• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    View thread

Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

Let me preface this with the fact I am not a Catholic, but a Bible believing Christian.



He is probably a Oneness Pentecostal or Apostolic. Either way his heresy is modalism and was condemned at Nicaea in 325 and outright rejected at Constantinople in 381. There are several wrong things have been said so here we go:



First, you are appealing to the fallacy of specificity. Yes the word Trinity does not appear in the Bible, but you know what other word doesn’t? Monotheism. Does that mean that the Christian faith isn’t monotheistic? Absolutely not. What it means is we sometimes give categorical names to theological truths we see in scripture.



Next Nicaea was not called to establish the doctrine of the Trinity, as it has its roots in ancient Judaism and the New Testament. Even the patristic fathers spoke of the Trinity. The counsel was called to address heresies that had popped up, mainly Arianism but also this heresy of modalism. The Nicene Creed was produced to officially codify into writing the long held belief of the Trinity. Ask yourself why would non-trinitarian heresies exist prior to Nicaea if the Trinity was invented at Nicaea? The fact is it goes all the way back to Jesus and had its roots in the Jewish understanding of the “Two powers in heaven” doctrine (go read up on that). Example Gen 19:24 “YHWH God rains down fire from YHWH out of heaven”



This leads to the next point you bring up, the name of Jesus. God already was named in the Old Testament and his name is YHWH (I am that I am). Since I am guessing you are a KJV only person too, everywhere in the OT where it says LORD in all capitals, that is because in Hebrew it is the divine name YHWH.



What’s funny is Jesus in Hebrew is actually Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ) or sometimes Yehoshua (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ) which literally means YHWH is salvation. So sorry Jesus isn’t somehow the revealed name of God.



Next let’s touch on some trinitarian Bible verses. Aside from the aforementioned great commission verse in Matthew 28:19, here are some more.



2 Corinthians 13:14. This verse includes a blessing that mentions the "grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit," again explicitly mentioning all three persons.



John 1:1-5 This passage describes Jesus as the Word, stating that "the Word was with God, and the Word was God." This verse emphasizes Jesus's divine nature and his co-equality with the Father



John 10:30 Jesus declares, "I and the Father are one," further reinforcing the unity of the Godhead and the divine nature of Jesus



Hebrews 1:1-4 This passage emphasizes the supremacy of Jesus, who is the "bright reflection of God's glory and the exact representation of his being



1 Corinthians 8:6 this says there “one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live.” showing the diversity and unique personhood in the Godhead



And the list goes on and on…
None of those show me how there can be three co-equal, co-eternal, co-existent gods that make up one deity? How can one God have all power but share it equally with two others? How can Jesus pre exist (as trinitarians believe) and still be born of a virgin? “I am God, and beside me there is no other.” Sounds pretty clear to me. He said that no man can see him and live, and He had to fulfill the law and the covenant so made a human body that he put on like a robe and walked this earth for 33 years and died to redeem us from our transgressions. We could get into the discussion on if Jesus could have sinned. I bet that would get entertaining.
 
“I am God, and beside me there is no other.” Sounds pretty clear to me.
That is from Isaiah 45:5, written around 700BC and from the old testament, the old covenant with God. And here he was speaking to Cyrus, the only gentile ruler to be anointed by God on the rebuilding of Jerusalem for Israel.

You are taking the verse out of context as to what was going on

Also, I would suggest taking the time to understand the difference between the 2(old and new) as for most of my life I did not grasp the difference and it wasn't until recently a little angle came along and showed me the light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W54/XM-388
That is from Isaiah 45:5, written around 700BC and from the old testament, the old covenant with God. And here he was speaking to Cyrus, the only gentile ruler to be anointed by God on the rebuilding of Jerusalem for Israel.

You are taking the verse out of context as to what was going on

Also, I would suggest taking the time to understand the difference between the 2(old and new) as for most of my life I did not grasp the difference and it wasn't until recently a little angle came along and showed me the light.
The difference between the old and new is easy. Old Testament is God’s extreme feeling about sin. The New Testament is God’s remedy for sin. No I am not taking the verse out of context. Old or New Testament aside, what God says about Himself absolutely matters.
 
The difference between the old and new is easy. Old Testament is God’s extreme feeling about sin. The New Testament is God’s remedy for sin. No I am not taking the verse out of context. Old or New Testament aside, what God says about Himself absolutely matters.
My suggestion remains the same.

Edit, I don't believe you grasp the deeper meanings between the two. Check out Romans 8.
 
My suggestion remains the same.

Edit, I don't believe you grasp the deeper meanings between the two. Check out Romans 8.
And my answer remains the same. There is no deeper meaning. That is the difference between the two testaments. Catholics are too hung up on the Old Testament laws and ordinances. They are trying to be save through all of these rituals yet Paul said if you offend in one you offend in all.
 
And my answer remains the same. There is no deeper meaning. That is the difference between the two testaments. Catholics are too hung up on the Old Testament laws and ordinances. They are trying to be save through all of these rituals yet Paul said if you offend in one you offend in all.
And this answer should show you that I am definitely familiar with Romans 8. There is therefore now no condemnation to them who are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death…
 
To whom did Jesus give the keys to the kingdom? Peter. What did Peter say about salvation? Then Peter said unto them, Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. I’ve yet to have any trinitarian of any flavor anywhere be able to explain this verse
 
No I am not recanting. Romans 8 was written to believers, not unbelievers.
Its not about who it was written to. It's about what it means.

It was written for all to hear. In my opinon, As a message of hope for those who choose to hear it and a warning for those who do not.

So you say you grasp Romans 8 yet still deny the trinity? Are you saying you are a non believer?
 
