(Considering target effect/hunting + humane shooting)
This was partially spurned by the sticky post of Bohem et al “Caliber Choices–Comparisons and Applications”, and the post(s) that talked about humane hunting vs. distance and caliber.
I want a long distance rifle and have learned from this site that .308 is no longer the best option. I read the article comparing the .260rem, 6.5*47lapua, and the 6.5creedmor; an excellent article, but it contains no info about the rounds affect on target. As soon as I made up my mind on a 260rem I stumbled across a post on the 284win & 7mm-08…back to square one.
I will be moving to Lake Havasu, AZ ~6months. From the initial recon of the site it looks as though I will be able to shoot at distances limited only by my pocketbook and skill. My primary targets will be; rocks, ground varmints, coyotes, and bigger rocks. Once I have found a great spot I intend to set up a semi-permanent hide and steel as far as the scope can see.
Problem- I want a sniping round that has good effect on target at range. <span style="text-decoration: underline">The potential candidates are .260rem, 284win, and the 7mm-08</span>. I want to use the 223 and 308 to bookend the data to give it some validity (perhaps with the 338lm a bit farther to the right).
My primary considerations for a caliber are; effect on target at range, ability to get/manufacture ammo, recoil, service life of components, cost.
I will purchase the equipment and make my first foray into reloading after I get settled in - this is why I am not inquiring about the bigger calibers. I need something affordable for the first year.
Before we go any further – is there a program that will spit out calculations of energy in ft-lbs based on bullet weight, speed of travel, distance traveled, etc?
This was partially spurned by the sticky post of Bohem et al “Caliber Choices–Comparisons and Applications”, and the post(s) that talked about humane hunting vs. distance and caliber.
I want a long distance rifle and have learned from this site that .308 is no longer the best option. I read the article comparing the .260rem, 6.5*47lapua, and the 6.5creedmor; an excellent article, but it contains no info about the rounds affect on target. As soon as I made up my mind on a 260rem I stumbled across a post on the 284win & 7mm-08…back to square one.
I will be moving to Lake Havasu, AZ ~6months. From the initial recon of the site it looks as though I will be able to shoot at distances limited only by my pocketbook and skill. My primary targets will be; rocks, ground varmints, coyotes, and bigger rocks. Once I have found a great spot I intend to set up a semi-permanent hide and steel as far as the scope can see.
Problem- I want a sniping round that has good effect on target at range. <span style="text-decoration: underline">The potential candidates are .260rem, 284win, and the 7mm-08</span>. I want to use the 223 and 308 to bookend the data to give it some validity (perhaps with the 338lm a bit farther to the right).
My primary considerations for a caliber are; effect on target at range, ability to get/manufacture ammo, recoil, service life of components, cost.
I will purchase the equipment and make my first foray into reloading after I get settled in - this is why I am not inquiring about the bigger calibers. I need something affordable for the first year.
Before we go any further – is there a program that will spit out calculations of energy in ft-lbs based on bullet weight, speed of travel, distance traveled, etc?