• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Who profited from 9/11?????

Ok, let me ask you this, and I'm not being defiant. How did the steel girders get so hot at the lower floors that they could no longer bear the weight? I would think at some point the buildings would reach cooler steel below and stop falling.

Or was the shear weight of the upper building too great and floors began pancaking?
Momentum. Zero controlled demolition. But it was planned funded and carried out by Glowies
 
I am not disagreeing that fire can heat steel and make it malleable. The problem is the violation of Newton's Third Law. And that is from actual physicists who studied the event. You simply cannot have a fraction of a structure destroying the rest of it. But enjoy the fight.
One other thing

answer a few questions for me. I will lead you like the horse to water but curious if you know how to drink

1. Why do they spray fireproofing on to steel structural beams and columns in high-rise buildings?

2. Do you know what ASTM E-119 is?

3. How much does a 20ft long piece of 1” round steel bar grow when heated from 70 to 1200 degrees F? ( the formula was previously posted)

 
  • Like
Reactions: plong
Ok, let me ask you this, and I'm not being defiant. How did the steel girders get so hot at the lower floors that they could no longer bear the weight? I would think at some point the buildings would reach cooler steel below and stop falling.

Or was the shear weight of the upper building too great and floors began pancaking?
they explain it here.


If you watch footage of the collapse you can actually watch the internal steel structure fall before the outside fell. The “free fall” wack jobs... are telling lies. Look at the roof, upper left (video below)you can see a mechanical building fall then time passes other parts fall, then the exterior facade comes down. Free fall is a lie. It was a slow progressive collapse



The “ pancaking” was the towers because of the design. The exterior walls and central core were the structure with massive open floor with the load spread out across the floor trusses.

1663113627096.jpeg
 
I am not disagreeing that fire can heat steel and make it malleable. The problem is the violation of Newton's Third Law. And that is from actual physicists who studied the event. You simply cannot have a fraction of a structure destroying the rest of it. But enjoy the fight.
C2635E4C-32F9-4D41-8C6B-AA1389A329F8.jpeg
A3BFECFB-9A6C-421C-9B63-20DE5BCE0A33.jpeg
 
It was done by the same people that brought you COVID-19, stolen elections, Bernie sanders, Obama, the war on terror, 9-11, Bush II, Clinton’s, Waco, Ruby ridge, Iran contra, jfk haircut, bay of pigs, Vietnam war, Korean War, WW II, Hitler, WW I, fall of Russia, so on and so forth all the way back to the Pharisees and Sadusees to Babylon and the taking over by subversion of the original faith.

This is the war in heaven manifested in our reality.
 
It was done by the same people that brought you COVID-19, stolen elections, Bernie sanders, Obama, the war on terror, 9-11, Bush II, Clinton’s, Waco, Ruby ridge, Iran contra, jfk haircut, bay of pigs, Vietnam war, Korean War, WW II, Hitler, WW I, fall of Russia, so on and so forth all the way back to the Pharisees and Sadusees to Babylon and the taking over by subversion of the original faith.

This is the war in heaven manifested in our reality.
Who dat be's, pigeon man. Do'n be keepin us in de darks. spit it out.
 
^ I take your word for it. I witnessed it live, real time on TV.

I still find it painful to watch and don't like seeing the Towers fall.
According to NIST's admission, "Due to the effectiveness of the spray-applied fire-resistive material (SFRM) or fireproofing, the highest steel column temperatures in WTC 7 only reached an estimated 300 degrees Celsius (570 degrees Fahrenheit)..." But apparently, that is unimportant, because floor 13 lost its connection to column #79, collapsed down, which caused that column to become "unsupported" and since that "critical" column was evidently the linchpin for the entire building design, caused all the other columns to collapse near simultaneously, the entire inside of the building buckled all at once, with the outer facade falling last. Watching their wire-frame computer model of the collapse is beyond ridiculous. They also had to revise their report when some highschool teacher proved out that the building did fall at freefall speeds, when their first report refuted it, but he was able to easily disprove it. So a government agency, responsible for "expert" study and analysis, taking months to issue a report, immediately got shot down and had to revise their work...yeah, trustworthy expertise there...

And the Popular Mechanics article about the thing is just a rehash of the NIST assessment, which is practically a parody of physics and engineering principles. This episode should be a litmus test for any structural engineer, where if they actually agree to any of these explanations, should immediately be exiled from the profession.

