• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

Accuracy International Picture Thread

How does one get an FDE butt-pad? Asking for a friend

IMG_2526.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: taliv
Stupid non-AI thread question but... It needs input from the 'pinky out' group of the 'Hide.

Would you go for a NIB Zeiss LRP S5 for $2,600??? It is the annual holiday for optics sales. G3 Razor again through EV for $2,400, or ATACR for $2,700ish... Or the Zeiss from EO.

I have zero knowledge of the Zeiss.

I am kind of wanting more magnification than 25x though, because it is probably going to find a home on a target rifle and not a tactical one.
 
Stupid non-AI thread question but... It needs input from the 'pinky out' group of the 'Hide.

Would you go for a NIB Zeiss LRP S5 for $2,600??? It is the annual holiday for optics sales. G3 Razor again through EV for $2,400, or ATACR for $2,700ish... Or the Zeiss from EO.

I have zero knowledge of the Zeiss.

I am kind of wanting more magnification than 25x though, because it is probably going to find a home on a target rifle and not a tactical one.
IMG_3448.jpeg



Get a 735 ATACR 432 nx8 or 636 razor
 
Stupid non-AI thread question but... It needs input from the 'pinky out' group of the 'Hide.

Would you go for a NIB Zeiss LRP S5 for $2,600??? It is the annual holiday for optics sales. G3 Razor again through EV for $2,400, or ATACR for $2,700ish... Or the Zeiss from EO.

I have zero knowledge of the Zeiss.

I am kind of wanting more magnification than 25x though, because it is probably going to find a home on a target rifle and not a tactical one.
Razor

Or go get a LEO/MIL MK5 7-35 and buy more ammo

Maffs for Muhreens
 
Another good day with a new Bartlein/WinTac barrel. This time with the 24". I want to see how the barrel settles after a deep clean and more rounds through her; only 70 rounds got fired today before shooter fatigue set in, and I didn't want to waste the ammo. The cold bore shot was impressive as hell though. I also still need to test out Hornady A-Max 168gr and Federal Berger 185gr. So I'll keep sharing...
1000016597.jpg


And a glamor shot. The 24" AT308 gets the Leupold MK5HD 7-35x56mm with Tremor3 reticle. My 20" has the 5-25x56mm. Both are the revised models with dual erector springs, and both got the nipple twister test without a single hiccup.

1000016598.jpg


I'll work on getting 300 yard groupings next. And for those interested, I'll do some scope tracking as well. Thank you again @Frank Green for the excellent barrels!
 
Last edited:
Another good day with a new Bartlein/WinTac barrel. This time with the 24". I want to see how the barrel settles after a deep clean and more rounds through her; only 70 rounds got fired today before shooter fatigue set in, and I didn't want to waste the ammo. The cold bore shot was impressive as hell though. I also still need to test out Hornady A-Max 168gr and Federal Berger 185gr. So I'll keep sharing...
View attachment 8691374

And a glamor shot. The 24" AT308 gets the Leupold MK5HD 7-35x56mm with T3X reticle. My 20" has the 5-25x56mm. Both are the revised models with dual erector springs, and both got the nipple twister test without a single hiccup.

View attachment 8691375

I'll work on getting 300 yard groupings next. And for those interested, I'll do some scope tracking as well. Thank you again @Frank Green for the excellent barrels!
Pretty impressive shootin’ there pardner must be the labradar effect lol j/k
 
View attachment 8691387

Just curious - is this some kind of allergy / bug off spray?
No. That's the emulsified molybdenum disulfide compound I use to condition my brand new barrels. This is the only lubricant product I use when cleaning my barrels, and I only wet-patch, so that it can continuously bake into the barrel and molecularly bond to the steel as it reacts to both high heat and the trace elements of sulfur from firing rounds. It is a highly viscous nanoparticle version of molybdenum, not a grease.

I always do 1/2 the M24 SWS break-in process as per FM 3.22-10 (2017), for the purpose of slowly building up heat to bake the molybdenum disulfide into the barrel.


