Baldwin should have been arrested already
- Thread starter Lowlight
- Start date
- Tags
Time is short.
Judgement cometh, and that right quick.
true, but ignoring their "opinions" rather than hearing them out and offering rebuttal would be hypocritical.
although the glowie seems to be trolling, he could also be somebody that isn't actually bad, but just stupid.
FFS...this asshat's implying he got ahold of some confidential Pfizer docs, when the numbers and text are straight from the VAERS database, which I've spent a ton of time in. The same database that allows anyone to submit a record, such as the 14 instances of death that were from gun shot wounds. Yeah, the vaccine did that...sure it did. Plus the 1k plus records of adverse reactions with "none" in the description of said reaction.
everyone can see, what's going on.
they laugh because they know they're untouchable
and not because what i said was wrong.
they laugh because they know they're untouchable
and not because what i said was wrong.
Love the sign....
" The difference between the vaccine and Kyle Rittenhouse?
His shots actually work!"
Thanks to the omicron variant, the Biden administration has draconian plans
The omicron variant is doing exactly what viruses are supposed to do once they become established in a population: mutating in such a way that they are both more contagious and less serious. This is the symbiotic part of the virus-human re...
This is what is threatening revolution if Roe v Wade is knocked down.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Poll Shows Democrats Are Terrified of the Omicron Variant - Republicans Can Not Care Less | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
A poll at YouGov.com shows that Democrats act like sheep who believe nearly everything the corrupt media tells them about the China coronavirus while Republicans have the ability to think for themselves. A poll at YouGov.com released today shows the following not so unexpected results.
www.thegatewaypundit.com 
Anyone remember the Mariel Boatlift? How many countries do you think are getting rid of their problems by embedding them with the other border jumpers? Covid is the least of our worries.
80 House Republicans Help Pass Bill to Fund Federal Vax Database
Eighty House Republicans voted with Democrats on Tuesday to pass the Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act.
www.breitbart.com
80 House Republicans Help Pass Bill to Fund Federal Vax Database
Eighty House Republicans voted with Democrats on Tuesday to pass the Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act.www.breitbart.com
Holy SHIT... The Fucking cunts are all in on it.
no. she died a clueless dumb ass
not following
vote them out!!!!!80 House Republicans Help Pass Bill to Fund Federal Vax Database
Eighty House Republicans voted with Democrats on Tuesday to pass the Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act.www.breitbart.com
NYC woman who hit BLM protestors rejects plea deal in favor of trial
Kathleen Casillo, 52, appeared in court on Wednesday where she rejected a plea deal in favor of a trial after she was accused of hitting BLM protestors last December
Rebuttal is best saved for those who can debate with an open mind. These shit bags are agitators or feds.....imho
Roll Call 388 Roll Call 388, Bill Number: H. R. 550, 117th Congress, 1st Session
VOTE QUESTION: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, DESCRIPTION: Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act, VOTE TYPE: 2/3 Yea-And-Nay, STATUS: Passed
clerk.house.gov
Fuck BLM, don’t fuck with people and don’t play in the road.NYC woman who hit BLM protestors rejects plea deal in favor of trial
Kathleen Casillo, 52, appeared in court on Wednesday where she rejected a plea deal in favor of a trial after she was accused of hitting BLM protestors last Decemberwww.dailymail.co.uk
the comments in the article by the blm racists is gold. fk them
I'm not sure,but the woman he's holding on to sure looks like G Maxwell (sp ?)....who's on trial for her dealings involved with minors on Epstein island
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in Dobbs v. Jackson, a case challenging the constitutionality of a Mississippi law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued Roe v. Wade, "correctly recognized that the Constitution protects a woman's fundamental right to decide whether to end a pregnancy before viability.”
Justice Clarence Thomas pressed Prelogar on what the specific "right" is that she's defending?
(brief expansion on the question and narrowing of the response field)
"So the right specifically is abortion?" Thomas asked.
"It's the right of a woman prior to viability to control whether to continue with a pregnancy, yes.
"Thank you," said Thomas, ending that portion of his questioning.
MOAR
When deciding between the interests of a pregnant woman and the interests of an unborn child, “You can’t accommodate both interests. You have to pick.”
Kavanaugh then went on to point out how the courts should figure out how to make that choice. “What does the Constitution say about that?”
Period. Literally end of discussion. The rest is all noise.
On the one hand, a woman has a right to body autonomy and the right to make medical decisions without government interference. On the other, if exercising that right results in the violent death of another life, whose rights then prevail?
