Hi,
Is that sorta like when Command Master Chief holds a meeting and says nobody is allowed to purchase a car from abc dealer because the 500 complaints from that dealer pulling the switcharoo, lolol
BUT my rights!!!, lolol
Sincerely,
Theis
- Thread starter madppcs
- Start date
Hi,
Is that sorta like when Command Master Chief holds a meeting and says nobody is allowed to purchase a car from abc dealer because the 500 complaints from that dealer pulling the switcharoo, lolol
BUT my rights!!!, lolol
Sincerely,
Theis
That’s a good example but like choosing to wear the mask to get into Costco if your a MEMBER. We made a choice to enlist knowing we were held to a different and higher standard. Holding to that higher standard because of a oath commitment didn’t strip us of our rights. They were still there to fall back on. Also When your a soldier your not protected because you were “following orders” so soldiers have to be (should be) strong in their convictions.
Sounds to me like this @THEIS person (never assume gender!!!
) should own a firearms company and do it’s marketing.
having talked with him, he is Registering negative on the douche scale vs the guy from Q who is off the charts.
and Inchman Breezy, find somewhere else to be a windbag.
) should own a firearms company and do it’s marketing.having talked with him, he is Registering negative on the douche scale vs the guy from Q who is off the charts.
and Inchman Breezy, find somewhere else to be a windbag.
Yes that would be perfect for a individual like @THIES. That individual wouldent have as much computer time then though.Sounds to me like this @THEIS person (never assume gender!!!
having talked with him, he is Registering negative on the douche scale vs the guy from Q who is off the charts.
and Inchman Breezy, find somewhere else to be a windbag.
That is more state law/regulation and private entitie's policies. If Costco said you had to dance the Hokey Pokey when you enter a store as part of their membership, then you put your left foot in...
As for the mask in public, that has been beaten to death here too many times this summer.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights are pretty clear. Nowhere does it mention any agency, or working hours.
Hi,
It also doesn't mention speed limits and schools being gun free zones but yet they exist.
It also doesn't mention seatbelts being a requirement in order to participate in using a motor vehicle but yet it is required.
It also doesn't mention that companies cannot dump lead and other harmful chemicals into the rivers but yet they are not allowed.
It also doesn't mention oil companies can lease blocks in the GOM in order to pursue oil/gas exploration yet they are leased and used every single day.
It also doesn't mention the Federal Government can control what commerce comes in and goes out of the USA but yet they not only control it, they receive monetary taxes/fees from it.
ALL those above are controlled and conducted by Agencies. Which ones are ok for Agencies to oversee and which are not ok?
How many people do not have active registrations and insurance on your vehicles? Why do we fall for complying with that?
We all want the 2A to be extremely cut and dry, black and white but we have allowed the Gov to grey everything else too. If we are going to truly use the Constitution and BOR as they were/are intended to be used it must be done as the whole document, not piece milled to fit ANY particular agenda.
Sincerely,
Theis
Last edited:
Imterestingly, there seems to be some overall confusion in regards to 2A. IMO, as ACB put it, 2A is a individual right that transcends civil duty or civil rights.
Meaning, its inherent to the individual. Thus, to take the same approach or apply analogies of civic responsibility/duties are apples to oranges.
But I am admittedly biased in my own line of reasoning.
For individual rights 1A and 2A are, again IMO absolute and for a very specific reason which is rather evident in this thread. Because there is never any true "middle ground" or "common sense" that can be applied without infringing on what is inherent.
Meaning, its inherent to the individual. Thus, to take the same approach or apply analogies of civic responsibility/duties are apples to oranges.
But I am admittedly biased in my own line of reasoning.
For individual rights 1A and 2A are, again IMO absolute and for a very specific reason which is rather evident in this thread. Because there is never any true "middle ground" or "common sense" that can be applied without infringing on what is inherent.
Because people like us are totally complacent. All we ever do is come on forums like this and complain, then go back to watching (other people) on TV burn down cities and overtake police precinct's and actually get laws written, changed to there liking.
Until we stop bitching and moaning and being compliant with every unconstitutional law and use the tactics that are being used against us, then we are all on borrowed time.
Also, US Constitution does not mention the US Marines Corp or the U.S. Air Force. I guess in the alt-right world these need to go.
