3" Sch.160 316L

MB ,
Mags and mag springs , I have seen discussions in the past about people looking into clock type springs , why won’t these work ?
It would seem to work great in theory , with all the extra space in your mag design behind the actual 22 mag column you could put the wound clock spring back there , I don’t know

Masojoh said:

Any chance that your current CZ customers will get a faster turn around time than 12 months? I appreciate what you are doing, but it looks like my $1800 is working capital for your new venture.

Click to expand...

Sad to find this out!

quoted the wrong guy.

Bump.

softcock said:

View attachment 8681699

Click to expand...

Pam Bondi is really young there!

Bump

Found a CRBN I’m going to try.

Offers?

For those who’ve owned/shot both:
Would you say the ‘03 is a more inherently accurate rifle on average than the 17(with both in standard USGI configuration)?

Offers?

Rthur said:

Ignorant little turd dispensing the propaganda of the media.
...you've been fed.


R

Click to expand...

LOL... "propaganda of the media"

We are discussing a fakepost made by a kooksite, sir.

SWEAR TO ME right now that you'll never stop being this DAMN DELISH.....

NHPiper said:

Im running a guide ta651 with a Mk5 3-18 and PMII 5-25

Click to expand...

Awesome so no issues with the low end of mag?

Forgot to mention the cock on closing of the p17 was never popular though it could be changed. The extractor was weak. That rear sight and metal around it. It was just never seen as better than much of anything.

Bump

BurtG said:

^ this love my lmos ace Douglas ar. Think I put the scs in the ridgeline too made it much smoother

Click to expand...

The problem there is the RD15 is specifically designed for full reliability and low mass system have notoriously been known for stoppages once the platform becomes compromised with fouling.

But yes they do make for a smooth shooting rifle and if you're not using it for rifle training classes or anything that will have prolong run times without cleaning they are quite enjoyable.

Probably helped that the ‘03 was readily available in National Match configuration, not to mention 1903 “T” match rifles(ain’t that what they’re called @cplnorton ?)

@168BTHPM I’ve always lusted after a Remington Model 30(but would much prefer a pre-64 or even a newer FN produced Winchester M70… or a Winchester M54!)..
what do you mean the Rem M30 ain’t nothing special? It don’t shoot very well or..?? Is it completely factory stock? Or has it been bedded, rebarrelled or anything??

I would love to get my hands on a clone of Ben Comfort’s custom 1917/Rem M30 but instead chambered in .280 Sherman or .300 Sherman(basically a 7mm/.280 Gibbs or .300 Gibbs but using .270 brass to get a little bit longer neck).

Price drop***

As reported on AR15.com

Maybe this will help...

16" barrel...
"
FPS average for each Lot listed newest to oldest based on purchase date, but the lot numbers don’t proceed in perfect order (I guess they don’t line em in the warehouse exactly by lot # ).

Lot# /FPS/ SD/Month & rnds purchased

SCT3EB241 2449 18 April2025 (200)

SCT1DL091 2537 20 March 2025 (200)

SCL3EB201 2451 29.5 Feb 2025 (200)

SCL1EA302 2515 16 Dec 2024 (200)
————————————————————————————
SCL1DK141 2610 18.5 Nov 2024 (300)

SCL3DI171 2674 18.5 Sept 2024 (600)

SCL2DG231 2601 16 July 2024 (100)

JR1200W3 said:

I had two "misfires" with .750 gas blocks

Click to expand...

That doesn't answer my question nor make any sense, "misfires" have nothing to do with the gas system.

Bump

Short action magazine?