• Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    Drop your caption in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!

    Join the contest

Rifle Scopes Burris XTR3!!!

some sweet pics.

the “comp” knobs
BD10DC53-0C01-4174-940A-C9717317C2F7.jpeg



will try some completely scientific “phone” pics. best i could get through sxope. way way way better clearer in reel life.

and map prices. $50 more for the scr2 looks like
and playin with ckye-pod lol

regards
DT
 

Attachments

  • FC45C055-EB8C-440A-8A90-8CD30963F7A6.jpeg
    FC45C055-EB8C-440A-8A90-8CD30963F7A6.jpeg
    318.3 KB · Views: 228
  • 4EAEF9EE-73BC-4A81-AF5D-2082C0FE35ED.jpeg
    4EAEF9EE-73BC-4A81-AF5D-2082C0FE35ED.jpeg
    338.2 KB · Views: 218
Last edited:
Dubious of quality IMHO I've owned a few Burris optics in my time and the 1980's seemed better than the 2008 purchase's I've owned !
Apples to Oranges, the best was a 1x4LERP and the mediocre is a 3x9TAC that is fuzzy at best at the edges at any magnification.
I hope the quality has advanced since then!
 
I really want these scopes to excel. I understand the nervousness that some have, the XTR II 4-20 had a rough start but rounded out nicely, it's hard to think of being an early adopter with any scope these days, but hopefully with what Burris has learned from the XTR II and the T5Xi (also put together in Greeley) they know now how the consumer will scrutinize and test and compare and... well, any scope mfr should realize that the consumer is much more educated these days than even 5 years ago, most know how to tall target test or even setup their own "humbler" to ensure tracking, many have access to ranges out to a 1000 and farther, and even more will setup resolution targets and high contrast/low contrast charts to see how well the scope performs optically - all that to say it's a different market and if you put out a dud the word spreads very quickly on forums and social media. That's a lot of pressure on any manufacturer and Burris has said they realize this and have indicated the XTR III will be solid from the get go, but I will be patient and wait to hear from others first and give it some time before I dive in (I've been burned before by being an early adopter). I appreciate your enthusiasm birddog but it is so hard to tell how good a scope is from inside a venue like SHOT, did they have any out on Field Day on Monday? I'm going to try to get up to see them in person at the Burris plant once the dust settles from SHOT.
 
Yes, it was noticeably brighter even indoors. And the sight picture was one of the best I looked through at the show. It really looks good. Nice edge to edge picture.

I agree it will most likely be a stretch to compare the glass to the Razor. I'll find out pretty quick on that, it's one of the scopes I have lined up for a comparison. I spent some time looking through the Cronos, the DMR Pro, the ERS II, the similarly priced Nightforce, etc. So far it's stacking up very well.

So better than the XTR2 then, right?
 
Yes.

The XTR II has been improving, and it looks pretty good these days. But there is a noticeable improvement in the XTR3. It's a different sight picture completely. And I never try to hide the fact that I'm that biased Burris guy, so you can take whatever I say at any value you wish to give it, but it had as good or better a sight picture as any scope I looked at over the last three days. It really looked good.

Now that I've finally seen it and handled it for myself, I'm even more excited about it. Burris has really developed the right product with the right features at the right price. It all boils down to execution by the production crew in Greeley at this point.

A clean product roll out and glass to match its price point.
I own an XTR2 and it is my second favorite scope (right behind a NF7-35): bullet proof, crisp turrets, good weight, clean reticle and consistent parallax adjustment.

Better optical quality is simply a bonus! Might end up with a few of these pretty quickly.
 
For that price and the minimal amount of elevation, unless this scope has severely better glass, it sounds like the Cronus BTR is still a better and less expensive choice.

Will be interested in side by side comparison
 
It will definitely be interesting. I like the reticle selection on both of these optics.

Comparing the 5.5-30x56 Burris to the 4.5-29x56 Cronus is very close. The 30x XTR3 is an inch longer, but 4ozs lighter. FOV for the XTR3 is 4.2' at 100 yards on 30x, 3.8' at 100 yards at 29x for the Cronus. Both have great features. We all know LOW makes a good optic. Price is pretty much a wash, they are going to be within a hundred or two of each other.

I suspect it will boil down to glass quality for a lot of folks. Speaking only for myself I dont care for the turret feel on the Cronus, and that whole home repair grease fix was a real turn off. But I think Athlon has done a good job of taking care of their issues, which all scope lines have, and making good changes moving forward. I havent see too many Cronus' out and about, so I dont have much experience with them.