None of those show me how there can be three co-equal, co-eternal, co-existent gods that make up one deity? How can one God have all power but share it equally with two others? How can Jesus pre exist (as trinitarians believe) and still be born of a virgin? “I am God, and beside me there is no other.” Sounds pretty clear to me. He said that no man can see him and live, and He had to fulfill the law and the covenant so made a human body that he put on like a robe and walked this earth for 33 years and died to redeem us from our transgressions. We could get into the discussion on if Jesus could have sinned. I bet that would get entertaining.
Well your first sentence shows you do not understand the trinity. The doctrine of the trinity does not say there are three gods. There is one divine nature God, in three co-equal, co-eternal persons: God the Father, God the Son (Jesus Christ), and God the Holy Spirit. These three persons share one essence or nature, but are distinct in their roles and relationships.

These roles and relationships are what we see directly in the scriptures.



The Father Initiates and directs the plan of salvation, sends the Son and the Holy Spirit, is the source of all things

The Son (Jesus) becomes incarnate and redeems humanity through his life, death, and resurrection, is the Word of God and the means by which creation was made, and Intercedes for humanity.


The Holy Spirit empowers believers to live according to God's will, convicts, teaches, and leads, and sanctifies and dwells within believers.

Additionally in the scriptures we see each person of the trinity is individually given the honors, attributes, names, deeds and seat of God.



Now we as limited humans do not fully understand how this works. We in no way could fully understand how the inner workings of the eternal relationship of the God head. It is rather arrogant to assume that you could fully understand God in that way. There is no logical contradiction that exists and we see the tenants of the Trinity in scripture, so we embrace the mystery.

Now to Jesus. He is the eternal Son who is fully divine. During the incarnation he took on human nature. He is now both fully God and fully man in one person without confusion or separation. This is called Chalcedonian Christology or the hydrostatic union. Without his fully divine nature he could not have lived a sinless life. Without his fully human nature he could not have been our representative, the new Adam, that atoned for all man kind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtrmn
Its not about who it was written to. It's about what it means.

It was written for all to hear. In my opinon, As a message of hope for those who choose to hear it and a warning for those who do not.

So you say you grasp Romans 8 yet still deny the trinity? Are you saying you are a non believer?
No. I’m saying since Romans 8 seems to be the whole of the New Testament to you, please explain to me where in Romans 8 that Paul tells us the three headed god exists.
 
Well your first sentence shows you do not understand the trinity. The doctrine of the trinity does not say there are three gods. There is one divine nature God, in three co-equal, co-eternal persons: God the Father, God the Son (Jesus Christ), and God the Holy Spirit. These three persons share one essence or nature, but are distinct in their roles and relationships.

These roles and relationships are what we see directly in the scriptures.



The Father Initiates and directs the plan of salvation, sends the Son and the Holy Spirit, is the source of all things

The Son (Jesus) becomes incarnate and redeems humanity through his life, death, and resurrection, is the Word of God and the means by which creation was made, and Intercedes for humanity.


The Holy Spirit empowers believers to live according to God's will, convicts, teaches, and leads, and sanctifies and dwells within believers.

Additionally in the scriptures we see each person of the trinity is individually given the honors, attributes, names, deeds and seat of God.



Now we as limited humans do not fully understand how this works. We in no way could fully understand how the inner workings of the eternal relationship of the God head. It is rather arrogant to assume that you could fully understand God in that way. There is no logical contradiction that exists and we see the tenants of the Trinity in scripture, so we embrace the mystery.

Now to Jesus. He is the eternal Son who is fully divine. During the incarnation he took on human nature. He is now both fully God and fully man in one person without confusion or separation. This is called Chalcedonian Christology or the hydrostatic union. Without his fully divine nature he could not have lived a sinless life. Without his fully human nature he could not have been our representative, the new Adam, that atoned for all man kind.
But how can eternal be born? Jesus had a beginning at his physical birth. So was Jesus divine flesh that could do no sin? Was Jesus present at creation? If so then how did he die? Can a God die?
 
Correct, I do not understand the trinity, because as the Bible clearly states, I am made in the image of God and I am not triune. I am one person. I am a father, I’m a husband, I’m a friend, I’m a truck driver etc. but that doesn’t make me multiples. It means I am one person that is doing different jobs. God does the EXACT same thing. He is the Father. He fathered a son miraculously then he put that flesh on and walked among us. He was hungry, tired, happy, sad, and even tempted. Just like you and I for us to see that we can do it too. I don’t understand the trinity, but I am not confused as to who God is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makinchips208
But how can eternal be born? Jesus had a beginning at his physical birth. So was Jesus divine flesh that could do no sin? Was Jesus present at creation? If so then how did he die? Can a God die?
No Jesus was not present at creation, the eternal Son was. Jesus is the union of the Nature of the Eternal Son with human nature. Jesus’ death on the cross was physical death, not spiritual death, so no God did not die
 
Correct, I do not understand the trinity, because as the Bible clearly states, I am made in the image of God and I am not triune. I am one person. I am a father, I’m a husband, I’m a friend, I’m a truck driver etc. but that doesn’t make me multiples. It means I am one person that is doing different jobs. God does the EXACT same thing. He is the Father. He fathered a son miraculously then he put that flesh on and walked among us. He was hungry, tired, happy, sad, and even tempted. Just like you and I for us to see that we can do it too. I don’t understand the trinity, but I am not confused as to who God is.
No what you are describing is called modalism and is not what is going on in the Bible. Further you seem to misunderstand what it means to be made in God’s image. That does not mean you somehow have God’s nature, it means you are his representative here as being an image ment in the ancient world.