Or the USDA or health inspectors? I guess madppcs loves eating rancid meat and moldy bread. Slap on some hot sauce and no one would notice when it is going down...
Or maybe he wants Congress to take over these agencies? Let Diane Feinstein write the ATF opinions on what is a legal gun or not. Or have the Pelosi and Schumer decide who gets broadcast licenses for TV and Radio. What could go wrong there???
As for labor hours, I guess he is OK with sending kids into coal mines, working 60-70 hours a week, and no safety oversight. OK, OSHA is another agency that has gotten out of control. But then again, most people would rather not see their kids working in a mine that can collapse any minute either.
Or the USDA or health inspectors? I guess madppcs loves eating rancid meat and moldy bread. Slap on some hot sauce and no one would notice when it is going down...
Or maybe he wants Congress to take over these agencies? Let Diane Feinstein write the ATF opinions on what is a legal gun or not. Or have the Pelosi and Schumer decide who gets broadcast licenses for TV and Radio. What could go wrong there???
As for labor hours, I guess he is OK with sending kids into coal mines, working 60-70 hours a week, and no safety oversight. OK, OSHA is another agency that has gotten out of control. But then again, most people would rather not see their kids working in a mine that can collapse any minute either.
Also fun fact, the US Constitution and the BORs originally only applied to Federal Government. States were free to do what ever and could ignore the US Constitution when writing their laws. So, if your state passes an Assault Weapons Ban, you better comply since in your alr-right world the 2A does not apply to state laws. Or if your governor tells you to wear a mask in public, you better comply since it is your state's law. The US Constitution only became applicable to state laws after passing the 14th Amendment. Which was never in the BORs. Sooo....
What are you rambling on about? Nobody is talking about the Marine Corp or 75% of all the other long winded responses coming out of you. My point was that the 2nd Amendment is pretty well written and self explanatory. Every agency and law in existence against it is unconstitutional.
Your trying to argue sending kids into coal mines...
The difference, gents, is that the founding fathers felt so strongly about the Second Amendment to our US Constitution, is that they left a clear and distinguished message to all that followed to understand. The right to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!! The Constitution is otherwise a framework, upon which our legal system and the law of our country is built upon. But, they clearly wanted you to know that this one recognized God given right was not to be fucked with. At the least to the level of personal small arms, all restrictions and taxes upon this right, are unconstitutional and damn to hell all whom have chosen to ignore that fact and rule/legislate otherwise.
Just pointing out that the US Constitution doesn't cover a lot. And if we used your legal expertise, then just showing what you believe is true is fundamentally false. And go back to my post about the US Constitution and the BORs. The founding fathers who wrote them did not intend for states to be bound by it. Read Amendment 10 of the US Constitution.
But hey, go ahead and ignore laws you don't like. And enjoy prison. And when some gang bangers are having a gang bang on your lilly white ass, just remember, going to the Bureau of Prisons for help/protection would be hypocritical since you believe those agencies shouldn't exist.
But hey, go ahead and ignore laws you don't like. And enjoy prison. And when some gang bangers are having a gang bang on your lilly white ass, just remember, going to the Bureau of Prisons for help/protection would be hypocritical since you believe those agencies shouldn't exist.
As for "Shall not be infringed" to be true, which of the following do you accept as OK to buy a gun?
Someone as they are holding the gun they want to buy saying this perfect for shooting up a school?
Should a non-US citizen/openly proclaimed ISIL member be allowed to buy guns?
A serial rapist with a felony convictions?
Mentally unstable people?
A meth head clearly under the influence at the gun shop?
Someone as they are holding the gun they want to buy saying this perfect for shooting up a school?
Should a non-US citizen/openly proclaimed ISIL member be allowed to buy guns?
A serial rapist with a felony convictions?
Mentally unstable people?
A meth head clearly under the influence at the gun shop?
Lets face it. The ATF is just playing the game as defined by someone higher up on the Federal food chain. Maybe this is a sign that Biden doesn't have the election wrapped up like some have supposed. So the "Big Guy" told the ATF to hold off on this.
Sounds to me like this @THEIS person (never assume gender!!!
having talked with him, he is Registering negative on the douche scale vs the guy from Q who is off the charts.
