• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Rifle Scopes Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

BigBrother

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 27, 2007
687
5
New England
Ok, besides the obvious that there are fewer parts to break...

For a long time the fixed power Mark 4s were more expensive than the variables. I was about to post links but it looks like the variables are now more expensive.

In any case, are the fixed somehow not the "upgraded hunting" scopes the variables are? Is there any other difference?
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

To me, Leupold took the proven "Mark4" name and stuck on anything it could to charge more money to basically the Vari-X line of scopes. I have a Mark4-16x and love it.

Cut
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

The fixed M3 and M1 are the only real MK4s IMO.The variables are just relabled Vari x3s.Even the tube is thicker on the fixed powers.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

The fixed MK4s are truely a different animal than the rebadged variable VX3s. The fixed MK4s are the real fucking deal.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dmg308</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The fixed M3 and M1 are the only real MK4s IMO.The variables are just relabled Vari x3s.Even the tube is thicker on the fixed powers. </div></div>

Umm, aren't they 30mm just the same?
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

The variables MK4 are nice but they are not as rugged as the fixed power MK4 scope. I use 2 of the fixed scopes and 2 of the variable and I prefer the fixed powered scopes.

Mike @ CSGW
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BigBrother</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dmg308</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The fixed M3 and M1 are the only real MK4s IMO.The variables are just relabled Vari x3s.Even the tube is thicker on the fixed powers. </div></div>

Umm, aren't they 30mm just the same? </div></div>

Thicker tube walls. Same 30mm outside diameter.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Got it. Thank you. What about the knob "feel" (comparing apples to apples- an M1 vs. an M1). Same?
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: csGunWorks.com</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The variables MK4 are nice but they are not as rugged as the fixed power MK4 scope. I use 2 of the fixed scopes and 2 of the variable and I prefer the fixed powered scopes.

Mike @ CSGW
</div></div>


a very solid +1. The fixed powers are built almost like tanks. the only difference I'd make, given the knob structure(similar to IOR) is protective caps for the fixed power. other than that they're awesome. Early on a few years ago when I was first looking for glass for long range shooting I specifically stayed away from the variable power scopes because of this reason. Just check out the object bell and the thickness of the scope body.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 7mmRM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The fixed MK4s are truely a different animal than the rebadged variable VX3s. The fixed MK4s are the real fucking deal. </div></div>

Exactly why I can't bring my self to buy a scope from a company that charges that much more money for a "Tactical Matte Black" paint job....without even being FFP or MIL/MIL!!!!
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 7mmRM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The fixed MK4s are truely a different animal than the rebadged variable VX3s. The fixed MK4s are the real fucking deal. </div></div>

Yup!!
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

I e-mailed Leupold a while back about this, the difference between the variable MK4 and VX3. Was told several differences, only remember 2. Tube walls thicker and HD erector assemblies on MK4's. Never owned a VX but I know my MK is tough, I,ve accidentally made it prove itself
shocked.gif
. Always heard the fixed were the toughest but I would imagine thats true with any line of scopes, just the nature of the beast.

edit: Oh ya, etched reticles was another dif.

okie
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

In theory, the fixed power should be brighter and clearer (less lenses). Whether one can see the difference is another story. Also, fixed is a more simple design. Less parts, less moving parts. All things being equal, should be more robust. Then again, these NF, S&B, Hensoldt variables are so well built, fixed versions might be overkill. Throwing the scope 20 feet up into the air and landing on rocky dirt over and over and surviving with repeatable zero...what more do you need?


Like others have said, the fixed have thicker tubes. That means a stronger scope. Watch slow-mo video of recoil on scopes and it makes sense why nice thick strong tubes make for more durability. They don't wobble and bend as much, which spares the internals a lot of abuse. Some flex is a good thing. But hard-kicking rifles destroy many scopes for a reason....
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Cool. And re: my follow up?...

"What about the knob "feel" (comparing apples to apples- an M1 vs. an M1). Same?"
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BigBrother</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Cool. And re: my follow up?...

"What about the knob "feel" (comparing apples to apples- an M1 vs. an M1). Same?" </div></div>

For years the fixed MK4's had a HD erector system, stronger than that of the variables, but I don't know if that's changed as of late.

