Taliban marksmanship sucks.

Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

The picture is very interesting, it seems as though they are doing some sort of marksmanship training, but everyone has rifles except for the guy with an RPG!
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Michael N</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks for pointing out what they need to work on . Hopefully none of them read the NY Times . </div></div>

They literally think that allah steers bullets to the target. They don't "work" on marksmanship at all.
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Downzero</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Michael N</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks for pointing out what they need to work on . Hopefully none of them read the NY Times . </div></div>

They literally think that allah steers bullets to the target. They don't "work" on marksmanship at all. </div></div>

So true
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

Reading is way harder than shooting... if these dudes can't shoot, don't think they are literate. An ustadz or imam could literally stand up holding a piece of paper and say, "This says American soldiers are all war-demons from Mars." And after they asked what Mars is, they'd believe the dude.

What impresses me about the article is that the reporter actually tried to get in the weeds about various weapons systems and realities on the ground. That's rare, and I applaud it. Granted, he isn't reporting anything US troops don't already know, just illuminating data to the public at large. I think it's good for the hippies to actually realize there's a science to warfighting.

As an aside, I love that zombie video, Chiller.
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

new guy here

so i'll tread lightly

but considering i've walked that same ground...i'll add this

while many of the local taliban might not be worth crap on a technical perspective...they are motivated

never under estimate a motivated idiot

also many of the foriegn fighters...those out of the former yugo area and chechens in particular are actually effective in small numbers and as snipers

i have two dead friends from chechen sniper fire

never underestimate your enemy...and articles like this give one a false sense of security...but considering where it came from...
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

also that type of technical data should never be shared on open forums

what happens if they read and figure out what is wrong ...correct it

then kill more americans

is the NYT liable....i think so
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: klrb929</div><div class="ubbcode-body">also that type of technical data should never be shared on open forums

what happens if they read and figure out what is wrong ...correct it

then kill more americans

is the NYT liable....i think so

</div></div>
Sometimes Brother I think you are dead on on your assessment of the NYT and the Communist News Network. The articles are FOR the Taliban, not for the US.
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: klrb929</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

i have two dead friends from chechen sniper fire
</div></div>

I am very sorry to hear that. Hopefully one of the guys in your squad got the shooters.
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: klrb929</div><div class="ubbcode-body">never under estimate a motivated idiot
also many of the foriegn fighters...those out of the former yugo area and chechens in particular are actually effective in small numbers and as snipers
i have two dead friends from chechen sniper fire
never underestimate your enemy...</div></div>Nice first post. Interesting. Can't say that I disagree.
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

i was trying to stay away from a potentially political first post with my assessment of the NYT

but for them not for us is probably the most accurate statement of our media... i have a story about A-stan and Time magazine that epitomizes that crap

as for the yugos and chechens

the bad guys hire out for talent like we do...now AL-Q doesnt pay like BW or TC does ... but they pay enough to draw chechens away from killing russians in their homeland

now my buddies who got killed by the snipers ...they got one right then and there... not the other...the one that got away i guess got hooked up later ...but no way to prove it was him other than the high spec of the weapon used...but many of these bad guys bring their own stuff

and its not some stamped chicom ak POS
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

Guys I dont believe a fucking word of that shit article.

Dont forget one big thing.... The taliban virtually destroyed the russian army in Afganistan... With their shitty litle rifles and bad ammo...

Underestimate these guys and your dead. PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

IED'S HAVE IMPROVED.
TTP'S HAVE IMPROVED
WEAPONS HAVE IMPROVED
FUNDS ARE GETTING BIGGER
IDEOLOGIES HAVE INCREASED.
RECRUITMENT HAS IMPROVED.

Remember another very important thing. We are on their turf. They know the country, every nook and hole.

Think about this. These guys are willing to drive a car or truck packed with explosives into patrols/bases and detonate it killing themselves and everyone else that they can. and they dont give a flying fuck ! Now can anyone else say they are willing to do this.

yeah, Underestimate them as a fighting force and you may as well pick out the suit now you want to be buried in when they get your body home !
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eddieo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Guys I dont believe a fucking word of that shit article.

Dont forget one big thing.... The taliban virtually destroyed the russian army in Afganistan... With their shitty litle rifles and bad ammo...

Underestimate these guys and your dead. PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

IED'S HAVE IMPROVED.
TTP'S HAVE IMPROVED
WEAPONS HAVE IMPROVED
FUNDS ARE GETTING BIGGER
IDEOLOGIES HAVE INCREASED.
RECRUITMENT HAS IMPROVED.

Remember another very important thing. We are on their turf. They know the country, every nook and hole.

Think about this. These guys are willing to drive a car or truck packed with explosives into patrols/bases and detonate it killing themselves and everyone else that they can. and they dont give a flying fuck ! Now can anyone else say they are willing to do this.

yeah, Underestimate them as a fighting force and you may as well pick out the suit now you want to be buried in when they get your body home !</div></div>

+1, shooting is but a small part of their repertoire, and they knows their strengths.
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

The Taliban might be chock full of poor, illiterate, idiotic idealogues, but Iran has more than their share of rich, literate, idiotic idealogues.

If the Iranians haven't taken it upon themselves to establish and fund an improved marksmanship program for foreign "guests," I'd be amazed.

This article will get Americans killed.
 
Re: Taliban marksmanship sucks.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: klrb929</div><div class="ubbcode-body">new guy here

so i'll tread lightly

but considering i've walked that same ground...i'll add this

while many of the local taliban might not be worth crap on a technical perspective...they are motivated

never under estimate a motivated idiot

also many of the foriegn fighters...those out of the former yugo area and chechens in particular are actually effective in small numbers and as snipers

i have two dead friends from chechen sniper fire

never underestimate your enemy...and articles like this give one a false sense of security...but considering where it came from... </div></div>

+1. i too can garentee that some of thoughs boys can shoot.

ps: i love the "never under estimate a motivated idiot", very true