Screw that @THEIS guy - all he does is post a bunch of nerdy bullshit about FEA-this and validation-that that supposedly prove how well his stuff works. BTW, I'm pretty sure he's a dude; most women aren't that boring.
What I really want from my hard-use firearms companies is a bunch of trolling-via-meme on Instagram.
NO! We want Gun Bunnies in bikinis. Memes are good, and toss in a few. But gun bunnies will prove that only real men can handle a $5000* DI AR-15.
*sights/scopes/lasers/suppressors/rail covers not included
If someone makes a threat with a firearm, it's a threat. Those ain't com under a number of other existing laws, because that violates the basic rights of others. Didn't matter if it comes via a rifle, baseball bat, broken bottle, pipebomb, or bare knuckles.
If a non-citizen is here legally, then yes, they should be allowed to purchase a firearm.
If we feel that serial rapist was rehabilitated to the point where they can be allowed to rejoin society (and realizing that this should be an incredibly high bar to clear), then they should have full rights restored (voting, gun ownership, whatever). If we (society) can't trust someone with legal gun ownership (or the right to vote, or any other basic right), then they need to be locked back up because they're going to find a weapon if they so desire.
Mentally unstable people shouldn't be free to roam if we can't sell them a gun, because they can find guns or any number of other ways with which to cause harm to themselves or others.
Drugs + guns don't mix, but that's also true of alcohol, fatigue, or stupidity, and we don't try to regulate the shit out of those things in an ineffective and intrusive manner.
Hi,
I can do Gun Bunnies but then I would be blamed for being in cahoots with Ukraine, Russia and Greece.......
Sincerely,
Theis
I can do Gun Bunnies but then I would be blamed for being in cahoots with Ukraine, Russia and Greece.......
Sincerely,
Theis
Not entirely accurate. K-street attorneys / lobbyists in DC write the laws, Congress just sells them on their behalf.
It's not there, but I think it's mentioned in another document.
Standing by as the legal experts among us explain what it really means.
@THEIS had laid out what would seem to be an effective prescription for dialing down the heat on this controversial issue. Let's check in with Q's Chief Marketing Officer to see how the plan is progressing:
At this point, it's like watching two schoolyard bullied fight it out - we really don't want either party to win, but itsure as hell is entertaining to watch them trade punches.
Living about 35ish miles south of Waco, love the # on the sign.
Imagine if ALL Firearm manufacturers, accessory manufacturers, ammunition company's, and EVERY 2nd amendment supporter stood as firm as Q.
I dont know the guy, I dont own any of his products, but Im standing with Q and any other person or company that believes the same. Why are we not supporting this guy? Why are so many in this community absolutely fine with (not poking the ATF bear)? When is it enough?
I dont know the guy, I dont own any of his products, but Im standing with Q and any other person or company that believes the same. Why are we not supporting this guy? Why are so many in this community absolutely fine with (not poking the ATF bear)? When is it enough?
While it may not be the best tactics, I can't fault a man who decided this is the line he'll go no further.
He's playing to his customer base as well.
R
I did the first one...
Didnt do number 2 or 3... sorry, aint got enough money to pay a lawyer, and didnt feel number 3 would really help, so...
Don't know about Ukraine but Russian and Greek chicks can be freaking hot... it's okay to be in cahoots especially if they are mail order
Last edited:
Could you maybe do women with guns, that are NOT from the Ukraine or Russia and maybe are fully clothed and maybe actually know how to use weapons and know how not to be covered in mud on their way to a photo shoot and maybe look like they have a personality that could talk about things other than fashion?
Maybe like how I'm pretty sure he hired @Geno C. wife for marketing stuff? (sorry can't remember her name here.)Could you maybe do women with guns, that are NOT from the Ukraine or Russia and maybe are fully clothed and maybe actually know how to use weapons and know how not to be covered in mud on their way to a photo shoot and maybe look like they have a personality that could talk about things other than fashion?
You’re absolutely right. However if we burned stuff down and took over police stations they’d treat us different. The atf and fb👁 seem to treat gun owning white folk different than BLM and antifa. Must of us know they wouldn’t hesitate one second to do us just like they did the gun owners at ruby ridge or Waco so we just bitch and moan. Hell, we don’t even do that loud enough for anyone to notice. BLM and antifa doesn’t want to be treated equal they want to be treated special and they darn sure are.