Also yes you are one person and not multiple, but this is because you are not of a divine nature. You do not have the same attributes or the divine nature
 
But to be a “son” one must be born…
No son does not mean that. To be a son is a relational thing. How can you call someone who is adopted your son? It’s not that you have birth to him or that he is of your flesh, it is his relationship to you. In the same way, how can we be called sons of God? God does not birth us, rather it is our relationship to him

Also there are spiritual beings that are not born in the OT who are called sons of God. Son-ship does not equal birth

So the eternal Son is not the son because the Father birthed him, the eternal Son is a son because of his relationship to the Father. This language is by Jesus himself to put into human family terms the closeness of the eternal relationship in the Godhead
 
Last edited:
Then what about Genesis 1 where God says “let us make man in our image, after our likeness.”?
This is a verse trinitarians like to use, but according to what you’re saying we are not actually in God’s likeness. And yes, we do have His nature in salvation. That is precisely what salvation is. It is us being changed from our “natural” way, or nature, to His nature.
 
Then what about Genesis 1 where God says “let us make man in our image, after our likeness.”?
Yes we are created in his image after the likeness of what we would call the divine council (I.e. co ruling/ administrating )But this language in the Hebrew and in the context of the ancient world does not mean what we as moderns have assigned to it. It does not mean we somehow have a piece of God’s divine nature. It means we are his representatives or his vice regents here on earth. The same language is used in ancient times to refer to a kings representative
 
Last edited:
This is a verse trinitarians like to use, but according to what you’re saying we are not actually in God’s likeness. And yes, we do have His nature in salvation. That is precisely what salvation is. It is us being changed from our “natural” way, or nature, to His nature.
I am a Trinitarian and I never would reference this verse to support the trinity. That is because I understand what it meant it in it originally context. Here God is not talking to himself, he is talking to the heavenly hosts/divine council.

Additionally you seem to misunderstand what is meant by nature. Nature is not a reference to our natural way and does not reference behavior. What nature means in this discussion is what we are made of, our substance. We are made of a physical nature. God is made up of an immaterial nature. There are other spiritual beings that have an immaterial nature, but they do not have God’s immaterial nature. So to respond to what you said, no salvation is not us being turned into God’s nature/substance.
 
But we are taking on His nature. Repentance is death of our will, or nature. Baptism is the burial of that dead body. And being born again of the spirit through the infilling of the Holy Ghost is our new life.
2 Peter 1:4 speaks of believers becoming "partakers of the divine nature" through God's promises. We are partakers of the divine nature, not in the sense of becoming literally God, but in becoming more like God in character and way of life. But we are partaking in that Divine nature/substance of God, we are not made God and we do not loose our human nature/substance. God’s divine nature helps us to become our true human nature. Think about it, Adam and Eve were in communion with God in the garden with human nature. Human nature /substance isn’t inherently bad, sin just corrupts

But bringing that back to the trinity discussion, Nature is referring to God’s substance, what he is made up of. You could never hope to describe the infinite Divine nature/substance using the finite human nature/substance as a reference point
 
But we are taking on His nature. Repentance is death of our will, or nature. Baptism is the burial of that dead body. And being born again of the spirit through the infilling of the Holy Ghost is our new life.
Also you missed one key point of baptism. Yes it represents our death when we go into the waters, but it also represents our resurrection when we come out of the waters. It is symbolism tied to Jesus death and resurrection. Just as Jesus’ body died and was resurrected, so too will ours. Also just as Jesus did not loose his human nature when he was resurrected, neither do we loose ours (again nature in the sense of what we are made up of/substance and not behavior)

Additionally being born of the spirt is symbolically tied to the incarnation of Jesus. Just as the divine nature was tied to the human nature in the incarnation, so to is our human nature connected to the divine (though in a lesser and different way than with Jesus) when we are born of the Spirit. Both baptism and being born of the spirt are directly analogous to Jesus’ death, burial and resurrection and His incarnation (an incarnation that is not possible without a trinitarian understanding)
 
Last edited:
This leads to your quotation from Joseph Smith the founder of the Mormon church. He was completely removed from any kind of biblical scholarship. Additionally he carried a post Enlightenment hermeneutic that is not compatible with the ancient text of the scriptures (ever wonder why off the wall denominations like 7th day adventists and oneness Pentecostals, as well as heretical Christian adjacent faiths like Mormonism and Jehova witness pop up around that same time?) Third he had ambition as motivation for his interpretations. Finally, he made claims that very much contradict the historical realities of scripture. For example his whole idea that scripture was corrupted over time was absolutely blown out of the water with the Dead Sea Scrolls. That isn’t even mentioning his created theology that has no grounding in scripture or Judaism; things like god did good works on a different planet as a man and became a god here, or if we do good works we will become gods of our own planets, or things like wisdom are outside of god and pre-existed him. Smith’s interpretations were rooted in polytheism and Gnosticism, and not the Bible or historical faith. With all that being said, Joseph Smith’s interpretations are not as equally valid as the historic faith and the interpretations of the Apostolic fathers (the guys right after the apostles), because Joseph smith was far far away from the biblical context and the author’s intent

You kind of sound like a Methodist or a Baptist, In my experience they are usually the ones most on the hateful side to folks that don't follow their specific dogmas. I don't blame them too much, they are usually propagandized by their pastors and leaders...

It's sad because our Church is probably the most understanding and accepting of other denominations of any Church you'll find.

(Plus, you are kind of repeating a bunch of kid level, anti-stuff they teach their children on "hate the xxx" instruction days. Most of which is pretty laughable since it's so off). We always know when that time of the year rolls around because their kids will be going around school berating our kids about how they are going to hell and such, it would be laughable if it wasn't so sad that others teach their kids hate.

I'll just say that in my opinion, the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are the most Christian Christians of all Christians.
We work hard to help all who are living, who have ever lived or will ever live to come unto Jesus Christ if they have true desire.

Hate all you want, it won't stop our work of bringing the gospel of Jesus Christ to the whole world.
Whenever you are ready to put aside the misinformation and hate propaganda you have been taught and are interested in knowing about the Truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, then you'll find some kind and caring members of our Church ready to meet with you and teach you and discuss and explain things with you.