I must admit, I often wondered what we'd get if people could really believe that what was essentially a housefire in #7 could cause a steel/concrete, modern building could collapse entirely upon itself within the span of a few hours...well now, 20 years later, idiots now believe men can get pregnant. Question answered within my lifetime!
 
It was done by the same people that brought you COVID-19, stolen elections, Bernie sanders, Obama, the war on terror, 9-11, Bush II, Clinton’s, Waco, Ruby ridge, Iran contra, jfk haircut, bay of pigs, Vietnam war, Korean War, WW II, Hitler, WW I, fall of Russia, so on and so forth all the way back to the Pharisees and Sadusees to Babylon and the taking over by subversion of the original faith.

This is the war in heaven manifested in our reality.
So basically you are saying government is a mechanism devised and used by satanists since the beginning of modern civilization to control the ignorant masses by convincing them that a handful of men know what’s best for them and if one should happen to disagree with this “truth” then they will be imprisoned or killedIs which is somehow perfectly accepted. Is that what you are basically saying. And to think naive men dedicate their lives working for gov’t to keep this lie alive while believing they are doing good by empowering evil men. Fascinating.
 
Rumsfeld had announced the day before that the defense department had been searching for a missing 2.3 trillion dollars.

Why did the missile hit that particular wing of the Pentagon?

Who had an entire floor rented in building 7?

Eisenhower was spot on.
 
There are many types of freedom. True freedom is not dependent on the physical, though being free physically is good, it comes from the heart, and the mind. I'm free because I dont give a shit. This life, in this world, is temporary. If I live I live and mostly on my own terms. At this point in time I dodnt really give a shit what they' do. If they come and kill me, then Im free of this world. Ive seen enough of what this world has to offer for several lifetimes.

some smart ass said "Fear not those who can kill the body but fear those who kill the soul."

Matthew 10:28​


“And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.”

fjb
 
Is there anything a Democrat, Biden leg humper cannot blame on a Republican? I'd have to say Nope.

What the OP is telling you in the very first post is that he supports and justifies Muslim terrorism. If he can find a way to blame anyone but the people responsible for a terrorist act, he will.

He will ignore science to justify his climate religion.

He will ignore child rape as long as the pedophile is a Biden.

He will support a man who molested his granddaughter as his president.

He will embrace the crack smoking son of the pedophile president as he fucks his own niece, his own sister-in-law and a stripper on a regular basis.

He will support their criminal acts, bribes and the selling of America to the Chinese.

And he is a fag.
 
Is there anything a Democrat, Biden leg humper cannot blame on a Republican? I'd have to say Nope.

What the OP is telling you in the very first post is that he supports and justifies Muslim terrorism. If he can find a way to blame anyone but the people responsible for a terrorist act, he will.

He will ignore science to justify his climate religion.

He will ignore child rape as long as the pedophile is a Biden.

He will support a man who molested his granddaughter as his president.

He will embrace the crack smoking son of the pedophile president as he fucks his own niece, his own sister-in-law and a stripper on a regular basis.

He will support their criminal acts, bribes and the selling of America to the Chinese.

And he is a fag.
You believe your gov’ts narrative. 😂 You shouldn’t. Uncle sam is a liar, a theif, and a murderer.

I’m assuming you took part in the “war on terror” to keep us safe while protecting the constitution. 😂
 
Now, that is what I call predictable. You lack the basic understanding of physics and resort to more trollish behavior.
U know the last guy that engaged me in a 9/11 thread was later exposed to be the biggest scammer this site has seen.

You, on the other hand, failed to answer the 3 questions which were asked. I know they, if you so choose, would expose the truth BBC thats right behind you, hunting your tight butt hole ready help you see the light, but you still seem to be stuck, tightly puckered, not engaging or adding anything of substance to the exchange of thought. Just repeating your same mantra and charging head long down the path of stupidity.

FYI... I was raised by a Physicist. He beat the basic concepts into me at a young age.

You are a liar. And a little bitch.
 
Is there anything a Democrat, Biden leg humper cannot blame on a Republican? I'd have to say Nope.

What the OP is telling you in the very first post is that he supports and justifies Muslim terrorism. If he can find a way to blame anyone but the people responsible for a terrorist act, he will.

He will ignore science to justify his climate religion.

