Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’d a pretty simple measurement for anyone to do with anyone has both action. I can measure an impact tomorrow.That's cool to hear that they have essentially the same timing.
Agree the other the difference is subtle for sure. The drawings I saw had a 10 thou difference in counterbore, 140 vs 150 so you'd have a tiny bit more case support on a LP barrel. That's not much at all and since the headspace is the same then essentially it would seem to be a judgement call about how much bolt nose to barrel clearance there is. I wonder if the bolt nose rim to bolt face protrusion is the same on a LP vs Impact bolt.
How do you disassemble the bolt on the LPA?
Dang, that's lame. I thought it was like my old Axiom lolUse a rem 700 bolt tool.
Dang, that's lame. I thought it was like my old Axiom lol
Using a tool is pretty lame when others have twist tops but all is wellIt’s not lame at all. Very simple and effective.
Using a tool is pretty lame when others have twist tops but all is well
Are you worried about running the bolt or taking it apart once every 3 months?Using a tool is pretty lame when others have twist tops but all is well
Are you worried about running the bolt or taking it apart once every 3 months?
Does anyone know the main difference between the fuzion vs razor action? Are they both as smooth and have prefit barrel compatibility.
Are you worried about running the bolt or taking it apart once every 3 months?
Does anyone know the main difference between the fuzion vs razor action? Are they both as smooth and have prefit barrel compatibility.
I am like you. I prefer rifles that can be field stripped without any specialized tools, or the rifle has a tool contained on itself.
Let me know what you want for your Fuzion if you ever get tired of using tools on it.No, but my previous action had a twist removal and thought my Fuzion also had this feature but apparently not.
Have you gotten the chance to do this yet? I have two impacts, kind of want to try a LPA fusion, this would be awesome if they work between each other.It seems there is a lot of speculation by a lot of people and nothing for certain. You’d think, for as many people that apparently have both Impacts and LPs in this thread, someone would have put this to bed by now...
Going to torque an Impact barrel on the LP and test using gauges. It’ll either headspace or it won’t. If it headspaces properly using gauges I will test fire it to see if there are any ill effects on brass due to the difference in counterbore.
At least then we’ll have some evidence either for or against using Impact barrels on LP actions.
Have you gotten the chance to do this yet? I have two impacts, kind of want to try a LPA fusion, this would be awesome if they work between each other.
@Shanerbanner10 have you gotten a chance by chance to confirm? Thank you both in advance!
@Sheldon N hey I was just wondering per your explanation, since the counterbores are different per tenon diagrams by 10 thou but if they headspace the same it would be 10 thou less in the counterbore regardless even if you had a prefit spun up for your specific action and didn't interchange barrels? LPA Fuzion diagram for their tenon is 140 thus it appears 10 thou shorter than impact (I don't see any tenon diagrams published for impact per web search).
Appreciate your guys input on this!
Thank you!
Ah.... got it thx for that info! So basically it will work but brass will need to be sized differently by .002This is what I was told when I had a new barrel put on my Fuzion. These are the direct quotes from him. He had a barrel for an impact laying around and was curious so checked. This wasn't a pre-fit but a barrel he had fitted to one of his Impact actions. He fitted a new different barrel for me.
"It's almost identical, barrel tenon is spot on, headspace of your action is .002 more than an impact, so an impact prefit would work, it would be ideal to adjust the sizing die so you aren't bumping the shoulder too much"
"I had a brain fart, your receiver is a match for an impact prefit, with the barrel hand tight it is go +.004, so once it's torqued down it should be go+.001+.002"
@Sheldon N hey I was just wondering per your explanation, since the counterbores are different per tenon diagrams by 10 thou but if they headspace the same it would be 10 thou less in the counterbore regardless even if you had a prefit spun up for your specific action and didn't interchange barrels? LPA Fuzion diagram for their tenon is 140 thus it appears 10 thou shorter than impact (I don't see any tenon diagrams published for impact per web search).
So I played around a bit side-by-side with the Impact and Lone Peak fusion. Headspace is identical, measured with go and no-go gauges on common barrels. Engraving timing is off, when the lettering on the Lone Peak barrel is correct for 9:00/3:00 that will put it at around 6 and 12:00 on the Impact.
Measuring the bolts themselves (both 308 BF) the Impact bolt is indeed 10 thou longer from bolt face to bolt nose. I think they measured 0.150 and 0.140 or therabouts but I didn't write it down.
There was no contact between the bolt nose of the Impact action and the barrel tenon when putting on a Lone Peak barrel, but I don't know how much gap remained. I'd be curious to know what the total clearance between bolt nose and barrel tenon is when chambered properly.
Given that bolt noses are 0.010 different and barrel tenon's are 0.010 different, there is actually a 20 thou net difference in clearance when switching barrels between actions (shorter bolt nose + shorter tenon or longer bolt nose + longer tenon). I'm not a gunsmith so don't have any knowledge of whether the bolt nose plays any part in supporting the case head, or if clearances are too close if you run a Lone Peak barrel on an Impact action.
So I played around a bit side-by-side with the Impact and Lone Peak fusion. Headspace is identical, measured with go and no-go gauges on common barrels. Engraving timing is off, when the lettering on the Lone Peak barrel is correct for 9:00/3:00 that will put it at around 6 and 12:00 on the Impact.
Measuring the bolts themselves (both 308 BF) the Impact bolt is indeed 10 thou longer from bolt face to bolt nose. I think they measured 0.150 and 0.140 or therabouts but I didn't write it down.
There was no contact between the bolt nose of the Impact action and the barrel tenon when putting on a Lone Peak barrel, but I don't know how much gap remained. I'd be curious to know what the total clearance between bolt nose and barrel tenon is when chambered properly.
Given that bolt noses are 0.010 different and barrel tenon's are 0.010 different, there is actually a 20 thou net difference in clearance when switching barrels between actions (shorter bolt nose + shorter tenon or longer bolt nose + longer tenon). I'm not a gunsmith so don't have any knowledge of whether the bolt nose plays any part in supporting the case head, or if clearances are too close if you run a Lone Peak barrel on an Impact action.