Who knows, perhaps in time you'll find the Truth of the Restored Gospel and we'll be happy to welcome you into our congregation to join with us in the work of Gathering Israel and serving Jesus Christ.
 
But how can eternal be born? Jesus had a beginning at his physical birth. So was Jesus divine flesh that could do no sin? Was Jesus present at creation?

This is the chicken and egg problem that has led to so many learned scholars coming up with convoluted explanations of the relationship between God the Father, and God the Son (Jesus Christ) to try to cram it into a human understanding.

Humans at this stage can't understand something without a beginning.
God the Father has no beginning, He always existed.
God the Son also always was, as Jesus Himself said.

It's a matter of taking it by faith that God the Father always was, and also God the Son always was and always existed just as God always existed, without beginning and without ending. One day on a higher plane of consciousness we'll be able to comprehend and understand that.


If so then how did he die? Can a God die?

John 10:17-18:

"17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.

18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.
"

Jesus Christ always existed and always was God
He had power to lay down his physical body in physical mortal death, and he had power to take his physical body back up in resurrection.
This was in accordance with the Will and commandment of God The Father (as listed in that verse, unless you want to get into that whole "I am my own father" stuff).

Humans without understanding of where we came from and where we are going, get confused by that, as they tend to think of birth and death as beginning and ending points of existence.

Jesus Christ existed long before the Creation of the Earth and long before he chose to be born into a human body. He had full power over the life, death and resurrection of his mortal body because He is God and always was.

Jesus Christ just like His Father, are without beginning and without ending.
 
You kind of sound like a Methodist or a Baptist, In my experience they are usually the ones most on the hateful side to folks that don't follow their specific dogmas. I don't blame them too much, they are usually propagandized by their pastors and leaders...

It's sad because our Church is probably the most understanding and accepting of other denominations of any Church you'll find.

(Plus, you are kind of repeating a bunch of kid level, anti-stuff they teach their children on "hate the xxx" instruction days. Most of which is pretty laughable since it's so off). We always know when that time of the year rolls around because their kids will be going around school berating our kids about how they are going to hell and such, it would be laughable if it wasn't so sad that others teach their kids hate.

I'll just say that in my opinion, the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are the most Christian Christians of all Christians.
We work hard to help all who are living, who have ever lived or will ever live to come unto Jesus Christ if they have true desire.

Hate all you want, it won't stop our work of bringing the gospel of Jesus Christ to the whole world.
Whenever you are ready to put aside the misinformation and hate propaganda you have been taught and are interested in knowing about the Truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, then you'll find some kind and caring members of our Church ready to meet with you and teach you and discuss and explain things with you.

Who knows, perhaps in time you'll find the Truth of the Restored Gospel and we'll be happy to welcome you into our congregation to join with us in the work of Gathering Israel and serving Jesus Christ.
Actually no I am not a Baptist or Methodist, and the critique of Mormonism is not unique to just baptists or Methodists. Rather all biblically based denominations and the church throughout time are critical of Mormonism and Mormon adjacent beliefs. You are being dismissive of the fact that every Christian denomination thinks the Mormons are heretical and not Christians. This is not just a phenomenon of mean brainwashing Methodist or Baptist pastors, no Christian denomination actually thinks Mormons are Christian.



Additionally just saying the things I brought up are childish is strawmaning. All of what I said is in fact in Mormon doctrine and texts and you do not address any of them or attempt to refute them. Let’s go through some of it.



First let’s look at the issues the Mormon church has historically. Smith claims scripture was corrupted over time and after Jesus. This is easily historically falsified with the Dead Sea Scrolls that date to the 300s BC. The great Isaiah scroll for example matches almost word for word what we have today in the Bible. However, it does not match the translations that Smith made. Additionally, Smith’s corruption claims fall flat when we look at the textual criticism and copies of the NT text. There are only minor copying errors between the nearly 25,000 manuscripts we have and does not effect any essential doctrines and beliefs. Smiths “translations” however have significant differences with the historical manuscripts in both words and doctrines. Smith stands against the entire body of textual evidence we have that spans over 2000 years.



Next the Book of Mormon, which was supposedly given by an angle but we can no longer see the original because it went back to heaven, is highly anachronistic. An anachronism is something or someone placed outside of its correct historical time period. This happened because Smith made up things from the past and brought his current context into the narrative. Anachronisms is one of the main ways we can easily falsify a text. If the Book of Mormon was from heaven and actually told true history, it would not contain such anachronisms. Here is a quick summary of some.



Technology and Materials:

  • Steel, Iron, and Metal Swords:
    The Book of Mormon mentions steel, iron, and metal swords, which were not available in pre-Columbian America.
  • Chariots:
    The text also refers to chariots, which would have been technologically advanced for the time period.
  • Compass (Liahona):
    The Liahona, a compass-like object, is described in the Book of Mormon, though compasses were not known in pre-Columbian America.
  • Wheels and Chariots:
    The text mentions the use of wheels and chariots, which were not known in pre-Columbian America.
  • Coins:
    References to coins are also considered anachronistic, as pre-Columbian societies did not use coins.
  • Cement:
    The Book of Mormon mentions the use of cement, which would have been a technology not available at the time.
Animals and Plants:

  • Horses, Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Swine:
    These animals, which were not native to pre-Columbian America, are mentioned in the Book of Mormon.
  • Elephants:
    The Book of Mormon mentions elephants, which were also not native to pre-Columbian America.
  • Wheat:
    The text mentions wheat, which was not a crop that was grown in pre-Columbian America.
Biblical and Theological References:

  • Jerusalem as the Birthplace of Christ:
    The Book of Mormon mentions Jerusalem as the birthplace of Christ, which is a reference to a city in the Old World and would not have been relevant to the Nephites.