He will ignore child rape as long as the pedophile is a Biden.

He will support a man who molested his granddaughter as his president.

He will embrace the crack smoking son of the pedophile president as he fucks his own niece, his own sister-in-law and a stripper on a regular basis.

He will support their criminal acts, bribes and the selling of America to the Chinese.

And he is a fag.


755F8A19-8247-4B0B-A09D-D4C5FAD37285.gif
 
U know the last guy that engaged me in a 9/11 thread was later exposed to be the biggest scammer this site has seen.

You, on the other hand, failed to answer the 3 questions which were asked. I know they, if you so choose, would expose the truth BBC thats right behind you, hunting your tight butt hole ready help you see the light, but you still seem to be stuck, tightly puckered, not engaging or adding anything of substance to the exchange of thought. Just repeating your same mantra and charging head long down the path of stupidity.

FYI... I was raised by a Physicist. He beat the basic concepts into me at a young age.

You are a liar. And a little bitch.
Then your physicist mentor or father failed you horribly. My condolences.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Maggot
Then your physicist mentor or father failed you horribly. My condolences.
Seriously, if you’re an expert on the matter

floor is yours

I notice you’re not sharing any information pertinent to the subject

9/11

Enlighten me...
 
Seriously, if you’re an expert on the matter

floor is yours

I notice you’re not sharing any information pertinent to the subject

9/11

Enlighten me...
p = p.

That is the shorthand for the conservation of momentum.
 
p = p.

That is the shorthand for the conservation of momentum.
I’m waiting for you to enlighten the world on your mastery of understanding what happened on 9/11. Mainly the destruction of WTC 7

So far you failed miserably.

How’s it feel to suck and not even have intestinal fortitude to admit it?
 
I’m waiting for you to enlighten the world on your mastery of understanding what happened on 9/11. Mainly the destruction of WTC 7

So far you failed miserably.

How’s it feel to suck and not even have intestinal fortitude to admit it?
And you are not interested in discussing physics, possibly because you don't understand it. As for study, it was early 1975 when my step-grandfather was giving me a high school level primer on Einstein and his theories of relativity. And teaching me the shortcut to single variable differential and integral calculus. Later, I would study multi-variable calculus. Linear algebra, n-space geometry, Riemannian space, and topology, which is set theory on steroids. I was debating a guy once who tried to say that special theory could be proven by solving hyperbolic trigonometry in a topology statement and I was pointing out that the problem with that explanation was the orthogonal nature of the sub sets. Which puts one right back at the problem Einstein had in statistical mechanics when dealing with vector analysis of particle collision, similar to Poincare's three body problem. Turns out that you have to treat large velocities as additive when he previously said they were not additive. (Sidenote: a friend of mine in the 90s was writing his doctoral thesis on chaos theory as applied to Poincare's three body problem.

I studied German in school and was able to read Einstein's auto bio notes in German and English. This was frustrating for him. Along with startling implications in quantum mechanics with associates Podolsky and Rosen in a concept called the EPR event (named for Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen.)

Electrons have a quality called spin, measured up or down. The field of devices to detect the spin will align the electron up or down. The electron on the other side of the orbit has to have the opposite spin to conserve mass and energy. But this has to happen instantaneously, violating the Special Theory of Relativity. Oopsy daisy...

Conservation of momentum. Equal and opposite reaction. A good analogy is a Toyota Camry crashing into and totally destroying 6 loaded 40 ton semi rigs. Not going to happen.

Come at me, brah.
 
And you are not interested in discussing physics, possibly because you don't understand it. As for study, it was early 1975 when my step-grandfather was giving me a high school level primer on Einstein and his theories of relativity. And teaching me the shortcut to single variable differential and integral calculus. Later, I would study multi-variable calculus. Linear algebra, n-space geometry, Riemannian space, and topology, which is set theory on steroids. I was debating a guy once who tried to say that special theory could be proven by solving hyperbolic trigonometry in a topology statement and I was pointing out that the problem with that explanation was the orthogonal nature of the sub sets. Which puts one right back at the problem Einstein had in statistical mechanics when dealing with vector analysis of particle collision, similar to Poincare's three body problem. Turns out that you have to treat large velocities as additive when he previously said they were not additive. (Sidenote: a friend of mine in the 90s was writing his doctoral thesis on chaos theory as applied to Poincare's three body problem.

