Re: Target & Hunting Scope Combination
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: azimutha</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There aren't any scopes I know of under $1000 that will 1) give you enough clarity to see bullet holes @ 400 yards and 2) still have low-end magnification suitable for close-in hunting. If you are rough on your equipment, save a few more bucks and get a Super Sniper 3-9X for $599. The glass is pretty good and the features, tracking and durability match scopes costing far more.
It doesn't cost that much to get a spotting scope capable of seeing .308 holes at 400. Often enough, good optics are overcome by mirage anyway. While it's tempting to get a scope that can handle all these things, you end up having to carry the extra weight and deal with the larger size even when you don't need it. That's most of the time, especially when hunting. </div></div>
+1
I do not believe the answer to all situations is more scope- a scope is an instrument for precision rifle fire- not spotting. The trade off to be able to use your scope to spot holes at distance is a MUCH larger, heavier and more expensive scope- and if you don't need this ability 100% of the time, you're better served to get a scope of more practical size and pick up a spotting scope for your part-time range use.
Smaller, light scope is what's in order here
Let me give you an example--- In the next year I plan on buying a new bolt action hunting rifle in .308- something a bit on the higher end with wood stock, but will still group MOA. I'm looking at topping it off with a USO SN-4 1.5-6x28 or SN-3 1.8-10x37. I even think the SN-3 is on the large side for what a hunting rifle for deer in the midwest really needs. Why not something bigger? Because that means more weight, more bulk and more money... when I simply do not need it.