2403-yard shot on a can of red bull, sounds like a load of bull.

This brings up an honest question for me-in that video he mentions spin drift, but he’s shooting at 500 yards. The question I have is how much spin drift would actually be observable at 500?
Referring to the overton guy’s video.
If you haven't figured it out yet, Overton is a retard.
 
Your getting defensive doesn't help your case very much.

And I've shot PLENTY of 155grn scenars from suppressed 24" 12 twist 5R BBL, but I didn't get 3K FPS out of them, I was just under 2900 with varget, not sure exactly how many grains, somewhere close to 48.

Honestly, it was fast and I used the round in a precision multi-gun match when 6.5creedmoor had just come out and, at the distances we were shooting in that match, 790 yards max I believe, I saw no reason to run the 6.5.

But, physics just works against a .30cal cross-section bullet at that BC at extended distances.
Now if you are talking about Berger 230 hybrid tactical out of a .300 norma, or even .300wn with a big powder charge, that's a different animal.

My point is that you guys claim to hit itty bitty objects that are only 2" wide at nearly a mile when it's hard to see that stuff at much closer distances.

I've shot .338LM at 1500 yards with a Schmidt & Bender 25x PMII and honestly, I don't think I could have even seen a soda can at that distance.

Here is that same optic at 1K yards on a different rifle maxed out on a clear day.
I honestly don't know if you could even see a can of soda at 1K with this optic, which at the time was about as good as it gets.

Not sure what you were running as far as glass goes in 2003 to hit a soda can at 1400 yards, but saying you did it with a .308 is very hard to believe. On the 1st shot. Sorry, I'm calling bullshit.

Sorry, I've shot too many thousands of rounds at long range to buy it.
Try someone else with less experience.


View attachment 8335904
Loaded 155 scenars for my cousin's 26" .308, hit pressure at ~3100 fps.
Dropped down to 2950 as that was where we found best consistency, both for group size and SD.
RS52 and Norma brass, don't have my log here, can't remember exactly how many grains.
 
1668545720348.gif
 
It was all I could bear to scroll through that video to find the relevant interaction (it's at about 31 minutes and 33minutes). Who has the time and patience to watch some guy in his combined gun/piano room spouting drivel about red dots and playing informercials for a whole fucking hour?

Plus - while I'm all for exposing Bloverton Window-licker, I don't know what "debating" is going to do to resolve the dilemma? Like expose him for not knowing the lingo of MRAD and MOA, or what?

Seems like a good way to waste your time and draw yet more attention to Window-licker.
 
Last edited:
It was all I could bear to scroll through that video to find the relevant interaction (it's at about 31 minutes and 33minutes). Who has the time and patience to watch some guy in his combined gun/piano room spouting drivel about red dots and playing informercials for a whole fucking hour?

Plus - while I'm all for exposing Bloverton Inch-dick, I don't know what "debating" is going to do to resolve the dilemma? Like expose him for not knowing the lingo of MRAD and MOA, or what?

Seems like a good way to waste your time and draw yet more attention to Inch-dick.
It's the same thing as a dogpile here.

Or, when driving past an accident, you will look.

So, yeah, if there ever is a livestream, people, even people from here are going to watch it.

Like seeing videos of train wrecks. We have seen a bunch of them and we will watch one more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Genesis1984
It was all I could bear to scroll through that video to find the relevant interaction (it's at about 31 minutes and 33minutes).


Why did you scroll? If you click the play button in the video, it's already time stamped and goes to the right spot.

Screenshot 2025-01-09 at 15.19.43.png


That's my BB code in my post. 1913 seconds is 31.8 minutes, takes you right to the point.
 
This brings up an honest question for me-in that video he mentions spin drift, but he’s shooting at 500 yards. The question I have is how much spin drift would actually be observable at 500?
Referring to the overton guy’s video.
virtually none
mmm it's about .1 mil which if you are trying to shoot that quarter at 500 yards you will absolutely factor in.
I think the guy is a total door knob but he did get that right.
 
mmm it's about .1 mil which if you are trying to shoot that quarter at 500 yards you will absolutely factor in.
I think the guy is a total door knob but he did get that right.
Elmer Keith said/taught to zero rifle 1 click (1/4minute ) left to compensate for spin drift. .1 mil would be ok I suppose for those of us who like to stretch the distances way out there.
 
Elmer Keith said/taught to zero rifle 1 click (1/4minute ) left to compensate for spin drift. .1 mil would be ok I suppose for those of us who like to stretch the distances way out there.
I read his book about big game hunting. He is the 'K' in the .333 OKH round. I know he liked the .35 Whelen. And he fancied large cartridges at moderate to close distances. Make big and leaking holes that leave blood trails and assist in exsanguination.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Genesis1984
I read his book about big game hunting. He is the 'K' in the .333 OKH round. I know he liked the .35 Whelen. And he fancied large cartridges at moderate to close distances. Make big and leaking holes that leave blood trails and assist in exsanguination.
Yes, he like big diameter and heavy bullets. He was from a different era that's for sure. Then along came Roy Weatherby and his how much powder can we put in cartridge and make this bullet fly at the speed of light. Total opposite approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws
Elmer Keith said/taught to zero rifle 1 click (1/4minute ) left to compensate for spin drift. .1 mil would be ok I suppose for those of us who like to stretch the distances way out there.
You have spin drift at all distances and it’s affected by the wind I’m talking a no wind situation. Make your solver do the heavy lifting (math) don’t just guess.
 
Because I have seen a few of his videos, it still comes up in my autosuggest. He had a short about bull elk being in range at 2200 yards.

Evidently, he will shoot at an elk at 2200 yards. No one else I know and certainly not people I know personally would shoot at any game animal at that distance.