  • References to Malachi
    The text includes references to the prophet Malachi, who lived centuries after the Book of Mormon period.

  • The Holy Spirit before Christ
    The Book of Mormon mentions the Holy Spirit before the birth of Christ, which is a concept that would not have been known to the Nephites.
  • New Testament text
    The text incorporates elements of New Testament scripture, which would not have been available to the Nephites.
Other Anachronisms:

  • Specific Vocabulary:
    The text uses vocabulary that is more characteristic of 17th-century England than the pre-Columbian era.
  • Biblical Quotations:
    The text contains direct biblical quotations that would not have been known to the Nephites.


Next we can talk about Smiths prophecies. Here are a few of them, which according to Deuteronomy 18:20-22 means he is a false prophet.



  • In 1835 Joseph Smith prophesied the Lord’s return within 56 years (History of the Church, Vol. 2, pg. 182). By 1891 this was proven to be a false prophecy.
  • In 1843 Joseph Smith prophesied that the United States government would be overthrown and wasted within a few years if they refused to redress the wrongs committed against the Mormons in Missouri (History of the Church, Vol. 5, pg. 394). The United States government has never formally redressed any wrongs committed against the Mormons in Missouri and the government still stands nearly 170 years later.
  • In 1832 Joseph Smith prophesied that the present generation of Mormons would not pass away before the temple of the New Jerusalem would be built in Zion, Missouri (Doctrine & Covenants Section 84). The Mormons were forced to flee Missouri and no temple was constructed there in Joseph Smith’s lifetime or within the generation that witnessed this prophecy.
  • In 1832 Joseph Smith prophesied that the United States civil war would eventually engulf all nations (Doctrine & Covenants Section 87). This prophecy did not come close to being fulfilled.
  • Joseph Smith made many other false prophecies in his lifetime. By the standards of God’s word, he must be labeled a false prophet (Deuteronomy 18:20-22).


All this doesn’t even get into the wackiness and issues with his family and group of people. Ultimately he has all the markers of a cult leader.





Next to theology. To be a Christian one must believe in who Jesus claimed to be and believe what he taught. Mormon theology is veiled in Christian language and uses vailed Christian theology, but when you go deeper completely contradicts biblical Christianity, things Jesus taught, and who Jesus claimed to be. Here are some of the biggest heresies



Deity of Christ. According to official Mormon doctrine, Jesus is the first spirit child conceived and begotten by Heavenly Father and one of his many wives. Jesus progressed through obedience to the status of a god (prior to his incarnation). Heavenly Father subsequently had many more spirit children. Mormons believe even Satan (Lucifer) is a spirit brother of Jesus. As explained in the Mormon publication Ensign, “Jesus was Lucifer’s older brother.”



Original Fall. Mormons maintain that prior to the fall, Adam and Eve were not mortal, which they redefine to mean “able to bear children.” Thus, Mormons redefine the fall as “necessary and glorious,” for by it the “pre-existent” progeny of Father God and Mother God could receive bodies and begin an eternal progression by which they too may become what God is. In the words of the fifth Mormon president, Lorenzo Snow, “As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.”



Canon of Scripture. According to the Book of Mormon, the Bible is incomplete, having lost substantial portions throughout its transmission over time. Not only so, but Joseph Smith had the unmitigated gall to delete arbitrarily the Song of Solomon, alter scores of biblical passages, and write himself into the Scriptures in his “corrected translation” of Genesis! Moreover, Mormons subscribe to “ongoing revelation” by modern-day church prophets, whose words become as binding as their Mormon quad (the Holy Bible, Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price). Within the maze of Mormonism, one can find living prophets contradicting dead prophets and LDS teachings once official (or quasi-official) that are no longer considered credible.



Trinity. Mormons worship three “separate and distinct” gods. Said Smith, “I have always declared God to be a distinct personage, Jesus Christ a separate and distinct personage from God the Father, and that the Holy Ghost was a distinct personage and a Spirit: and these three constitute three distinct personages and three Gods.” Not only so, but Smith taught that God Himself was once merely human: “God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens.”



Resurrection. Mormons believe Christ’s resurrection did nothing but guarantee that everyone, regardless of their beliefs, will be raised from the dead with the opportunity to pursue their own course of salvation. Murderers and unrepentant whoremongers attain the telestial heaven; lukewarm Mormons, religious people, and those who accept the Mormon gospel in the spirit world enter the terrestrial heaven; and temple Mormons go to the celestial heaven. Only those who are sealed in secret temple rituals, however, make it to the third level of the celestial kingdom and become gods of their own planets.



Incarnation. In Mormon lore Jesus was first conceived a spirit child by Heavenly Father and Heavenly Mother, and then “begotten in flesh” when Heavenly Father had sex with the Virgin Mary. Said Mormon president and prophet Ezra Taft Benson, “Jesus Christ is the Son of God in the most literal sense. The body in which He performed His mission in the flesh was sired by that same Holy Being we worship as God, our Eternal Father.” Mormon apostle Bruce McConkie left no ambiguity: “Christ was begotten by an Immortal Father in the same way that mortal men are begotten by mortal fathers.”



New Creation. Mormons teach that one’s lot in the afterlife (post- mortality) will reflect one’s obedience to the laws of Mormonism in this life. As such the Mormon road to godhood (new creation) is arduous. A Mormon must not only have faith but exhibit perfect obedience to the law, including faithful participation in LDS temple rituals (marriage, baptisms for the dead, etc.). In the words of Joseph Fielding Smith, “To enter the celestial kingdom and obtain exaltation it is necessary that the whole law be kept.