In 1973, Roe v. Wade weighed the same question and came down on the side of the woman’s rights over the unborn baby’s rights, but to get there, they had to force themselves to believe unscientific mythology about that unborn life.
The baby in question was consistently referred to as “a meaningless clump of cells” or a “zygote” or even a “parasite.” When the unborn human baby is dehumanized to such an extent, it eases the way for its tidy removal.
Tens of millions of extinguished “fetuses” later, and the dismal results of the evil arguments made in Roe look like a genocide now that science has caught up to the moral and ethical truths behind this ghastly procedure.
Chief Justice John Roberts, a fellow conservative, focused on the argument of fetal viability.
“Why would 15 weeks be an inappropriate line? Viability, it seems to me, doesn’t have anything to do with choice, but if it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time?” he asked Julie Rikelman, who represented the abortion clinic bringing the case.
Rikelman replied: “If the court were to move the line substantially backwards and 15 weeks is 9 weeks before viability, your honor, it may need to reconsider the rules around regulations because if it’s cutting the time period to obtain an abortion roughly in half, then those barriers are going to be much more important.”
The court’s liberals suggested overturning Roe would make the court appear political.
“Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?” Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart.
U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued Roe v. Wade, "correctly recognized that the Constitution protects a woman's fundamental right to decide whether to end a pregnancy before viability.”
Justice Clarence Thomas pressed Prelogar on what the specific "right" is that she's defending?
(brief expansion on the question and narrowing of the response field)
"So the right specifically is abortion?" Thomas asked.
"It's the right of a woman prior to viability to control whether to continue with a pregnancy, yes.
"Thank you," said Thomas, ending that portion of his questioning.
MOAR
When deciding between the interests of a pregnant woman and the interests of an unborn child, “You can’t accommodate both interests. You have to pick.”
Kavanaugh then went on to point out how the courts should figure out how to make that choice. “What does the Constitution say about that?”
Period. Literally end of discussion. The rest is all noise.
On the one hand, a woman has a right to body autonomy and the right to make medical decisions without government interference. On the other, if exercising that right results in the violent death of another life, whose rights then prevail?
In 1973, Roe v. Wade weighed the same question and came down on the side of the woman’s rights over the unborn baby’s rights, but to get there, they had to force themselves to believe unscientific mythology about that unborn life.
The baby in question was consistently referred to as “a meaningless clump of cells” or a “zygote” or even a “parasite.” When the unborn human baby is dehumanized to such an extent, it eases the way for its tidy removal.
Tens of millions of extinguished “fetuses” later, and the dismal results of the evil arguments made in Roe look like a genocide now that science has caught up to the moral and ethical truths behind this ghastly procedure.
Chief Justice John Roberts, a fellow conservative, focused on the argument of fetal viability.
“Why would 15 weeks be an inappropriate line? Viability, it seems to me, doesn’t have anything to do with choice, but if it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time?” he asked Julie Rikelman, who represented the abortion clinic bringing the case.
Rikelman replied: “If the court were to move the line substantially backwards and 15 weeks is 9 weeks before viability, your honor, it may need to reconsider the rules around regulations because if it’s cutting the time period to obtain an abortion roughly in half, then those barriers are going to be much more important.”
The court’s liberals suggested overturning Roe would make the court appear political.
“Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?” Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart.
Last edited:
Order
A federal district court judge rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s fully licensed Comirnaty vaccine.
The plaintiffs question whether the two products are, in fact, chemically identical. See, e.g., ECF No. 45 at 16:17-19. Indeed, the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action lists a redacted excipient for BLA-approved Comirnaty that does not appear on the ingredient list in the EUA letter. Compare ECF No. 1-5 at 9 (listing 11 components, including .450 ml per vial of a redacted excipient), with ECF No. 1- 6 at 7 (listing 10 components, all of which also appear on the Summary Basis list). Excipients are “inactive” ingredients like “coatings, binders, and capsules,” but they sometimes “may affect the safety and effectiveness of drug products.” United States v. Generix Drug Corp., 460 U.S. 453, 454-55 (1983). In Generix, the Supreme Court held that two products with the same active ingredients were nonetheless not the same “drug” under the FDCA where the district court had found that their different excipients created a reasonable possibility that the unlicensed drug was “less safe and effective” than the licensed one. Id. at 455-57.
and because the plaintiffs haven’t shown a “reasonable possibility” that excluding .450 ml of the redacted excipient from a vial of the EUA vaccine makes it any “less safe and effective” than Comirnaty, Generix, 460 U.S. at 455—I do not discount the FDA’s conclusion that the two vaccines are medically interchangeable. See ECF No. 1-6 at 3 n.8; ECF No. 31-13 at ¶¶ 7-9. Of course, that does not mean the two vaccines are legally indistinguishable—the FDA concedes they are not
A federal district court judge rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s fully licensed Comirnaty vaccine.
