Niles Coyote said:

I considered a BRA but my gunsmith talked me out of it. There was nothing wrong with it he just hadn't found it to really do anything that the straight BR wouldn't do already unless you are only after speed, which I wasn't, but some folks feel differently.

Click to expand...

I would argue that it gives you more room before you reach pressure, a bit of an added safety factor and the ability to step on it a bit if you want.

FNG1001 said:

I'm running 6BRA right now and considering going back to 6BR.

Click to expand...

How come?

Rodney65 said:

Pretty small detail but I really wish Vortex staggered their .2 subtentions like a lot of other reticles.

Click to expand...

I find the .5 divider below the line makes deciphering .2 .4 .6 and .8 very intuitive.

BurtG said:

I really hope it doesn’t get to the point where vigilantes are returning the favor.

Would be awful

Click to expand...

I can't find the story, but awhile back I read a story that happened back in the 80s I think in my state where a guy was watching one of his neighbor's home while he was out of town. The guy thought he saw someone in the house and he took his gun and went to check it out. False alarm. While walking back to his house a cop rolls up on him, gets out and points his gun at him. The guy the entire time kept the gun at his waist with muzzle down and told the cop he's just walking home and then continues to walk home. Cop opens fire and the guy returns fire and kills the cop. Jury found him not guilty.

I'm obviously not advocating killing cops, but it's perfectly clear that they somehow manage to break everything written in our Bill Of Rights on a regular basis.

carbonbased said:

Huh. I don’t have the dot problem on my various Vortex scopes (.06 small dots and .09 large ones). I think they’re perfectly sized so they aren’t too obtrusive. I own the G2 w/EBR-2C and PST II’s with both the 2D and 2C variants.

But we all have different eyes, so I get it.

Do you like the NF Mil-XT dots? Small .05 and large .1 dots, so there’s a bigger differentiation. I find them a bit more intrusive in my NX8 4-32, but I’m a varmint shooter and not a competitor on the clock.

Here’s 2C (same dots as 7D) vs a Mil-xt reticle pics. 1st one is mine. Different magnifications so this is not scientific:
View attachment 8667268View attachment 8667274

And here’s some 7D a Mil-XT drawings. These are magnified quite similarly:View attachment 8667271View attachment 8667272

Click to expand...

I like the MILXT over the the EBR reticles, kinda get lost in all the vortex offerings from updateing their reticle designs over the years. I give the milxt the win for the staggered subtensions and floating dots at every mil line. If I had it my way Id make the 1 mil windage marks on the tree a small hash and either the .2 and .8 smaller or bigger than the .4 and .6 so its just faster for a brain to compute especially on a 90 second clock with 10 transitional targets. I think Bushnell has the reticle 90% there with the EQL which I like alot, just wish they had comparable glass to a ATACR or Kahles.. I haven't been behind a Gen 2 or 3 vortex in a long while so I cant compare them side by side with mine and buddies line ups. I also realize that vortex does offer. 2 subtension in tree now so I inserted my foot into mouth, Im good at that sometimes. I dont know alot of shooters that primarily hold over vs dial so I understand that Im just a few who want a really stellar reticle for hold overs.. If they offered Horus reticles on the G3 Id probably just shut up... (sure some one gonna say they offer horus reticles now)

Snuby642 said:

Time to flush another libtard down the shitter.
You should crawl back under your rock after a rinse in a car wash.

Click to expand...

how big of a fucking retard do you have to be to think anyone who disagrees with you is a libtard? You're as dense as the blue haired gender studies professors who thinks anyone who wants to cut funding to malnourished Yemenis is a literal nazi. You are actually a fucking moron.

WTF-2-EDC said:

CHINA CANNOT WITHSTAND TRUMP TRADE WAR.

China's economy is less than two-thirds the size of the American one. Last year, the U.S. produced about $29.2 trillion in gross domestic product. China's National Bureau of Statistics reported $18.8 trillion, a number almost certainly inflated.

Moreover, China is the trade-surplus economy. America's merchandise trade deficit with China hit $295.4 billion last year. That deficit is 5.8 percent greater than 2023's.

Trade-surplus countries have no ammunition in trade wars. They are the ones with everything to lose.

Xi Jinping, because he has rejected consumption, has placed almost all his bets on exports to rescue his failing economy, which did not grow at the 5 percent pace reported for last year. At the moment, indicators suggest China is in a deflationary spiral and so may not be growing at all.

Click to expand...

Normally, I would agree with you. In fact, just a few weeks ago I said that there is no way anyone will survive a trade war with the US because everyone else’s GDP is nothing compared to ours. China is the closest and is still half ours. Everyone else isn’t even in the running. However, this might be a slight miscalculation on my part as well as those in gov right now. If China was to manage to convince others around the globe to cut us out of trade completely then we would be screwed because all these normal every day things we rely on that are made somewhere else woukd no longer be available and while I 100% think we need to bring manufacturing and production back to the US, if we started today we couldn’t get things built and online fast enough. It would take 5-10 years to get anything of real value up and running here and that’s if we started today. Our gov screwed us and put us in a bad position being too reliant on these other countries long ago. Someone did a shitty job of planning ahead and it’s starting to show.

PM Sent

If you want SS HD and a compact form factor make your life easy. .45 ASP in a suppressed 1911.

theLBC said:

Click to expand...

"Comon man" he doesn't remember a damned thing. Lol

The D said:

Awesome. I had grown out of wwe by then so I never saw this. Triple H was on Andrew Schulz’s podcast that dropped a few days ago. I don’t even know how I came across it but it’s a really good episode

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

Donald Trump was on The Undertaker's podcast a few months ago. It was funny because it was suppose to be Undertaker interviewing Trump, but most of the show was Trump interviewing Undertaker.

Login to view embedded media

New Tom MacDonald
Login to view embedded media

.224 sub pull action repeater wouldn't be my first pick for fighting lol.

It will be a waste of time effort and powder if goal is a serious rifle.

and at least 22lr bullets can expand lol.

Sounds like you need a 300 blk or 9mm to be honest.

theLBC said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

I went to SAS from 92-96. All 3 of my older sisters did as well. Oldest sister graduated from there. Was good back then.

Oh and whoever we appoint in these grand positions needs to have balls. Be able to stand up and actually do shit and nowt cower down at the hint of a every little thing.