Eschatology. Mormons believe that when America’s government in 1890. However, by virtue of secret temple ceremonies, Mormon crumbles amid social turmoil, economic instability, and religious strife, the Mormon Church will step in to restore economic security. This will ultimately lead to the return of Jesus Christ, who will set up a one-thousand-year global theocracy based in Jackson County, Missouri. Mormons will subsequently reign with Christ, and everyone will be confronted with Mormonism as the one true religion. Smith alleged God had told him the return of Christ would take place before he was eighty-five years of age.



I could continue to go on, but today I was not planning on writing a dissertation on the heresy of the Mormon church today. But to sum it up, you cannot just push away the criticism of the Mormon church as somehow childish or just the result of angry Baptists. There are very real and deep issues with Mormon theology and history, which run completely counter to true Christianity.
 
Whenever you are ready to put aside the misinformation and hate propaganda you have been taught and are interested in knowing about the Truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, then you'll find some kind and caring members of our Church ready to meet with you and teach you and discuss and explain things with you.

Who knows, perhaps in time you'll find the Truth of the Restored Gospel and we'll be happy to welcome you into our congregation to join with us in the work of Gathering Israel and serving Jesus Christ.
Don’t worry I don’t need a Mormon elder to “explain” anything to me (the actual brainwashing). I have a Masters of Divinity and Doctoral work. I have studied these topics, read much literature (to include Mormon literature), and written pages and pages about it. There is no such thing as the “restored” gospel, just the gospel which Jesus gave and was taught through the apostles. I don’t need the writings of a 19th false prophet to know the truth
 
Then what about Genesis 1 where God says “let us make man in our image, after our likeness.”?

(Sigh)
This is entirely self evident.
GOD created man in his image.
Body
Soul
Spirit
He created us in three parts.
Yes i understand that man has interpreted soul and spirit to be the same thing...despite the reality that YHWH is referred to as Father, Son, and Spirit.
Yeshua/Jesus has always been from Genesis 1 to Revelation 22. He is the Alpha and Omega.
He himself said He is the I Am. He said no man hath seen the Father. He said I and my Father are one. He said you have seen me, you have seen the Father. Despite their knowledge that Moses could not look upon the Father, they demanded that Jesus, show them the Father. This is what we are doing in this thread...right now. The only way any man can look upon the Father, is to look on Yeshua who IS the Body, the incarnation, of which scripture exhaustively bears witness to.
YHWH appeared to Abraham, sat down, broke bread, and ate with him. That was NOT the Father.

We don't understand these things because we don't know we don't even have a spirit, or if we do, it is dead. We are spiritually DEAD! The ONLY way we understand this, is to be spiritually "reborn" through the indwelling of the Holy Ghost, and "except the Spirit draw a man, he cannot be saved". I am not talking about baptism and speaking in tongues, not even going there. That is a whole nother discussion of "Jesus plus" heresy.
The Word is also exhaustive on the subject of our SPIRITUAL DEATH.
How could a three part being, understand they are three parts, if they were born 1/3rd part dead? You can't.
The ONLY way you even have a spirit, is by rebirth through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
Don't fret though....there is enough of him to go around, though few give Him full access.

The Word is sufficient for all these questions and answers. No new revelation is required NOR IS/WAS ONE GIVEN....TO ANYONE BEYOND John the revelator.

Understanding a 3 part single being is simple math.
Oh and one other thing. Just because you are a three part being doesn't mean one day you will be a god, or be like God, or attain divinity. Nor will you ever be an angel or anything other than you were created. Glorified, yes.
When we see Him, we will be like Him. That doesn't mean you will be a little god.
 
But you take the writings and false doctrine ideas of Constantine (who was not a Christian) to tell you who Jesus is?
This statement leads me to believe that you do not understand church history or historical theology. Nowhere do I or what you might call nicene fathers embrace the writings or ideas of Constantine. Constantine was the emperor and called the bishops from across the Christian faith to come together and codify into writing at Nicea what had long been held and taught. The trinity didn’t somehow come out of his writings and again that statement shows you have a misunderstanding of history
 
Last edited:
This statement leads me to believe that you do not understand church history or historical theology. Nowhere do I or what you might call nicene fathers embrace the writings or ideas of Constantine. Constantine was the emperor and called the bishops from across the Christian faith to come together and codify what had long been held and taught into writing at Nicea. The trinity didn’t somehow come out of his writings and again that statement shows you have a misunderstanding of history
The trinity 100% was founded at nicea
 
This statement leads me to believe that you do not understand church history or historical theology. Nowhere do I or what you might call nicene fathers embrace the writings or ideas of Constantine. Constantine was the emperor and called the bishops from across the Christian faith to come together and codify at Nicea what had long been held and taught into writing . The trinity didn’t somehow come out of his writings and again that statement shows you have a misunderstanding of history
I think this guy is Trolling you.
 
(Sigh)
This is entirely self evident.
GOD created man in his image.
Body
Soul
Spirit
He created us in three parts.
Yes i understand that man has interpreted soul and spirit to be the same thing...despite the reality that YHWH is referred to as Father, Son, and Spirit.
Yeshua/Jesus has always been from Genesis 1 to Revelation 22. He is the Alpha and Omega.
He himself said He is the I Am. He said no man hath seen the Father. He said I and my Father are one. He said you have seen me, you have seen the Father. Despite their knowledge that Moses could not look upon the Father, they demanded that Jesus, show them the Father. This is what we are doing in this thread...right now. The only way any man can look upon the Father, is to look on Yeshua who IS the Body, the incarnation, of which scripture exhaustively bears witness to.
YHWH appeared to Abraham, sat down, broke bread, and ate with him. That was NOT the Father.