I studied German in school and was able to read Einstein's auto bio notes in German and English. This was frustrating for him. Along with startling implications in quantum mechanics with associates Podolsky and Rosen in a concept called the EPR event (named for Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen.)

Electrons have a quality called spin, measured up or down. The field of devices to detect the spin will align the electron up or down. The electron on the other side of the orbit has to have the opposite spin to conserve mass and energy. But this has to happen instantaneously, violating the Special Theory of Relativity. Oopsy daisy...

Conservation of momentum. Equal and opposite reaction. A good analogy is a Toyota Camry crashing into and totally destroying 6 loaded 40 ton semi rigs. Not going to happen.

Come at me, brah.
You have added nothing on the subject.

I don’t give a fuck what you studied.

You are 100% completely wrong with the things you suggested about the destruction on 9/11.

You might want to get a refund on that education... wait... NO refunds !!!

are you gonna actually talk about the subject? Are you’re gonna keep trying to change the topic?

you’re fucking pathetic
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Barelstroker
You have added nothing on the subject.

I don’t give a fuck what you studied.

You are 100% completely wrong with the things you suggested about the destruction on 9/11.

You might want to get a refund on that education... wait... NO refunds !!!

are you gonna actually talk about the subject? Are you’re gonna keep trying to change the topic?

you’re fucking pathetic
And you seem a one trick pony. Youre so sold on youre theory you cant admit to the possibility of alternatives. Thats a sad state.

Is your theory right? I can admit to that possibility. Logic, on the other hand leads me to a different view. With all your theories, aside, if someone kicks one of you legs out from under you, youre going to fall to one side or another, unlikely you'd collapse straight down. On the other hand Ive seen videos of controlled demolition, and by golly, you know what the twin towers looked just exactly like??? a controlled demo. And there are some very shady, powerful, entities who stood to profit beyond imagination from that stroke. And Building 7?

Wake up, brah.

And you still havent answered my question. Was there more than one shooter in Dallas?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barelstroker
And you seem a one trick pony. Youre so sold on youre theory you cant admit to the possibility of alternatives. Thats a sad state.

Is your theory right? I can admit to that possibility. Logic, on the other hand leads me to a different view. With all your theories, aside, if someone kicks one of you legs out from under you, youre going to fall to one side or another, unlikely you'd collapse straight down. On the other hand Ive seen videos of controlled demolition, and by golly, you know what the twin towers looked just exactly like??? a controlled demo. And there are some very shady, powerful, entities who stood to profit beyond imagination from that stroke. And Building 7?

Wake up, brah.

And you still havent answered my question. Was there more than one shooter in Dallas?
I am wake, but its not what the thread is about. Start a JFK thread, see ya there. That’s enough of a subject not to get going in here.

I believe you have stated that you think it’s control demo? Correct

Show some proof.

I provided examples previous in the thread of descriptions of what happened. Popular mechanics an official video.

Yetnobody who seems to want to come on here and try to oppose me has presented any plausible evidence to your theroys... zero none. you guys have offered nothing other than trying to tell me I’m wrong without having anything to back it up. Then ask questions not relevant to the topic

Prove it... I will listen.

Go for it.
 
I’m still waiting for somebody to explain to me why structural steel in high-rise buildings is covered in fire proofing???

Then an understanding of how that fire proofing works.

I even Provided some ASTM guidelines...
 
I am wake, but its not what the thread is about. Start a JFK thread, see ya there. That’s enough of a subject not to get going in here.

I believe you have stated that you think it’s control demo? Correct

Show some proof.

I provided examples previous in the thread of descriptions of what happened. Popular mechanics an official video.

Yetnobody who seems to want to come on here and try to oppose me has presented any plausible evidence to your theroys... zero none. you guys have offered nothing other than trying to tell me I’m wrong without having anything to back it up. Then ask questions not relevant to the topic

Prove it... I will listen.

Go for it.
You havent proven anything, you just put up a bunch of crap that doesnt support the logical view. Youre ego and arrogance is unbecoming, and Ive wasted enough energy on this. Tata
 
You havent proven anything, you just put up a bunch of crap that doesnt support the logical view. Youre ego and arrogance is unbecoming, and Ive wasted enough energy on this. Tata
What is this logical view off yours?

Prove it.

Share...
 
You believe your gov’ts narrative. 😂 You shouldn’t. Uncle sam is a liar, a theif, and a murderer.

