Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!
Create a channel Learn moreI have never been a Horus ret fan either but it allows for a lot of hold over. Looking scope to go on 300 NM beyond 2000.
Why would I change your mind? They do suck. I could live with XR though, very reminiscent of a SKMR 3. But H59, nope. I started with those and I’ll never go back.
I just recently got a TT w/H59Anybody had any experience the 3XR and h 59 rets?
On paper it doesn't seem like it's all that big but once behind the scope it looks huge.
I liked everything about the gen3xr except the center aiming dot. On paper it doesn't seem like it's all that big but once behind the scope it looks huge.
The lack of 0.2mil subtensions in the horizontal has left me thinking differently about wind holds and I actually think it is quicker than having the precision of 0.2mil holds. Previously I have used the MR4/SKMR3/EBR-7B and having to count out the subtensions takes some time.
Night force has the XtR, not Horus.I have a strong preference for tree reticles like the EBR-2C, Gen 3XR, MR4, etc. However, I strongly dislike Horus reticles. I've spent a lot of time with them and do not like them. That basically immediately takes Nightforce, Leupold and S&B out of the list of scopes I am willing to pay money for. That is not a reflection of the quality of these scopes, but the only tree reticles they offer are from Horus and that is a no go for me. That cuts the field in half, right there.
I personally hate Christmas tree reticles but if I were forced to use one, the Gen 3XR is probably the only one I would even remotely consider.