Latest activity

armorpl8chikn · 2025-05-03T14:35:19-0400

Lawless said:
Login to view embedded media

This is everything i have come to expect....from you people.

bulldog_b · 2025-05-03T14:34:34-0400

hankpac · 2025-05-03T14:28:14-0400

Detroit_1 said:
Login to view embedded media

The Kalgeri Plan is a (biblically) OLD concept.

See “ Liberia”. We gave them their own country. They didn’t go.

Joe A · 2025-05-03T14:26:38-0400

RAVAGE88 said:
Patent pending should have ceased shortly into the Gen 2 production. I’d have to look at specifically when that was, but the only receivers manufactured to either of the two issued patents were all of Gen 1 and not many of the Gen 2.

MB

I have a Gen 1 with no patent pending on it #22xx I purchased September of 2019 did the later Gen 1 not have patent pending ?

hankpac · 2025-05-03T14:26:08-0400

BurtG said:
View attachment 8673444

Before the narrative gains traction, the red eye, mask or not, lizard or not, is a subconjunctival hematoma. Could happen to anyone. No BFD.

Long Range 338 · 2025-05-03T14:23:34-0400

vh20 said:
Very true. I have a Terrapin-X, and a buddy got an Sig Kilo 10K. We were ranging the same targets one day with them. At distances around 1000 yds, he was getting consistently about 4-5 yds more than me. At around a mile to 2000 yds it was 9-10 yds more than mine (that's enough to put you way off on your solution).

So, back at my own range with multiple targets out to 1626 yds, we had them professionally surveyed with modern surveying equipment that is accurate to about 0.5 inches. So now we have KNOWN distances that we can use to test range finders. It turned out that my farthest target (1626.27 yds in the survey), ranged consistently (and still does) at 1625 with the Terrapin-X, and 1635 with the Sig 10K. He sent the 10K back to Sig, they sent him a new one. It was better, but still off by 5 yds.

The Terrapin-X error shrinks to less than a yard at distances around 1200 or less. I assume that error grows to probably around -2 yards by the time you're out to 2100-ish, but can't confirm because we don't have anything surveyed that far. I'm just extrapolating the error at shorter distances to arrive at that figure - 0.5 yds short at 1219, 1 yard short at 1626, so presumably 2 yards short at 2100.

Here's the FUNNY part. He bought the 10K because he had an Sig Kilo 2400 that wouldn't range small targets much past 1000. Once we got the survey done, he tested it and accidentally found out that if he aimed the reticle a certain distance to the left (I think it was left), all of a sudden it started picking up all those targets he couldn't range before, AND, it was the most accurate of ALL the ones we tested - dead on (to the nearest whole-yard) with the surveyed distances at 740.xx, 1147.xx, 1219.xx and 1626.xx yards. He sold the 10K and knows how much "windage" to hold on the Kilo 2400 to account for the beam/reticle misalignment and get accurate returns from the target.

Great info. I’ve found this to be true at different locations/trainings/matches where distances are given as my ballistics are trued to the specific rangefinder I am using. So if my rangefinder says 1250 yards and the given range is 1238 yards, I know I have to use my rangefinders given range for the “true” dope. Even if my rangefinder is the faulty unit, my ballistic profile is trued to it.

Darryle · 2025-05-03T14:22:05-0400

diverdon said:
Stories I would care to see more than this.

--A Dog and his Diarrhea
--Sarah's kitten gets lost
--that time I passed out drunk and woke up hung over and covered in puke.
-- A pictorial history of the kitchen sink

Pics of #3

Coejro · 2025-05-03T14:20:59-0400

It’s faster to just report and give detailed nots on why it’s a scammer. Leaving the negative doesn’t do anything other than potentially open you up for the scammer to drop retaliatory. I understand why guys are doing it, so go ahead if you want.

But I’ve found mod response to a detailed note, like: “hacked/scammed account. Responded to my post that I would take the item even though they weren’t the OP. Asked for payment to overseas PayPal…” usually gets a banhammer very quick. A report like “scammer” or “tried to scam me” just don’t relay enough information for a quick ban.

91Eunozs · 2025-05-03T14:17:39-0400

theLBC said:
Login to view embedded media

(Stolen) Elections have consequences

tangloppen · 2025-05-03T14:16:27-0400

So, essentially a glorified tacticool Burris Eliminator/Swarovski DS?