As to the feel, well that can vary from individual scope to scope of the same model. Lots of things involved including assembly differences in the production run, amount and consistancy of the lube used, and slight differences in o-ring dimensions all stack up to make a difference in the feel. Also, they'll feel different when comparing a new out-of-the-box example to another that's had lots of 'miles' on it.

In my experience, I currently own MK4's in 10x M1 and M3, a 16x M1 and an M3 LR 3.5-10x the straight power models seem to have better, more defined 'clicks', both audible and tactile.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Just to clarify, the rep I spoke with that said the MK4's had HD erectors WAS talking about thier variables. Clicks on my MK4 are excellent but Spotcheck is exactly right, that can literally change from scope to scope. I'd sure like to find a screamin deal on a older fixed though, that 16x M1 would fit me quite nice Spotcheck.
wink.gif


okie
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

The clicks are about the best I've had. I have an old one and it's been great but I just don't like the M1 tall knobs anymore...

J~
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Not to contradict you guys, but just curious- called Leupold on an unrelated matter and decided to ask them the difference between the variables and fixed- they said nothing- nothing in the tube, nothing whatsoever. What do you think- just BS?
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

They are famous for not knowing shit in their support. Fixed Mk4s have a .1 thick tube the variables are .08.Like Ripley said believe it or not.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

I sure dont know. All I can do is tell you what I was told.


edit: Oh, I just reread your post. Thought he was comparing VX3's to MK4 like I was. OK, now I'll STFU.


okie
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

imho none of the leupolds are the same since they're made overseas.

that's why i stick with burris (signature select, black diamond, erodiamond, xtr - the usa made ones).

not to mention the few times i have dealt with their customer service its quick and easy and is in the usa so they speak english.

i recently bought a xtr624 and love it. got the fineplex reticle - wow!
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jw1911</div><div class="ubbcode-body">imho none of the leupolds are the same since they're made overseas.

that's why i stick with burris (signature select, black diamond, erodiamond, xtr - the usa made ones).

not to mention the few times i have dealt with their customer service its quick and easy and is in the usa so they speak english.

i recently bought a xtr624 and love it. got the fineplex reticle - wow! </div></div>


Mark 4s are made in the USA only the glass is sourced overseas. Its been that way for along time.I'm pretty sure when you call Leupold techs its in the USA as well.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Don't get me wrong - the quality (in my experience) is what one would expect: very high. But since I work in an American factory I prefer to purchase 100% American made products when ever possible. I also own a Ziess - simply "Assembled in USA". I just recently sold a Trijicon Accupoint 2.5-10x56 on Gunbroker because I did not notice until after a month of owning it that it was made in Japan. I assumed being Trijicon it was made in the USA. However the Ziess Conquest I own is of such quality I am going to keep it. Its not only a matter of brand loyalty to Burris but a matter of my own manner of patriotism. I believe the most important thing we can do to support ourselves is to buy from one another. When you by an American product your supporting your neighbors, your family... any one who works and they in turn support you. Its a cycle that in my opinion deregulation and NAFTA and free trade in general have started sinking our ship. Even the boots I wear are made in the USA. If I can at all possible buy it - I will even if I have to pay more for a slightly inferior product. I believe in it that much.

Just my two cents and probably will get deleted for being political. Any who no telling how many folks I pissed off but I stand by what I say: Buy American!

If it make since to you check out:

www.madeinusa.com
www.madeinusa.org
www.buyamerican.com


-jw1911
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

I'm just a little confused? Some Burris is made in the USA and you by them. The Zeiss is assembled in the USA and you buy them. Leupold builds mk4s in the USA and they aren't eligable?I like to by USA when they provide the superior product.I will not buy an inferior product just to buy US made.

It just does no one any good to say that Leupolds are made in China when that is not the universal truth.They like alot of other companies make cheaper lines overseas because a segment of the market demands it.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

I did not say leupold was made in china, just overseas. I do not know where they are made i tend to not look at items after i notice they are not made in USA.

and if you notice a few posts back i specified, and you quoted me on it, that i only buy sig select, eurodiamond, black diamond and xtr for the fact of where they are made.