Hopefully I'll be able to hunt one down for a side by side. I know of a couple shops here in Boise who carry them, and I know the shop owners. Maybe they will let me steal one for a minute :)

The Burris has wayyyy better turrets than the Cronus btr. Like not even a comparison. Def agree
 
  • Like
Reactions: jafo96
way better then the razor

Cant possibly know until I have them side by side at the range to compare in the same conditions. The mechanics on the xtr3 are very good. I will say the eye box gets really tight above 25x but that’s kind of to be expected. If you’re on the fence I’d wait until someone that is unbiased gets both and posts a side by side comparison.
 
The Burris has wayyyy better turrets than the Cronus btr. Like not even a comparison. Def agree

My old XTR II had better turrets than my current Cronus BTR. But I still kept the Cronus over the XTR II.

Curious to see how it stacks up, I'd be up to swap out my BTR for one... but looking like it might be more of a lateral move. Was hoping they could shave a little more weight on them.
 
My old XTR II had better turrets than my current Cronus BTR. But I still kept the Cronus over the XTR II.

Curious to see how it stacks up, I'd be up to swap out my BTR for one... but looking like it might be more of a lateral move. Was hoping they could shave a little more weight on them.

Turrets alone are worth the swap. The XTR3 has "alpha" level turrets. The Athlon has the cheap Filipino/Chinese feeling turrets.
 
I've always been a fan of XTR II turrets. It seems most people have always agreed that they had a great feel to them and obviously functioned excellently.

But I agree with Generalzip. I think the turrets on the XTR3 feel even better. They are still very firm and solid, but it felt like the clicks were even more noticeable. Perhaps just slightly more tactile.

I'll leave that up to you guys though to decide if you like them better.
Turrets are very subjective, my favorite so far are the Leupold Mark 5HD turrets, just wish they had better reticles and didn’t charge so much for illumination. Hello Burris XTR III with better reticle and illumination. Like you birddog, I thought the XTR II had really nice turret feel for the price, no complaints but if the XTR III are even more tactile, get the SCR2 with illumination out already.
 
Last edited:
I also like the turrets on the MK5. But I've definitely heard people comment on how much they like a turret on brand X, and in the back of my head I'm thinking that brand feels like crap. It's definitely subjective.

I havent heard anything on the timeline for the SCR2 rollout, or illumination. My money is on seeing the reticle before we see an illuminated version. The reticle at least exists in prototypes. So they just have to go live with it. Sky was way too busy to catch at the show to see if he had an idea on when we would see those. Maybe we can get some info from him once the dust settles.
my understanding is june we will see them. turrent click on some scopes just feal cheap like some one designed them in there back yard. others are smooth defined crisp clean clicks not like your tring to open a child proof asprin cap. or like you hit the over tighten on your gas cap on you car. The Burris xtr3 clicks feel very professional well designed better then the good xtr2 and by far better then the majority of clicks on the higher end scopes. this scope is very well done. They are no longer dads 3X9 hunting scope company. even if some wont except that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glassaholic
Two models in XTR 3 will be 3.3-18×50 and 5.5-28×56 and sorry he didn't know if the glass is coming from Japan or no but everything else he said was going to be machined in house at the plant,max elevation on the 18x will be 35mil and max on 28x will be 26mil
the burris xtr3 is 100% designed and built in the USA
 
The only question I have is burris talks about there over sized elevation speed turrent option that can be ordered and there cap covered option but have not been able to find or see any photos of what they look like
 
This is BigJimFish's picture from his SHOT show thread
View attachment 7014699

Does the race dial come exactly as pictured?
I'd assumed it was just bigger and you have to apply your own white tape (or what ever you want), but that'll be quite cool if they come like that already.

I hope these XTR3s come out soon, now shot show has been and gone I can confirm that this is the only scope I'm interested in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_TROS
Turrets are very subjective, my favorite so far are the Leupold Mark 5HD turrets, just wish they had better reticles and didn’t charge so much for illumination. Hello Burris XTR III with better reticle and illumination. Like you birddog, I thought the XTR II had really nice turret feel for the price, no complaints but if the XTR III are even more tactile, get the SCR2 with illumination out already.