I’m assuming you took part in the “war on terror” to keep us safe while protecting the constitution. 😂
You keep gulping that Biden ball chowder.

I'll take Uncle Sam over Chairman Mao all fucking day long.
 
7 fell from fire and structural damage. Broken (no sprinkler) water mains, no one fighting the fire and haveing 2 110 story building s collapse and partly fall on them. These events have never before or since happened in a high rise. Partly because many of the people who would have worked to put the fires out, were killed!

Pull it means pull out. Like get everyone out and away.

I am so tired of the conspiracy nutters who think 7 was controlled demo. You are part of the problem if you believe this. There is enough bs surrounding this incident, please dont add this none sense to the pile.

Please on this day don’t start with this. Have some respect and dignity for those lost.
Hahahahaha,,,,,"Pull it" means get everybody out. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Absolutely hilarious.
You truly have absolutely zero idea.
 
It's obvious to see how you can believe the "official bullshit story"
Take some time to listen to the real experts so you don't embarrass yourself more than you have.
/watch?v=_Hf2KDiQoiI. Watch on youtube.
lol... at least you will try.

I am not wasting 45 mins of my life listening to that again. That video is filled with people lying to you.

Its really sad you think that is proof...

For example they mention the meridian bank fire in Philadelphia, there were firefighters fighting that building fire...

6BA4D879-ACDA-4A80-9DB1-2FEF97CB5B7F.jpeg


Notice were they mentioned getting out for fear of collapse.

I’m not about to go through 45 minutes of video list evidence proving what everything that was said is wrong. Its a trash puff piece, fact that you think it’s truth it’s just fucking pathetic( edited because talk to text jumbled what I said)

9/11 truther are the Dumbest motherfuckers walking amongst us
 
Last edited:
lol... at least you will try.

I am not wasting 45 mins of my life listening to that again. That video is filled with people lying to you.

Its really sad you think that is proof...

For example they mention the meridian bank fire in Philadelphia, there were firefighters fighting that building fire...

View attachment 7958480

Notice were they mentioned getting out for fear of collapse.

I’m not about to go through 45 minutes of video list evidence proving what everything that was dude said is wrong with that thing that you posted is really fucking trash the fact that you think that that’s a fact it’s pathetic and it just shows what a fucking moron you are

9/11 truther are the Dumbest motherfuckers walking amongst us
If buildings simply pulverize into their own footprint all by themselves, why do companies & cities go to the trouble & expense of specialist demolition teams? Seriously!!!
You really are a Muppet.
 
If buildings simply pulverize into their own footprint all by themselves, why do companies & cities go to the trouble & expense of specialist demolition teams? Seriously!!!
You really are a Muppet.
Light them on fire, let them burn uncontrolled. A skyscraper will come down.

Gravity pulls straight down not sideways you dumb fuck. That is not “proof” of demolition.
 
If buildings simply pulverize into their own footprint all by themselves.
Tell me more about how buildings don’t fucking fall straight down



Where are you control demo experts on this one

Oh wait some people didn’t go on YouTube and make a ignorant fucking video telling you a bunch of lies.

No wonder we had Covid lockdowns in this country you guys are fucking retarded
 
Light them on fire, let them burn uncontrolled. A skyscraper will come down.

Gravity pulls straight down not sideways you dumb fuck. That is not “proof” of demolition.
LOL,,,,,so gravity pulls the top 10% down through the lower 90%.
If we put aside the indisputable fact that any physical movement will always take the least path of resistance & not the greatest path of resistance, how does 80,000 tons of concrete & steel just turn to dust?
 
If buildings simply pulverize into their own footprint all by themselves, why do companies & cities go to the trouble & expense of specialist demolition teams? Seriously!!!
You really are a Muppet.
Also in that asinine video that you posted they’re talking about world trade center one and world trade center to falling. Sharing their lyanosis, do you notice both buildings collapsed where the airplanes hit ???

Also the tower that got hit second was impacted by an aircraft about 20 to 30 floors lower. Meaning, the compromised structure was having to support almost twice as much weight.

The building hits second... it fell first because it had more floors to support with similar damage to the structure.

So the argument is a bunch of terrorists came over here flew airplanes in the building just so the government could secretly control demo them.

Hey kids don’t eat the brown acid real deadhead chemistry is clear