I guess i have not looked at any leupold optics lately (at least not mk4) because the last thing i remember seeing was not made in USA. I did want a binocular very recently and may go back because i do not know of a single binoc made in USA which is sad. i do own 1 older leupold scope that clearly says "made in USA" on it and i love it. still clear as the day my dad bought it many years ago.

the ziess i did not buy - it was given to me and is not from a 3rd world country that has no living standards and is a high enough quality and the fact it was a gift i will not trade it off. but guess what, it does cross my mind every time i take that little .243 on a hunt. every time.

sorry but i think that buying American is the only way to save our economy - if everything is made overseas or across borders... where will the jobs be?

like i said is a cycle.

buy from here = jobs here
buy from there = jobs there

again, just my 2 cents.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

ooh i like what i see. so do you know of a list of which models are manufactured at that factory?

as a machinist myself I know some those machines and what they are capable of.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

i actually feel a little violated now. after talking to a leupold dealer a couple years ago i was under the impression that just about everything leupold was foreign made but turns out that about everything he carried was the low end stuff. there is a big difference there.

i am actually in the market for a scope now and will include leupold in list of considerations.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

So here's what I don't get. Leupold seems to be comprised of geniuses and dullards.

Geniuses: Every new Mark 4 I've handled has been great- I mean top freakin notch, and I've dealt with a few since I've been troubleshooting a problem with my optic. Glass clear as can be, etc.

Dullards: In part of that process, I had to send one back that they disassembled and checked for errors, then rebuilt. It was a mockery of a scope. Big chunks of dust visible in the tube, a double reticle due to lenses not being aligned- I'm not exaggerating in the least. Made me doubt Leupold hard core.

Dullards: A lot of times their technical support has no idea what I'm talking about, and I have to slowly explain the issue. And I'm not talking rocket science- just the same type of chat that goes on here (optical zero, travel range, 20 MOA base, etc.)

So what gives? Who there is making the good calls and who the bad? Because they seem to suffer from SERIOUS multiple personality disorder.

EDIT- rather than speculation (well I once had an incident, etc. etc.), I'd love to get a reply here from someone who deals with them at the corporate level (dealer? former employee?) Someone who can give some real insight into their makeup and talents (or lack in certain areas).
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Im not a leupold lacky for sure.IMO they have dropped the ball on the tactical scopes and rode their name for to long.I hope they can bring it back as it is a good American company.As I've said many times their tech dept is 50/50 decent or useless.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

well maybe now on the 50/50 tech support i'm not sure i am considering leupold.

i do know for a fact that burris cust service or tech support whatever you want to call it is top notch. and the forever warranty stands. i had a signature select scope i bought 3rd or 4th or 5th hand or something - alot of people owned it. had to send it back and they sent it back to me in 3 weeks crystal clear no specks and the movements working again.

not to mention last time i sent an email i got a reply the very next day.

customer support goes a long way in my book.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

I just started posting so i will throw in a few comments which represent approx. 20 yrs of dealing with the original fixed power Ultra/Mk.4 Leupolds of which I've owned 15-20 (m-1 10x,16x,20x and m-3 6x and 10x). Most of the comments stated here are spot-on so far.Leupold exists to sell scopes.The leupold of 15 years ago is gone.You will rarely have opportunity @ SHOT or any other venue to talk to an actual optical engineer.If still there, Garth Kendigg
is your "go to" guy in customer svc. If you find a "spot" or any internal reticle/ lense abberation and ask them to "clean" your scope, they will do just that----externally. The lenses are not usually removed to clean the interior surface of the lens/lenses cell. Canted reticles of minor deviation have from time to time been considered acceptable. Mushiness/difficulty of knob rotation/ crispness of clicks are usually and correctly attributable on a new scope to the durometer of the seals or quantity of lubricant thereupon. No disrespect to those who own them, the variable mk4 is not the same integrity scope as the fixed---often what appears as a 1-piece tube is actually 3 separate pieces. Fixed mk 4 scopes are one piece t-6064 with nominal .1" tubular wall thickness. Before he died, Dick Thomas assailed the marketing gimmickery of the indexed glass claims stating that only one set of indexed glass lens cell (out of hundreds) was able to deliver the purported increase of light transmission in comparison to their earlier lens. As you know, there literature claims transmission levels "---up to 9x.xx". It does not purport that your scope will deliver to this level.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

JW the 50/50 comment is on the knowledge of some of the phone techs.It has been leupolds policy to fix anything for any reason I would'nt sweat the warranty part.
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Leupold's Knowledge base as far a Service tech's go is a crapshoot.