We don't understand these things because we don't know we don't even have a spirit, or if we do, it is dead. We are spiritually DEAD! The ONLY way we understand this, is to be spiritually "reborn" through the indwelling of the Holy Ghost, and "except the Spirit draw a man, he cannot be saved". I am not talking about baptism and speaking in tongues, not even going there. That is a whole nother discussion of "Jesus plus" heresy.
The Word is also exhaustive on the subject of our SPIRITUAL DEATH.
How could a three part being, understand they are three parts, if they were born 1/3rd part dead? You can't.
The ONLY way you even have a spirit, is by rebirth through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
Don't fret though....there is enough of him to go around, though few give Him full access.

The Word is sufficient for all these questions and answers. No new revelation is required NOR IS/WAS ONE GIVEN....TO ANYONE BEYOND John the revelator.

Understanding a 3 part single being is simple math.
Oh and one other thing. Just because you are a three part being doesn't mean one day you will be a god, or be like God, or attain divinity. Nor will you ever be an angel or anything other than you were created. Glorified, yes.
When we see Him, we will be like Him. That doesn't mean you will be a little god.
lol. Well, there is parts of what you said I agree with and other parts I don’t, but don’t fret, as I already have the Holy Ghost in me and I was baptized in Jesus’ name as was commanded by Peter and the apostles. That is why I am called apostolic. Oh, yes and the Pharisees and sadducees called the apostles heretics clear back then
 
The trinity 100% was founded at nicea
No sorry it did not the Bible and church history shows that it did not. The WORD trinity was codified at Nicea, but the teaching and aspects of the trinity is in the NT and in early Christian teachings. Again you do not understand history.

I said this before but I will say it again.
First, you are appealing to the fallacy of specificity. Yes the word Trinity does not appear in the Bible, but you know what other word doesn’t? Monotheism. Does that mean that the Christian faith isn’t monotheistic? Absolutely not. What it means is we sometimes give categorical names to theological truths we see in scripture.

Next Nicaea was not called to establish the doctrine of the Trinity, as it has its roots in ancient Judaism and the New Testament. Even the patristic fathers spoke of the Trinity. The counsel was called to address heresies that had popped up, mainly Arianism but also this heresy of modalism. The Nicene Creed was produced to officially codify into writing the long held belief of the Trinity. Ask yourself why would non-trinitarian heresies exist prior to Nicaea if the Trinity was invented at Nicaea? The fact is it goes all the way back to Jesus and had its roots in the Jewish understanding of the “Two powers in heaven” doctrine (go read up on that). Example Gen 19:24 “YHWH God rains down fire from YHWH out of heaven”
 
A little message that applies to the Book of Mormon and others
Rev 22 : 18-19
18 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. 19 And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
The trinity 100% was founded at nicea
Also here are teachings about the nature of God from pre-nicean and apostolic fathers (the guys who learned directly from the apostles) God was understood as one divine nature in 3 distinct persons well before Nicea. Their teachings are not canon, but show Trinitarian though in the early church

Polycarp Disciple of John

"O Lord God almighty . . . I bless you and glorify you through the eternal and heavenly high priest Jesus Christ, your beloved Son, through whom be glory to you, with Him and the Holy Spirit, both now and forever" (n. 14, ed. Funk; PG 5.1040).
Justin Martyr

"For, in the name of God, the Father and Lord of the universe, and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit, they then receive the washing with water" (First Apol., LXI).
Ignatius of Antioch

"In Christ Jesus our Lord, by whom and with whom be glory and power to the Father with the Holy Spirit for ever" (n. 7; PG 5.988).
"We have also as a Physician the Lord our God Jesus the Christ the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin. For ‘the Word was made flesh.' Being incorporeal, He was in the body; being impassible, He was in a passable body; being immortal, He was in a mortal body; being life, He became subject to corruption, that He might free our souls from death and corruption, and heal them, and might restore them to health, when they were diseased with ungodliness and wicked lusts." (Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., The ante-Nicene Fathers, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975 rpt., Vol. 1, p. 52, Ephesians 7.)
Irenaeus

"The Church, though dispersed throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: . . . one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father ‘to gather all things in one,' and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Savior, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, ‘every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess; to him, and that He should execute just judgment towards all . . . '" (Against Heresies X.l)
Tertullian
"We define that there are two, the Father and the Son, and three with the Holy Spirit, and this number is made by the pattern of salvation . . . [which] brings about unity in trinity, interrelating the three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are three, not in dignity, but in degree, not in substance but in form, not in power but in kind. They are of one substance and power, because there is one God from whom these degrees, forms and kinds devolve in the name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit." (Adv. Prax. 23; PL 2.156-7).
Origin

"If anyone would say that the Word of God or the Wisdom of God had a beginning, let him beware lest he direct his impiety rather against the unbegotten Father, since he denies that he was always Father, and that he has always begotten the Word, and that he always had wisdom in all previous times or ages or whatever can be imagined in priority . . . There can be no more ancient title of almighty God than that of Father, and it is through the Son that he is Father" (De Princ. 1.2.; PG 11.132).
"For if [the Holy Spirit were not eternally as He is, and had received knowledge at some time and then became the Holy Spirit] this were the case, the Holy Spirit would never be reckoned in the unity of the Trinity, i.e., along with the unchangeable Father and His Son, unless He had always been the Holy Spirit." (Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975 rpt., Vol. 4, p. 253, de Principiis, 1.111.4)
"Moreover, nothing in the Trinity can be called greater or less, since the fountain of divinity alone contains all things by His word and reason, and by the Spirit of His mouth sanctifies all things which are worthy of sanctification . . . " (Roberts and Donaldson, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 4, p. 255, de Principii., I. iii. 7).
Clement of Alexandria:

God is indemonstrable and therefore is not an object of knowledge. But the Son is Wisdom and Knowledge and Truth and all that is akin to these, and he admits of demonstration and explanation. All the powers of the Spirit gathered together into unity complete the notion of the Son, but he is not completely expressed by our conception of each of his powers. He is not merely one, as unity, or many, as having parts, but One as All. Hence he is All. For he is the circle of all powers, which in him are rounded and united. Stromateis 4.25 (156.1).
Believe, O mortal, in him who is man and God: believe in him who suffered and is worshiped as the living God. Servants, believe in him who was dead; all people, believe in him who is the only God of all humankind. Believe and receive salvation for your reward. Exhortation to the Greeks 10.(106).
Eusebius of Caesarea:

In the same manner, or rather in a manner that far surpasses all likeness or comparison, the perfect Word of the supreme God, as the only-begotten Son of the Father—not consisting in the power of utterance, or comprehended in syllables and parts of speech or conveyed by a voice that vibrates on the air, but being himself the living and effectual Word of the most High and subsisting personally as the power and wisdom of God—proceeds from his Father’s deity and kingdom. Thus, being the perfect offspring of a perfect Father and the common preserver of all things, he diffuses himself with living power throughout creation and pours from his own fullness abundant supplies of reason, wisdom, light and every other blessing, not only on objects nearest to himself but also on those most remote, whether in earth or sea or any other sphere of being. To all these, he appoints with perfect equity their limits, places, laws and inheritance, allotting to each their suited portion according to his sovereign will. Oration on Constantine 12.4-5.
This only-begotten Word of God reigns, from ages that had no beginning to infinite and endless ages, the partner of his Father’s kingdom. Oration on Constantine 2.1.
 
lol. Well, there is parts of what you said I agree with and other parts I don’t, but don’t fret, as I already have the Holy Ghost in me and I was baptized in Jesus’ name as was commanded by Peter and the apostles. That is why I am called apostolic. Oh, yes and the Pharisees and sadducees called the apostles heretics clear back then
Apostolic Holiness....or a flavor of the same.
Yeah...good for you, and good luck with that.
 
Also here are teachings about the nature of God from pre-nicean and apostolic fathers (the guys who learned directly from the apostles) God was understood as one divine nature in 3 distinct persons well before Nicea. Their teachings are not canon, but show Trinitarian though in the early church

Polycarp Disciple of John


Justin Martyr


Ignatius of Antioch


Irenaeus




Origin


Clement of Alexandria:



Eusebius of Caesarea:
Hm…I see no scripture there. Just the writings of men. If we aren’t using the Bible, then what is the basis of discussion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makinchips208
Hm…I see no scripture there. Just the writings of men. If we aren’t using the Bible, then what is the basis of discussion?
As I said, they are not canon. What I am illustrating is Trinitarian thought existed in the early church. That is presented to refute your claim that the trinity was created at Nicea. History shows it was not. Additionally there are many scriptures that show Trinitarianism. That was not the point of my post. It was to show you were uninformed about church history. We can go into Trinitarian scriptures if you want
 
As I said, they are not canon. What I am illustrating is Trinitarian thought existed in the early church. That is presented to refute your claim that the trinity was created at Nicea. History shows it was not. Additionally there are many scriptures that show Trinitarianism. That was not the point of my post. It was to show you were uninformed about church history. We can go into Trinitarian scriptures if you want
ok, let me amend that to say that the trinity idea was not established at nicea, but it was absolutely enshrined and adopted wholesale there. As for trinity scriptures, there are none. I’ve read the WHOLE Bible through from one leather cover to the other and never seen the word “trinity” “triune” or “co-equal” etc anywhere. I can point out scores of scriptures that refer to God as ONE.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
ok, let me amend that to say that the trinity idea was not established at nicea, but it was absolutely enshrined and adopted wholesale there. As for trinity scriptures, there are none. I’ve read the WHOLE Bible through from one leather cover to the other and never seen the word “trinity” “triune” or “co-equal” etc anywhere. I can point out scores of scriptures that refer to God as ONE.
Neither is monotheism. I have never read that in the Bible. Does that mean that Christianity isn’t monotheistic?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LuckyLuke80
Ok my last comment-read deuteronomy 6:4.
Right it says YHWH is one. It doesn’t say monotheism, however we would say our faith is monotheistic. We do this all the time, we assign categorical terms to theological truths we see in scripture. The term Trinity is the same thing.

That is the summation of your argument. Because it doesn’t say trinity or use a few specific terms, you deny the trinity. All the while ignoring the relational distinctions we see in scripture of the father son and spirit. You are committing the logical fallacy of specificity
 
Right it says YHWH is one. It doesn’t say monotheism, however we would say our faith is monotheistic. We do this all the time, we assign categorical terms to theological truths we see in scripture. The term Trinity is the same thing.

That is the summation of your argument. Because it doesn’t say trinity or use a few specific terms, you deny the trinity. All the while ignoring the relational distinctions we see in scripture of the father son and spirit. You are committing the logical fallacy of specificity

Isaiah 40-55 says we are monotheistic.
 
Last edited:
ok, let me amend that to say that the trinity idea was not established at nicea, but it was absolutely enshrined and adopted wholesale there. As for trinity scriptures, there are none. I’ve read the WHOLE Bible through from one leather cover to the other and never seen the word “trinity” “triune” or “co-equal” etc anywhere. I can point out scores of scriptures that refer to God as ONE.
I’ll say this again

These roles and relationships are what we see directly in the scriptures and shows the relational differences we see between the Father, Son, and Spirit. Since the scriptures affirm all 3 are God, yet all three have different functions and different relationships to each other, we say God is triune



The Father Initiates and directs the plan of salvation, sends the Son and the Holy Spirit, is the source of all things

The Son (Jesus) becomes incarnate and redeems humanity through his life, death, and resurrection, is the Word of God and the means by which creation was made, and Intercedes for humanity.


The Holy Spirit empowers believers to live according to God's will, convicts, teaches, and leads, and sanctifies and dwells within believers.

Additionally in the scriptures we see each person of the trinity is individually given the honors, attributes, names, deeds and seat of God.