• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

"Biden admin takes aim at hunters in latest regulation: 'Preventing Americans from hunting'"

That’s right, when your argument turns out to be completely self-centered and it’s become obvious, just resort to ridiculing the other person and name calling. Obfuscate and redirect.

Moore comments from boomers that think hunting is a constitutional right.

And little faith that Americans will stand up when they actually have to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xsn10s
Separating the hunting and second amendment issue has always been the tactic of socialists as they erode first one and then the other, slowly over time.

I’m beginning to wonder about you gung ho LGOWI dude.

When you start to parse rights as to which are okay and which are just meh, you’ve already lost as a person. Buck up and take responsibility.

Go ahead and be prepared. A person should be, but stacking all those eggs in that one basket will not likely be your best option.

You do you, just don’t insist that everybody else adopt your general apathy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xsn10s
That’s right, when your argument turns out to be completely self-centered and it’s become obvious, just resort to ridiculing the other person and name calling. Obfuscate and redirect.
I’m not the one they can’t figure out a way to survive.
You're not the boss of me youngster lol.
I retract my previous statements.

This well throughout retort has changed my mind.
 
That’s right, when your argument turns out to be completely self-centered and it’s become obvious, just resort to ridiculing the other person and name calling. Obfuscate and redirect.
Yup exactly. Besides when I was sitting in the comforts of my home as a civilian I answered the call when I got my recall papers.
 
This shit and everything else is only a problem because men sell their soul to wear a badge to enforce the laws of tyrants for a paycheck. Period. Full stop. Maybe one day domestic terrorists will be treated as such and then the politicians are fucked considering LEO are the only reason they exist and have any power whatsoever. Stop respecting LEO and all this and everything like it goes away.
 
Separating the hunting and second amendment issue has always been the tactic of socialists as they erode first one and then the other, slowly over time.

I’m beginning to wonder about you gung ho LGOWI dude.

When you start to parse rights as to which are okay and which are just meh, you’ve already lost as a person. Buck up and take responsibility.

Go ahead and be prepared. A person should be, but stacking all those eggs in that one basket will not likely be your best option.

You do you, just don’t insist that everybody else adopt your general apathy.
100% agree.

Edited: 110% agree.
 
I’ll say it again.

A million other things before this could be of any concern to constitutional amendments.

But my all means. Continue to be misdirected.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: xsn10s
This shit and everything else is only a problem because men sell their soul to wear a badge to enforce the laws of tyrants for a paycheck. Period. Full stop. Maybe one day domestic terrorists will be treated as such and then the politicians are fucked considering LEO are the only reason they exist and have any power whatsoever. Stop respecting LEO and all this and everything like it goes away.
At least a few get it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: xsn10s
I’ll say it again.

A million other things before this could be of any concern to constitutional amendments.

But my all means. Continue to be misdirected.
It doesn't need to be amended to be taken away. Sorry you cannot see this.
 
Like I said if people cannot even stand up against infringements like this I place no value on them for any kind of action.
 
Like I said if people cannot even stand up against infringements like this I place no value on them for any kind of action.
And what action other than bitching on the internet are you actually doing?

How much time have you spent at your senators or congressional representatives office?

Because you are saying, from what I’m hearing, is that petitioning the government is the solution to the government.

I bet you think we can vote ourselves out of all this too.

😂🤣😂
 
Sigh…..

There are a ton of work around for everything you listed.

Worried about not being able to hunt federal land using lead? Use copper solids.

Worried about target shooting lead on federal land. Use copper, go to a gun range, private ground etc.

Worried about them coming around and confiscating lead bullets. Lmao ( this was my favorite). Do you not think we would be in a civil war at that point?
You’re beyond help

You cede ground to the enemy.


They will ban lead for all hunting. Then private range. Then manufacture / sale



Idiot
 
Oh.

And if you are worried about not being able to get those lead bullets, powder or primers then there is no better time than the present.
Once again.

Idiot

They play the long game.

The next generation isn’t old enough or rich enough or alive to stockpile.
 
And what action other than bitching on the internet are you actually doing?

How much time have you spent at your senators or congressional representatives office?

Because you are saying, from what I’m hearing, is that petitioning the government is the solution to the government.

I bet you think we can vote ourselves out of all this too.

😂🤣😂
This is to make people aware of the current situation. Currently I don't need to go to my local rep because he shops at my place of employment. So he, my boss, and anyone around have discussions all the time. Again you just divert and redirect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash
Oh.

And if you are worried about not being able to get those lead bullets, powder or primers then there is no better time than the present.
I can walk into my shop right now and buy bullets, powder and primers. I just put in a large order for my boss last week.
 
And who’s gonna enforce the lead bans ?

That’s right. The cops and fish cops

That half you faggots still support
Sheriffs won't likely support any actions against the 2A. They've shown that across the nation. Fish cops well have to see. I really don't see any cops supporting actions against the 2A. Because look who's trying to get rid of them lol.
 
clearly we need to vote harder and more frequently. And bring back tarring and feathering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eca7891
Once again.

Idiot

They play the long game.

The next generation isn’t old enough or rich enough or alive to stockpile.
There isn’t enough time for a long game on this.

You for one should know this.

MASSIVE global change will take place BEFORE the next generation. You know this too.
 
This is to make people aware of the current situation. Currently I don't need to go to my local rep because he shops at my place of employment. So he, my boss, and anyone around have discussions all the time. Again you just divert and redirect.
So zero.

