more better” and possibly foolish.

Yeah, 3 aint much. I’ve thought about other companies, feel like SWFA, or a 10x50 in the Razor G2 body.

I say that but have never ACTUALLY done anything hard enough to damage an aluminum body.

Might start another thread about signatures, never thought of it that way.

Anyhoo, looks like I need to measure my scope and see if MK makes a throw lever that’d fit!
 
Honestly, a fixed 10x is a good all-around use scope, but if they made the 5-20x with the above features (MSR type reticle, 10mil turret, zero stop, under 30oz, 25m - infinity parallax (I'd prefer a 10m for rimfire use, but I understand there are limits) and shorter with a sun shade for when it's needed), I'd buy one before I bought a fixed 10x. The 5-20x is just about as robust (though clearly more complex internally, by necessity), and would offer a more versatile package.

But if they can pull that off, count me in, haha. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: PBWalsh
I have been after them for years to make a couple more HD scopes including a 10x50 with illuminated reticle and 10 mrad knobs, but I suspect that the market for that scope is too small. We really live in a world of variable scopes. I would buy that scope in a heartbeat.

ILya

I’d be all over an SWFA of this description. Might actually try one of their 5-20 HDs if they’d put a zero stop in it.

John