The plaintiffs question whether the two products are, in fact, chemically identical. See, e.g., ECF No. 45 at 16:17-19. Indeed, the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action lists a redacted excipient for BLA-approved Comirnaty that does not appear on the ingredient list in the EUA letter. Compare ECF No. 1-5 at 9 (listing 11 components, including .450 ml per vial of a redacted excipient), with ECF No. 1- 6 at 7 (listing 10 components, all of which also appear on the Summary Basis list). Excipients are “inactive” ingredients like “coatings, binders, and capsules,” but they sometimes “may affect the safety and effectiveness of drug products.” United States v. Generix Drug Corp., 460 U.S. 453, 454-55 (1983). In Generix, the Supreme Court held that two products with the same active ingredients were nonetheless not the same “drug” under the FDCA where the district court had found that their different excipients created a reasonable possibility that the unlicensed drug was “less safe and effective” than the licensed one. Id. at 455-57.
and because the plaintiffs haven’t shown a “reasonable possibility” that excluding .450 ml of the redacted excipient from a vial of the EUA vaccine makes it any “less safe and effective” than Comirnaty, Generix, 460 U.S. at 455—I do not discount the FDA’s conclusion that the two vaccines are medically interchangeable. See ECF No. 1-6 at 3 n.8; ECF No. 31-13 at ¶¶ 7-9. Of course, that does not mean the two vaccines are legally indistinguishable—the FDA concedes they are not
Last edited:
Next time you see me coming you better run....
Select instance - Invidious
invidious.snopyta.org
Select instance - Invidious
invidious.snopyta.org
A High School Football Player Rushed A School Shooter And Sacrificed His Own Life To Save His Classmates
In the wake of the shooting at a school in Michigan on Tuesday, tens of thousands of people have signed a petition to rename the local football stadium in honor of a student who was reportedly killed ...
How is this crap Constitutional?
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Seattle Recall Ballot of Marxist City Councilmember States: "Vote "NO" on the Rightwing Recall - Part of the Racist Rightwing Backlash" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Committed Marxist and Seattle Councilwoman Kshama Sawant used her key to break into the Seattle City Hall in 2020 and hold an unlawful protest with hundreds of Black Lives Matter protesters.
www.thegatewaypundit.com Medical staff now seems to be protected from the jab. However if you build rockets or are a government contractor employee
whnt.com
Federal judge denies ULA employees’ request for exemption to COVID-19 vaccine mandate
Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Abdul K. Kallon denied the plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order that would have prevented ULA from implementing its va…
whnt.com 
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends...John 15:13A High School Football Player Rushed A School Shooter And Sacrificed His Own Life To Save His Classmates
In the wake of the shooting at a school in Michigan on Tuesday, tens of thousands of people have signed a petition to rename the local football stadium in honor of a student who was reportedly killed ...www.barstoolsports.com
View attachment 7752069
Remind them of that . When they call for donations . I have and never will give a single dollar to the RNC or any political party .80 House Republicans Help Pass Bill to Fund Federal Vax Database
Eighty House Republicans voted with Democrats on Tuesday to pass the Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act.www.breitbart.com
The political class is our enemy !
Looks like my runt R Representative voted against it .
Whole bunch of CEOs have been retiring since the start of her trial.
On the day the Maxwel trial began, a lot of powerful people suddenly stepped down. It started with Dorsey from the twatters, but was followed by Walmart, and a bunch of others. Leading up to the trial there were several as well. This guy is just one of them but he is pictured with Maxwell.
Many believe that S is about to HTF. I'm not convinced because the sick evil monsters that will be revealed are all deepstate thugs so they will be protected.
EDIT: I forgot to add, several Dems have announced they are not running for reelection as well. Some think it's related to the the trial.
Last edited:
Isn't Africa on the wrong side of the world for it to appear in commiefornia first?
Basketball is retarded but this guy is awesome.
Its occurred to me that the Abortion case can be used to fire up the leftists and feminists for the midterms .
Could be the smoke screen for the day after the midterms talking point on why the midterms were such a landslide for dem's across the country .
What's the most enshrined right to the feminists and far leftist than Roe vs Wade ?
And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.
Mark 3:25
Similar threads