Got it.

You can say zero and use less words.
 
Yeah.

You made a sporting post and are trying to turn it into a constitutional right.

I was addressing your original topic.

If you want to make a constitution argument for lead ammo base it on self defense not hunting.
 
Yeah.

You made a sporting post and are trying to turn it into a constitutional right.

I was addressing your original topic.

If you want to make a constitution argument for lead ammo base it on self defense not hunting.
You don't even know the hunting regs so I don't expect you to understand this. The whole point of the thread is they are eroding our rights by several means. This is only one of their means of attack. Not my problem if you can't understand it.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: eca7891 and BurtG
you want to make a constitution argument for lead ammo base it on self defense not hunting.
Yet the oligarchy uses sporting as a reason to ban or allow guns. So

“”

Import restrictionsThe GCA created what is known as the "sporting purposes" standard for imported firearms, saying that they must "be generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes".

“”



Gotta play the game they play
Win hearts and minds of fudds while your at it
 
  • Like
Reactions: xsn10s and lash
Every side needs cannon fodder.

I guess you are ours.
 
You think any of that has sway?

I sure as hell don’t save for last one in which I have given years to.
 
How much have you donated to gun rights groups ?
How many protests have you attended ?
How many new gun people have you made by introducing shooters , giving away ARs / cans / scopes ammo etc ?
His answer is zero. It doesn’t fit his battle plan of preparedness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG and xsn10s
I'm not concerned considering you just started shooting nrl22 a few years back. My guess is you still live with your parents.
My elementary school kid can do better.
 
You think any of that has sway?

I sure as hell don’t save for last one in which I have given years to.
Yeah those court battles GOA and SAF and state level groups have been winning repeatedly don’t have sway

No
Gun bans struck down , no constitutional carry or shall issue everywhere.

nope no sway
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash and xsn10s
Is it 6 year old or elementary school kid? Make up your mind lol.
Either would beat you in a debate.

So you pick.

I thought 6th grade you give you a bit more credit than 6.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: xsn10s
Yeah those court battles GOA and SAF and state level groups have been winning repeatedly don’t have sway

No
Gun bans struck down , no constitutional carry or shall issue everywhere.

nope no sway
Really. No.


Why? Because a majority of it only had impact in the most radical of states.

But they actually had a constitutional argument and won so it’s great for the people in those states.


When they overturn the NFA I’ll give them some actual credit.
 
Yeah those court battles GOA and SAF and state level groups have been winning repeatedly don’t have sway

No
Gun bans struck down , no constitutional carry or shall issue everywhere.

nope no sway
I agree. All these bans, law, policies have been getting struck down. Glad I contributed to the SAF on and off for the last thirty years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
Because a majority of it only had impact in the most radical of states
BC27FCD8-5435-4EAE-8B71-1046BC3001C4.gif


351703E4-027C-403C-9DB9-92E6E9E7FADF.gif




“”
Bruen was a 6-3 decision that expanded the Second Amendment beyond the bounds laid out in Heller — it struck down a 109-year-old New York law that limited who could obtain a license to carry a concealed firearm.

“”
Larry Hogan (R) on Tuesday ordered his administration to ease the state's licensing rules for carrying a concealed handgun, saying a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision makes it unconstitutional to require applicants to show “a good and substantial reason” for seeking such a permit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: xsn10s
Really. No.

Because a majority of it only had impact in the most radical of states.

When they overturn the NFA I’ll give them some actual credit.
Okay. Let’s focus on that. What have you done towards this goal? If it matters, you become part of the vocal opposition.

Or are you just sitting there prepping for the battle you think you crave?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: eca7891 and xsn10s
Really. No.


Why? Because a majority of it only had impact in the most radical of states.

But they actually had a constitutional argument and won so it’s great for the people in those states.


When they overturn the NFA I’ll give them some actual credit.
View attachment 8236336

View attachment 8236337



“”
Bruen was a 6-3 decision that expanded the Second Amendment beyond the bounds laid out in Heller — it struck down a 109-year-old New York law that limited who could obtain a license to carry a concealed firearm.

“”
Larry Hogan (R) on Tuesday ordered his administration to ease the state's licensing rules for carrying a concealed handgun, saying a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision makes it unconstitutional to require applicants to show “a good and substantial reason” for seeking such a permit.
OMG he really doesn't get it lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG and lash
Okay. Let’s focus on that. What have you done towards this goal? If it matters, you become part of the vocal opposition.

Or are you just sitting there prepping for the battle you think you crave?
Anything to deflect from all your previous statements?
 
View attachment 8236336

View attachment 8236337



“”
Bruen was a 6-3 decision that expanded the Second Amendment beyond the bounds laid out in Heller — it struck down a 109-year-old New York law that limited who could obtain a license to carry a concealed firearm.

“”
Larry Hogan (R) on Tuesday ordered his administration to ease the state's licensing rules for carrying a concealed handgun, saying a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision makes it unconstitutional to require applicants to show “a good and substantial reason” for seeking such a permit.
How does that impact those in Indiana, for example?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BurtG
Okay. Let’s focus on that. What have you done towards this goal? If it matters, you become part of the vocal opposition.

Or are you just sitting there prepping for the battle you think you crave?
If he's prepping for battle he's already lost lol. Makes a big internet footprint on an open mic lol. If he posted any pics then they'll be able to figure out his locations. His game is over before he started lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash and BurtG