• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

Filter

DeLane Development Group Rimfire Ventures

I’m not privy to those details, but the internet suggests 1.14 inches at 100 meters is the smallest group fired at a Lapua facility. I can’t confirm, but this is like over upwards of 25 or more shots.
I’ll dig a little more for better info.
I want to say I've seen groups at the test center in the area of 10mm at 50m for 25 or more shots, so definitely out of rifles considered to be a cut above.

MB
We have had great success in getting 11.5 - 12 mm 10 shot groups out of quite a few rifles (13 twist 1.250 Mullerworks). I think once ammo starts to get consistent, we will see better 10 shot and 20-shot groups. 20mm 100 yard groups are attainable and all this with Repeaters, some Vudoo and Rim x. I think the barrels have come a long way, we have certainly learned a few things to gain repeated accuracy. I would be curious how much better the results could get with a precision-minded specific action. I have one 10.9 MM single-shot Vudoo with a 1.250 16 twist Mullerworks. Maybe Mike can pull something out of his hat to see how good a .22 can be.
I have been told By David Tubb that his friend Lones wigger had a legit 6 mm .22 and that was a ways back so either ammo has gone to crap which I suspect is the case or???

@RAVAGE88 you're up bud :cool:

Firearms New Custom JTAC 8.6 BLK pistol featuring a Strasser straight-pull action and an 8-inch Faxon barrel

Custom JTAC 8.6 BLK pistol with a Strasser RS700 straight-pull action and an 8-inch Faxon barrel. Only 10-20 SUBSONIC rounds were fired. $3000 shipped to your FFL, or trade for either a ZCO or a Kahles K328i/K540i scope. Interested in models with Christmas tree reticles.

Essentially, it’s a much cooler version of Gunwerks' "The Accountant" rifle, priced at $13,500 but available for a fraction of that cost.

Attachments

  • IMG_4230.jpeg
    3.9 MB · Views: 87
  • IMG_4229.jpeg
    4.1 MB · Views: 50
  • 74319319179__0B10582C-183E-4C20-BAD1-85A24B15FD81.jpeg
    74319319179__0B10582C-183E-4C20-BAD1-85A24B15FD81.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 172
  • IMG_4299.jpeg
    IMG_4299.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 171
  • IMG_4302.jpeg
    IMG_4302.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 172

Silencer Central, if true Phuck them!

Personally, I have never bought metal by the pound. That's how scrap is sold. New metal suppliers sell shapes and materials cut to length. Nobody says, "I want to make a shaft extension for a motor, so I guess I'll take three pounds." I've always told dealers to cut this or that length. I give them lists. I've never seen a scale at a retail dealer's business. Just band saws.

It seems odd that you mentioned weight. Maybe you know something I don't. Maybe Silencer Central buys so much titanium, they weigh it on truck scales.
If you've purchased metal you've paid by the pound even if you don't realize it. The vendor has a chart that shows weight per foot

Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

Yet another way is Jesus, god and the holy spirit are simultaneously three separate "persons/individuals" but one "being" or one "power". So not entirely separate and not modal. Existing in all three forms simultaneously but as one.
All this shows that we need to have a metric for understanding truth other than someone's sole interpretation. The validity or “truth” of an interpretation depends on how close the interpretation is to what the other of the text meant, better know as the author’s intent. This venture of trying to understand this is called herminutics.

Also it is not one dude in many bodies. The only person of the Godhead that had a body was the Son/Jesus, and that is because he joined his nature/substance to our human substance. That is why Jesus is both God and Man. Also it is the only way salvation makes sense. Jesus as man lived a perfect life as a man thus redeeming us. Yet he wasn’t able to do it solely as a man and his divine nature is what allowed him to live a sinless life

Also what is valuable in understanding the right interpretation know what the interpretation of the text was at that time and through history. There have been a lot of movements called Christianity in the US over the past few centuries. Problem is they are not really Connected to what the church has believed through time. Yes there has been schisms and breaks through the 2000 year history, but what all Christian denominations and sects have believed through time is the Trinitarian understanding. This is a historically verifiable fact. I would encourage you to study more on this: church history and historical theology. I’ll post a link to something below with a whole series on this.

Also what I quoted from you is close to what what a Trinitarian view is, as articulated by the church through time. Articulating with precision is important as specific language was chosen for a reason. But the idea of three persons in one power is not the right understanding. God is not a power, he is a personal being with a will. If you are up for it, watch this guys series on the councils.

Login to view embedded media