Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!
Join contest SubscribeThere is a good chance it will change the zero. Not guaranteed but a good chance.I suppose I should be more clear about what I’m doing. I’m pulling the stock to clean rust on an old rifle and then putting it back on. Will it still change much? I will obviously confirm, but if I don’t have chance to, I don’t want anything unexpected.
will you be able to put it back in and kill a deer at 100y without confirming zero? most likelyI suppose I should be more clear about what I’m doing. I’m pulling the stock to clean rust on an old rifle and then putting it back on. Will it still change much? I will obviously confirm, but if I don’t have chance to, I don’t want anything unexpected.
Did you remove the scope mount? Same loss of zero factor removing optics/mounts as wellThank you very much. That was my main question was how dramatic it would be. I would leave it alone, but there was rust under the previous scope mount and I can’t stand to let the rifle have any on it. I have a sneaky suspicion that there is probably a little under the action.
Likely will change zero. Especially if it’s an unneeded or non pillar stock. To get the closest you can go zero be sure the recoil lug is seared against the stock. Attempting to match the current torque on the action bolts will help as well
Likely will change zero. Especially if it’s an unneeded or non pillar stock. To get the closest you can go zero be sure the recoil lug is seared against the stock. Attempting to match the current torque on the action bolts will help as well
Rifle is a R700 varmint synthetic circa 1995.
I guess I’m not familiar with the model he’s using. I see your post above. Is this a pillared HS stock in these guns? If so the shift should be minimal but checked anyways. I guess I assumed it’s a cheap factory plastic stock65in lb front.
45 rear.
You should be fine
I replaced the previous mount with a one piece and zeroed the rifle since then.Did you remove the scope mount? Same loss of zero factor removing optics/mounts as well
Identical to that. I put a one piece mount and Vortex glass on it though. I also painted mine just because.65in lb front.
45 rear.
You should be
Like this one?
All circa '95 stuff and it all still works.
View attachment 7704982
It has an HS Precision stock and the barreled action is identical to the 700PSS. Its an older model no longer in production.I guess I’m not familiar with the model he’s using. I see your post above. Is this a pillared HS stock in these guns? If so the shift should be minimal but checked anyways. I guess I assumed it’s a cheap factory plastic stock
Sorry I say pillars but bedding block is what I was referring to. As long as he matches up the torque then it should be very close. I’ve removed HS stock’s several times when gun were wet. Retained zero after. But I torque exactly the same each time and ensure the recoil lug is tight against the stock when I put back togetherH-S stocks use a bedding block.
Manners calls it a mini chassis.
The block is very repeatable.
Can't speak for his scope mounts.
If it's a rail, it'll probably be fine. If it's the old Leupold/ Redfield style, all bets are off on it retaining zero.
I used blue LT on the rail screws and the ring screws when I mounted the scope.Totally agree.
Also, OP, don't forget your locktite on the rail screw threads.
Modern heavier scopes will loosen them.
Ask me how I know...
View attachment 7704997
Torqued to these specs and it doesn’t feel like much. I guess I’m a little heavy handed on other things, but it feels like it should be heavier in the rear?I guess I’m not familiar with the model he’s using. I see your post above. Is this a pillared HS stock in these guns? If so the shift should be minimal but checked anyways. I guess I assumed it’s a cheap factory plastic stock
I've always used 65 in/lbs both front and rear on HS Precision stocks.Torqued to these specs and it doesn’t feel like much. I guess I’m a little heavy handed on other things, but it feels like it should be heavier in the rear?
SameI've always used 65 in/lbs both front and rear on HS Precision stocks.
I did the same on my old b & c stock with an aluminum bedding block.I've always used 65 in/lbs both front and rear on HS Precision stocks.