Look at the roasting of Aaron at Gunwerks got for having his kid shoot an elk at 1376 yards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash
Because I have seen a few of his videos, it still comes up in my autosuggest. He had a short about bull elk being in range at 2200 yards.

Evidently, he will shoot at an elk at 2200 yards. No one else I know and certainly not people I know personally would shoot at any game animal at that distance.

Look at the roasting of Aaron at Gunwerks got for having his kid shoot an elk at 1376 yards.
Actually a 2 or 3 or 4 thousand yard shot on an elk or a gnat is pretty easy. Film said critter at two or three or four miles. Find an elk that looks the same, tie him up in the same basic location. After tying him up, back off a couple yards and blast away at him while filming the elk being shot only. Then go back to the original distance, film said Hawkeye shooting his .243 or whatever our intrepid marksman is purporting to shoot, and film him shooting. Tie the film of the blasted elk (or gnat) with the ole Hawkeye (or Elmer Fudd if you prefer) and there you go, taking out an elk at 4 miles with your trusty .223. (Or whatever, .22lr, Daisy Red Rider, whatever).
 
This was A-A-ron from Gunwerks, not the window-licker. Real vs youtubes fraud.

It ain't sky bustin' if the ducks fall dead...and that's that. "In range" isn't the same for everyone.

What's "ethical" for one person might not be for another. Personally, if you give a shit how someone else hunts within the regulations there is something fucking wrong with you, and you live a small and meaningless life. Choke yourself.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: lash and LR1845
This was A-A-ron from Gunwerks, not the window-licker. Real vs youtubes fraud.

It ain't sky bustin' if the ducks fall dead...and that's that. "In range" isn't the same for everyone.

What's "ethical" for one person might not be for another. Personally, if you give a shit how someone else hunts within the regulations there is something fucking wrong with you, and you live a small and meaningless life. Choke yourself.
Alls I can say, forget what I can hit in a shooting match. If the deer is further than 250 yards, he / she was having a lucky day. Cause I’m not even gonna try.

Edit: I do know and have seen long range tv shots being fraudulent. Reported this before. Watched a show where a deer was shot at close to 1000 yards. Deer dropped like he had been hit with a 105 howitzer. Next show, advertising a different product that supported the previous show, showed the exact same deer falling the exact same way. Simple stock photo shots. Looks so real. Is so false.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tx_Aggie
One of the great things about the current trend in "accuracy challenges" across the internet, is that you can see just how much luck is involved with skill.

I can personally care less about what the other guy is doing, as long as they are being honest about it. Unfortunately, the trend with self-video editing is that honesty often takes a back seat to footage that will generate more views.
 
I’d like to follow around some of the guys for a couple of days that get their panties all in knots about alleged violations of their hoity-toity “ethics”, to see if in general, they live their lives with such high standards when it comes to things like driving, financing, reading to your kids, brushing your teeth, running your business etc.
 
I’d like to follow around some of the guys for a couple of days that get their panties all in knots about alleged violations of their hoity-toity “ethics”, to see if in general, they live their lives with such high standards when it comes to things like driving, financing, reading to your kids, brushing your teeth, running your business etc.

I'm actually pretty decent in all of those areas... :D

I'll screw it up in a second though if it involves stubbing my toe, being polite to a rude person, or muslims.
 
You guys may be right. He claims his shot placement at 2200 yards is better than another person's shot placement at 400 yards.

I personally would have a problem shooting a game animal at 2200 yards. Even with a well-built rifle and optic, even with my best trigger squeeze on my best day, I don't know what the wind is doing and more specifically the animal could move. I just used shooter's calculator and input data for 7 PRC 175 gr. Time of flight to 2200 yards is 4.52 seconds.

That's a long time and an animal could move either completely out of the way or just enough to get injured with a rump shot.

So, in the end, I am not that good. And the people I know who hunt would not shoot that far. Including some who are very good at shooting at distance.
 
There's a difference between being good, and making outlandish claims.

Hitting the vitals of an elk at 2,200 yards cold bore isn't good, it is outlandish. You're talking a 2/3 MOA target height at that distance, and 1 MOA windage. Regardless of which hot 300/338 magnum you're hunting with, you're looking at ~1.5 - 2 inches PER FPS vertical dispersion at 2,200 yards.

My guess is he gets too many whispy little beard hairs in his powder dispenser to keep that kind of ES/SD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws
Ultimately, I think he is just trolling. I don't know if he even hunts. Paper and steel? Sure.

But what is important to me in shooting a game animal is impact velocity. How does a particular bullet perform at a range of impact velocities? Hornady's PH 175 gr ELD-X technically starts to open at 1600 FPS but it is recommended to impact no lower than 1800 fps.

Impact velocity at 2200 yards is 948 fps. That is roughly about half of what is needed.

But I am sure he is a smart guy and can do the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggler1833
Deer and elk are easy to kill with a gun. They're pretty easy to kill with a modern bow. People kill them here with an atlatl, which is a shitty weapon if there ever was one. They're not armored at all. They're soft and their vitals are not well protected. Hit them right and they go down.

I'm not going to argue with you, but I've seen them stacked with .223 and .30 subs. But honestly, if they run off and I can't find them, oh well. It's a deer. Waste bugs me, but I'm not going to loose sleep over it. I was given dominion so I don't have to worry so much or wring my hands over how someone else hunts. Where I live you have to keep a sharp eye out so they don't ruin your vehicle.

I guess I get it if you're a dirt worshiper who says a prayer over the carcass and thanks the great spirit, but to me it's just harvesting venison. If I'm picking apples I try not to drop any, but if I do I'm not going to worry to much about it.