When I can't use Jeany's, I will use Shooter's Choice FP10 as it is also molybdenum based. The bolt gets a Lucas gun lube grease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uniform64 and Edsel
Another good day with a new Bartlein/WinTac barrel. This time with the 24". I want to see how the barrel settles after a deep clean and more rounds through her; only 70 rounds got fired today before shooter fatigue set in, and I didn't want to waste the ammo. The cold bore shot was impressive as hell though. I also still need to test out Hornady A-Max 168gr and Federal Berger 185gr. So I'll keep sharing...
View attachment 8691374

And a glamor shot. The 24" AT308 gets the Leupold MK5HD 7-35x56mm with T3X reticle. My 20" has the 5-25x56mm. Both are the revised models with dual erector springs, and both got the nipple twister test without a single hiccup.

View attachment 8691375

I'll work on getting 300 yard groupings next. And for those interested, I'll do some scope tracking as well. Thank you again @Frank Green for the excellent barrels!

That is a good shootin' barrel man!
 
Hello gentlemen, first-time poster here. I'm interested in picking up an AXSR in 300 PRC but have a few questions I was hoping one of you might be able to answer. My plan would be to have a 280 Ackley barrel spun up, and I am trying to figure out what bolt I would need to use. Would the .308 bolt work, or will I run into issues given the LA cartridge? Would that concern be assuaged by proper barrel chambering? Would I need to modify specific magazines? Would it instead require a different bolt face on the 300 PRC bolt? Any input is appreciated.
 
My ole’ sitting rifle. It’s an AT-MC-AO-GTAC edition, the year they put small firing pins in 2014 models (long rifles inc.) It’s been awhile since I posted a pic in the thread. I only log in to SH to see this thread so I thought I’d pay my tax.

I was watching the 15 wild turkeys in my backyard with it.

Anyone else rocking a modified AT in here?

#ATXisgay
IMG_9994.jpeg
 
My ole’ sitting rifle. It’s an AT-MC-AO-GTAC edition, the year they put small firing pins in 2014 models (long rifles inc.) It’s been awhile since I posted a pic in the thread. I only log in to SH to see this thread so I thought I’d pay my tax.

I was watching the 15 wild turkeys in my backyard with it.

Anyone else rocking a modified AT in here?

#ATXisgayView attachment 8692014
There’s a few of us around. I think I’ve posted this same pic like 5 times but whatever.

314A2089-6C72-488F-8B98-9CC4FACF4D42.jpeg
 
Just use my hands 🤷🏼‍♂️
Hmmmm yeah I get it. That’s not enough torque for me, I guess. I agree with @bohem ’s advice


10” Cresent wrench Is what I use, and I snap it tight as I hold it between the legs. But if hand tight works for you, I’m not arguing. Just didn’t consider people forgoing machined-in flats, which kinda boxes you into hand tight or futzing with a strap wrench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bohem
I think people are confused a bit because you used the iPhone portrait setting, which did some freaky shit.

View attachment 8692050
View attachment 8692051

@Jrgasser used the iPhone portrait setting too. Notice the freaky. Just pointed out two spots of many in that pic.

View attachment 8692057

Gives more context to the hooplah behind even basic digital imagery being called into question as evidence in court.

The processing algorithms are just so way above our levels of comprehension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carbonbased
Hmmmm yeah I get it. That’s not enough torque for me, I guess. I agree with @bohem ’s advice


10” Cresent wrench Is what I use, and I snap it tight as I hold it between the legs. But if hand tight works for you, I’m not arguing. Just didn’t consider people forgoing machined-in flats, which kinda boxes you into hand tight or futzing with a strap wrench.
I think you're confusing two different AI barrel systems, maybe? You referenced a pic of an AXSR and asked about barrel flats and strap wrenches, etc. "Hand-tight" is what is SPECIFIED in the manual for the AXMC, AXSR, and other platforms that use the Quick-Loc barrel system. Hand-tight sets the headspace properly, and the lock mechanism, properly torqued to approx. 50 in.lbs provides the force to keep it locked firmly in place with no need for additional torque on the barrel. The flats are handy in case one ever got stuck and wouldn't come off by hand, but I have changed quite a few around and never run into that. It seems to me that torquing one of these barrels significantly more than hand-tight could potentially damage the receiver threads since the threads are split longitudinally (to make the clamp) and not designed to take that much torque with the clamp loosened for barrel changing. The i.d. of the receiver threads is relaxed (larger) with the clamp loosened, and the threads don't go 360 deg around the tenon of the barrel - there is a gap in the threads at the bottom.