I don't think the XTR2 and XTR3 turrets are *anything* like each other. XTR3 has much less resistance on the turn, but much more tactile clicks. Up there with the top end Vortex, Kahles, etc. I also like the 10 mil per rev because the spacing is nicer than 15, but they are so crisp that they could've gone 15 mil per rev and not had any issues. The turret knurling is also very aggressive, possibly the most of any turrets I've felt. It should work well in really cold weather if you are using heavy gloves.
 
Does the race dial come exactly as pictured?
I'd assumed it was just bigger and you have to apply your own white tape (or what ever you want), but that'll be quite cool if they come like that already.

I hope these XTR3s come out soon, now shot show has been and gone I can confirm that this is the only scope I'm interested in.
It's my understanding this is how they come, a poster on another thread said the size is the same width as scotch tape so people can wrap it with tape and write their own solutions based on the targets for any given comp.
 
BigJimFish called them meatgrinders, but I train my hands just so I can turn my turret knobs...

I saw that too from Big Jim and it made me chuckle, to be honest, living in a state that gets cold in winter time I've come to appreciate turrets that have a bit more grip when wearing gloves. I suppose if I turned the turrets with the backs of my hands they might grind a bit, but my index finger and thumb are pretty tough and don't envision any grinding even when turning quick.

Your martial arts video made me think of my buddy Victor Marx, I've taken a few of his self defense courses and really like him as a person, he has a ministry now where he takes some ex-military guys into Iraq and some other dark places and rescues kids, really amazing what he and his team do.
 
The more I look at this scope, the more I want to fondle one and maybe buy one for my NRL22 rifle. The worst part about shopping and they way media hypes things up these days is starting to want something that isn't available yet. I hate that!
 
The more I look at this scope, the more I want to fondle one and maybe buy one for my NRL22 rifle. The worst part about shopping and they way media hypes things up these days is starting to want something that isn't available yet. I hate that!

Agreed. You will have to wait in line as there are a lot of people who are excited about this scope.

Even if it's not publicly available, I hope a decent review will be out soon, hopefully side by side with competing scopes like Gen 2 Razor and Mark 5HD.
 
close but a few changes. i didnt like the numbers going back and forth so for a smoother look just having the even numbers on both sides. then some crosses added above the horizontal for hold under stages.

i really really like the small center cross. very small and very precise. ?


Regards
DT
 
  • Like
Reactions: SageRatSafaris
I’m really excited about these. I’ve owned 3 of the 5-25 XTRII’s and they are pretty nice for the cost. I became a scope snob as well... but I may give one of the new models a go. I never really liked how hard it was to rotate the turrets. Call me a wuss but it seemed they were very stiff. Anxious to get one of these in my hands!
 
close but a few changes. i didnt like the numbers going back and forth so for a smoother look just having the even numbers on both sides. then some crosses added above the horizontal for hold under stages.

i really really like the small center cross. very small and very precise. ?


Regards
DT

Link to a better reticle diagram?
 
I apologize if this has been asked already, and the question might be premature, but has anyone had the chance to compare the XTRIII and Mark 5HD side-by-side?

Thanks in advance.
 
Had a little time with the 5.5-30 XTR3. Super impressed so far. the retc is the best ive ever used. maybe im biased haha. Its super thin but when doing fast stages holding over under from 200-500, my only misses were when I forgot to hold under (2x out of 100) so I was happy there. I shot past dusk and was still able to see targets no prob. I wish I brought my Minox or March to compare. I think the Minox is getting sold. This scope obviously doenst have the glass Minox has, but all the other features, including FOV, is quickly making me forget this XTR3 is the inferior scope...

I did compare the 3.3-18 XTR3 (before I had to return it) to my Luppy mk6. The Burris was noticeably better in FOV and brightness which I thought was odd as I liked the Mk6 line (just not their prices) I think the Mk6 is a better scope than the Mk5 when Ive looked through them together.

Again these are not production scopes so I will wait to do an official side by side but I am really excited. Burris has came out in a huge way with this scope.

I get some better through the scope pics when my phone scope arrives...


DT
 

Attachments

  • XTR3 1.jpg
    XTR3 1.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 238
  • XTR3 2.jpg
    XTR3 2.jpg
    635.4 KB · Views: 250
Last edited:
^^^ I think you meant the 5.5-30x56, but probably easy to confuse with others because the FOV is better than some 5x scopes. I bet if you looked through your March vs. the Burris you would think you're looking through a straw with the March, love that little scope for what it is but it does have a pretty narrow FOV throughout the range.