021411 · 2025-05-03T14:12:13-0400

David Lott said:
VGWTxxxx Previous ownership FFL marking variance

So you mean it could be worth more on the secondary market?

abn_surfer · 2025-05-03T13:48:32-0400

Price lowered

Dirty D · 2025-05-03T13:45:23-0400

stanley_white · 2025-05-03T13:33:30-0400

I have never and will never own a 320 but I truly, unhealthily look forward to the continuing saga of “GBRS vs The Internet” on this topic.

-Stan

Rob01 · 2025-05-03T13:32:42-0400

lash said:
I knew that statement would bring you in.

View attachment 8678466

You got my holding ass on that hook! lol

secondofangle2 · 2025-05-03T13:31:13-0400

^fascinating report

Rob01 · 2025-05-03T13:30:58-0400

RAVAGE88 said:
Is your Gen 2 marked Patent Pending?

MB

Will check when I get home.

Movistar · 2025-05-03T13:28:35-0400

Have you shot a 6CM AXSR with a TBAC can? Ain’t no recoil to be found

st1650 · 2025-05-03T13:22:12-0400

748rpilot said:
There are two different problems.

First, OOB detonations causing the grip module to blow up. This is thought to be caused primarily by the disconnector that connects before the action is in battery, and a barrel with an unsupported chamber. The chamber problem is similar to early Glock, and I've read to a worse extent. Apparently the disconnector wears with use and makes this more likely.

The second problem is the uncommanded discharge. To my knowledge, the exact cause of this is not fully known. From what I have read, it's likely cause is a multitude of manufacturing issues. First, many of the parts are MIM and when viewed under a microscope, are rather rough. Along with this, allegedly the QA/QC is sub-par, many of the parts made in India, and tolerance stacking becomes an issue. Second, another theory I've read is that between the cast, not forged, FCU chassis, and the polymer grip module, pressure on the frame & slide can, in conjunction with tolerance stacking, cause them to twist/deform slightly and release the striker.

For awhile the UD was allegedly to be related to a specific Safariland holster that put too much pressure on the side of the slide, but the UDs have continued with other holsters.

Obligatory: I don't know anything about manufacturing, small arms design or gunsmithing. This is all what I've read from 3rd parties as a p320 owner.

There’s a video you can test if your P320 is more at risk of dropping the striker
Login to view embedded media
The other thing I’ve seen is that if you get it out of battery slightly, with some combinations of factors when the slide goes back in the battery (maybe due to shifting weight, side impact, etc) it drops the striker. So if you had a holster that maybe didn’t quite fit perfectly and could put pressure on the wml and slightly unlock the slide, you’d be at risk of UD.

All in all it’s very rare but it’s also very real.

Dirty D · 2025-05-03T13:20:36-0400

Snake-Eyes said:
“Marvin”.

What kind of pretentious ass is named Marc with a “c”?

Anyway, every kid who entered this world on Killdozer Day turns 21 in a month.

View attachment 8678303

View attachment 8678304

View attachment 8678305

View attachment 8678306

I typed Marv and autocorrect helped me out

notacos4u · 2025-05-03T13:19:18-0400

Out of the 4, which would you purchase and why? Obviously, I want ballistic ability within the package. I am new to this, so I don’t know what I don’t know, but would prefer not to have to purchase another one because I’m disappointed in the performance of the device, or the image sucks. Would you also need to still purchase a Kestrel to pair to work with them? Make Recommendations like you were talking to a functional idiot, because I’ve been led to believe I am. Please let me know the pros and cons of your recommendations. Thanks

Dirty D · 2025-05-03T13:19:10-0400

carbonbased said:
Turdcutter baby, me, @Dirty D and all the filthy gang still love you man

I have my own goat rodeo thank you very much, you can leave me out of this one.

Now if you’ll ’Scuse me imma go be poor somewhere else.

912173 · 2025-05-03T13:18:16-0400

I wonder how the porous parts handle high rate of fire. I don't know what rate of fire they are expected to handle but I could see that getting hot enough to melt. I think the cleaning part wouldn't be too bad as long as you figure out a good routine and don't let it get too nasty beforehand.

BCP · 2025-05-03T13:17:31-0400

Threads is another one

Latest activity

Latest activity

Filter