You would be correct, however, on the earlier, non Quick-Loc designs, which definitely need substantially more torque than hand-tight because they don't have the clamping mechanism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uniform64
I think you're confusing two different AI barrel systems, maybe? You referenced a pic of an AXSR and asked about barrel flats and strap wrenches, etc. "Hand-tight" is what is SPECIFIED in the manual for the AXMC, AXSR, and other platforms that use the Quick-Loc barrel system. Hand-tight sets the headspace properly, and the lock mechanism, properly torqued to approx. 50 in.lbs provides the force to keep it locked firmly in place with no need for additional torque on the barrel. The flats are handy in case one ever got stuck and wouldn't come off by hand, but I have changed quite a few around and never run into that. It seems to me that torquing one of these barrels significantly more than hand-tight could potentially damage the receiver threads since the threads are split longitudinally (to make the clamp) and not designed to take that much torque with the clamp loosened for barrel changing.

You would be correct, however, on the earlier, non Quick-Loc designs, which definitely need substantially more torque than hand-tight because they don't have the clamping mechanism.
Hmmmm I was talking about all barrel changes across shouldered barrel brands, including my ‘23 AT with the quick change system.

Maybe I’m effing up my AI? But with a 10” Cresent wrench, rifle standing on end between my legs, I can’t be putting any more than 50 ft/lbs into it (if that).

I thought that’s what people were doing around here…I could dig for links but 🤷‍♂️

There’s that semi-famous vid of that forum member changing his AI barrel in the field with a big ass wrench, but not sure if that was a quick change AI.

So you might be right? I guess I gotta go digging now.
 
Last edited:
Hmmmm I was talking about all barrel changes across shouldered barrel brands, including my ‘23 AT with the quick change system.

Maybe I’m effing up my AI? But with a 10” Cresent wrench, rifle standing on end between my legs, I can’t be putting any more than 50 ft/lbs into it (if that).

I thought that’s what people were doing around here…I could dig for links but shrug 🤷‍♂️

There’s that semi-famous vid of that forum member changing his AI barrel in the field with a big ass wrench, but not sure if that was a quick change AI.

So you might be right? I guess I gotta go digging now.
That was on a 97’ AW.

Most of us go more than hand tight as well. But when I do I’m basically hand tightening it with the wrench on the flats. Just more than you can get it by hand without the wrench

I and several others do 55 in lbs on the quickloc screw as well. Sometimes the bonding would get in where the clamp is which causes issues tightening as well
 
Hmmmm I was talking about all barrel changes across shouldered barrel brands, including my ‘23 AT with the quick change system.

Maybe I’m effing up my AI? But with a 10” Cresent wrench, rifle standing on end between my legs, I can’t be putting any more than 50 ft/lbs into it (if that).

I thought that’s what people were doing around here…I could dig for links but shrug 🤷‍♂️

There’s that semi-famous vid of that forum member changing his AI barrel in the field with a big ass wrench, but not sure if that was a quick change AI.
Mmm, I don’t think so with the Quick-Locs. The video you mention is Jake Bynum from Rifles Only, with a non Quick- Loc action. They are supposed to be torqued to a specific (higher) value, and the point of his video was that “whatever”that specific value is, isn’t that important. Just good and TIGHT (whack the big wrench with a big hammer, no torque wrench for him). But those rifles are supposed to have their barrels on tight because they lack the retention mechanism of the Quick-Loc. I don’t have an AT, just AXMC and AXSR. What does your manual say?