Firearms WTS LMT MWS 12.5 upper with 16 inch 308 barrel//will split/price drop
- Buy - Sell - Trade
- 5 Replies
Price drop-625 shipped for the upper
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!
Join contest SubscribeYep.... Magpul and a $90.00 Larue... No difference.Shoot, if Craddock put it together, give them a call.
My knee jerk is that rounds are getting buggered up during cycling. Chamber a round and check it before shooting it. Have you tried a different magazine?
The "TwinMill"I swear I had a Hotwheels or Matchbook toy car modeled on that!
US Infantry have no mission set in China. Maybe SOF elements securing airfields in Pacific and some dismounts pulling perimeter security for Air Defense units. USAF and USMC already do that organically within AD units though.
Air power is where it’s at, and modern tactical combat aircraft are now strategic assets, as long as they’re actually modern and not some imitation garbage.
Because of the reach of modern long range weapons, the skirmish area is so far away from any ground combatants, as to relegate legacy force structures to no real mission set.
Carrier battle groups have multiple layers of early warning and defense, so they can adjust their stand-off ranges appropriately.
USMC artillery is adjusting to a new force modernization posture where they get sling-loaded from island-to-island under cover of F-35Cs and F-35Bs, which can perform more strike-centric missions that are typically USAF and USN territory.
US Army is going more to really long range missiles, and that’s the biggest segment of the new Army defense budget. Army is at the bottom of the priority list, as it should be. I was pleasantly surprised to see that emphasis in the new budget, not retard programs like MBTs and legacy artillery or silly tracked armored vehicles that are nothing but targets on the modern battlefield.
The world has not yet seen how 5th Gen systems perform with the leash totally taken off. There have been a lot of smaller strike missions in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, with Stealth ISR conducted within Iran’s airspace as if they owned the place.
I’ll have to revisit that threadIve already done one with the SCI-20, it's in the POI Thread.
Pakistan has Chinese missile defense systems, which India has targeted and apparently hit.Can Pak fighters or cruise missiles get through India’s missile defense systems? Does Pak have missile defense?
This is 100% how I feel. I’ve built plenty Frankenstein rifles using top quality parts and they’ve all ran great. I’ve also owned a complete jp and it ran great. People fuck up tuning them.I plan on buying one eventually.
I think the JP LoMass system gets some of that bad rep because it's part of a three component system that can be adjusted and tuned. So it gets used by people who maybe don't make the best choices when tuning. They try to set the gas, buffer, and spring weights in the extreme. And I think any system that has a wide variety of adjustability can be easily misused. And it's not just the wide adjustability but it's also adjustable on both ends of the operating system. So far, in all the guns I've had JP guts in and two JP rifles, I have been able to make them very reliable. They are 3G rifles by trade and in that use the owners put way more rounds during a given match day(read: without cleaning) than a precision rifle use.
Russia has deteriorated significantly in its military industrial capacity. They always cranked out low airframe life trash, but now their fighter-manufacturing has been consolidated into a tiny building in Eastern Russia much closer to Japan than it is to Moscow. They are a shell of their former selves when it comes to MIC.yea,Russians can't build shit. the T-34 was no good at all against the German tanks of 41-43. AK is a POS that only been in use for pushing 80 years,Makarov misfired 1/2 the time,mig 15 never matched the f 86. bull shit. we and the Germans had better trained tank crew,grunts and pilots. that was the winning factor. the Germans were hugely successful at 1st but got so over extended that they had no chance to win,prob after Smolensk '41. we did feed the Russians enough to win like FDR wanted.
i keep harping on your blather. but WHY should we be involved at all in Ukraine,Caucasus or eastern Europe. you always carry on like a neocon that thinks we can,should or could control everything everywhere. protect our shinning allies and throw as many bodies into the mix as needed. seems like you believe that our MIC deserves whatever sacrifice needed to keep them fat and happy. you present a lot of facts mixed in with a lot of questionable conclusions. looks like you think pissing away trillions on foreign adventures is more important than rebuilding infrastructure here; places like Maui,NoCarolina,LA,FL. i mean,after all,keeping Z and his crew rich and powerful is what really matters.
hate to think it but it starts to look like Trump is out of his depth re foreign policy. does he want to continue to goad Russia or does he want to normalize relations? either way this mineral deal is a delusional pipe dream. he might be on to something with the tariffs. if we have China by the balls,we'll see if they keep creeping farther into the Pacific. that might be a big deal.