Below is a series of e-mails I had with Leupold technical support. My original e-mail was through their own website, so it is not copied here, but my question was the cost of converting my Mk4 M3 to M2 dials, and the cost of replacing a Mildot reticle with a TMR:

Note: I've redacted my personal information.
----------------------------------------------------
<span style="font-style: italic">Leupold Customer Service
Product Specialist Group
Phone (503) 526-1400
Reference Call #

Caller: - Robert
Phone:
Summary: Leupold

Mr. :

Yes, the TMR can be installed. The cost is $159.99.

The scope would need to have been manufactured in the year 2008 or 2009
in order for us to install either the M2 adjustments. If it was
manufactured prior to that, the dials would not be compatible.
We should be able to install the M1 style adjustments.
The service charge to convert to the M2 or M1 $129.99. (for the pair,
windage & elevation)

Sharon
___________________________________________________


My response:

Sharon,

Thank you for the information. But your explanation on the turret conversion has prompted more questions and some confusion.

M3 scopes have 1 moa adjustments for elevation, and 1/2 moa adjustment for windage.

M2 scopes have 1/2 MOA adjustments for elevation and 1/2 MOA adjustments for windage.

If I am converting dials from M3 to M2; why would I want to change both Dials? The windage on a M3 is already 1/2 MOA???? So only the elevation would need to be changed from 1 moa to 1/2 moa on a M3 to M2 conversion.

The M3 dials have been 1/2 moa windage adjustment since 2003, if not before. In 2007 Leupold started making MK 4 scopes with M2 dials which is no more than using a M3 windage dial cam/gears for elevation. What changes occured in 2008/2009, that now made the dials not compatable?

Confused......

Further, are you saying that if my MK4 M3 was made in 2007 (it has an R suffix), I cannot convert the Elevation dial to M2, but I could convert the elevation adjustments only to M1, leaving the M3/M2 1/2 MOA windage alone?

In addition, in an earlier phone call in January 2009 that I made to Leupold CS, I was told when inquiring about a conversion of a VX-III LR 4.5-14x40mm w/ 30mm tube, w/SF, to M2 dials I was told that it could only be converted to M1 dials, and that <span style="font-weight: bold">"only MK 4 scopes that started life as M3's or M2's could be converted to M2's or back to M3's".</span>

So I am really confused.

Thanks for your time..

Bob
___________________________________________________________________

Leupold's new response:

----------------------------------------------------
Leupold Customer Service
Product Specialist Group
Phone (503) 526-1400
Reference Call #

Caller: - Robert
Phone:
Summary: Leupold

Mr. :

Sorry, my answer was confusing.

If the scope is a variable power M3 we can put the M2's on. Regardless
of age. And no you don't need to change the windage. One adjustment
is $89.00.

It's just the M1 scopes that we need to worry about the age or year of
manufacture if you are converting to M3 or M2.

<span style="font-weight: bold">And we cannot change the adjustments on the fixed power Mark IV.
</span>
Sharon
___________________________________________________
</span>


Now a couple of things are striking about these e-mails;

1) Leupold service tech's do not know their products, as it took nearly a month from my original question, to the last answer.

2) Fixed power MK 4 are a completely different animal from the variable Mk 4's, in a much as you can change a variable M3 to M2 and M1 dials, but you cannot change a fixed power MK4 from M3 or M1 to anything else.

Bob
 
Re: Are the fixed Leupolds better than the variables?

Hah, I love the circus this thread is becoming, but in a good way! Really informative and an interesting view into things. To swing the pendulum yet again, I posit this-

Nearly everyone seems to be in agreement that in the past X years they've fallen. Yet, as far as I can tell, the Army continues to grace their systems with *current* lenses from them- the M2 on the M21s, and I imagine any M24s still being made (?) I'm assuming any M24 that is relatively modern or needs a replacement is not getting some "secret run" M3As that Leupold is making in small batches?

So point being- whatever optic sold the Army on Leupold to begin with, the current ones have to be at least close to them, since they're now using the same optics we're buying every day. No?