Um, no sir. They really can’t. Any restriction is an infringement, period. Technically, all of the stuff on the books already is an infringement and we should be fighting that. Tax would be an infringement. Insurance would be an infringement. Shall not be infringed is pretty simple. I don’t know why people can’t understand that.
As far as having supplies to outlast a bill lol. Maybe if you should 10 rds a year lol. Any serious shooter can blow through a couple hundred precision rifle rounds per session. If you go 1x a week that’s 800 rds a month. That’s 9600 rds a year, just for one caliber and rifle. That’s also nearly $14,000 worth of ammo just for that one caliber! Many here might be sitting on 10’s or thousands of rounds but it’s not going to last indefinitely by any means for any serious shooter. Not to mention, the people writing these bills consider anyone that has even that kind of stockpile a terrorist. Better hope they never come to your house. I doubt many people here, if any, are sitting on millions of dollars of ammo. So yes, restricting sales of ammo in the future is 100% infringing on the 2A. And like I said, this is a Precision round. If we are talking 5.56 or something. I can easily shoot 500 rds a session 1x a week if I so chose to. Heck I know guys that shoot 1000 rds a week. Sure they could scale back their shooting and get by for awhile but at some point they are going to run out. Same goes for reloading supplies.
