I have been shooting 175gr. SMK in my .308, but was thinking about trying some 155's. I remember a post a while back, where somebody said that they where shooting a 155 load that would come close to the ballistics as a .300 WM as far as wind and drop. I couldn't find it with the search engine. anybody remember this? BTW what is the Ballistic coefficent of the Lapua 155's?
Re: 155gr. or 175gr.?
I used to shoot 175 smks in F/Tr. Now I'm shooting 155.5 Bergers. Think pretty much the same bc, w/ less weight, so you can push them faster. Works for me, w/ less recoil.
I used to shoot 175 smks in F/Tr. Now I'm shooting 155.5 Bergers. Think pretty much the same bc, w/ less weight, so you can push them faster. Works for me, w/ less recoil.
Re: 155gr. or 175gr.?
155's buck the wind better, have more retained energy @ 1k, and recoil less, what not to like about them, downside are Scenars are mail order only, and pumping them out at 3000fps will ruin your barrel faster.
155's buck the wind better, have more retained energy @ 1k, and recoil less, what not to like about them, downside are Scenars are mail order only, and pumping them out at 3000fps will ruin your barrel faster.
Re: 155gr. or 175gr.?
I use 155 scenars from Superior Shooting Systems that have been Boron Nitride coated; they work really well even during Louisiana Summers and low country.
I use 155 scenars from Superior Shooting Systems that have been Boron Nitride coated; they work really well even during Louisiana Summers and low country.
Re: 155gr. or 175gr.?
I use 155's for my long range loads. I have a box of 175's but I have not done a workup yet. I may just save them for my M40A1.
I use 155's for my long range loads. I have a box of 175's but I have not done a workup yet. I may just save them for my M40A1.
