• Having trouble logging into HideTV?

    We’ve made updates to HideTV recently and because of this update, you’ll need to login to HideTV again. Check out the thread below for more info or login to HideTV!

    VIEW THREAD LOGIN TO HIDETV

Died Suddenly Documentary World Is Live On Rumble

Flyingbullseye

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Jul 24, 2010
    2,336
    4,917
    45
    Michigan
    Neither was J&J supposedly.....

    That's kind of a yes and no. Its not directly a mRNA vaccine but uses a DNA strand in a very similar method as the other 2. Its not 100% the same but very similar. If you have a auto immune disease that would be the one to really avoid.
     

    earthtrekker1775

    The Prodigal Gun
    Supporter
    Full Member
    Minuteman
    Apr 3, 2009
    1,260
    2,077
    PNW
    I looked into this. This is a paraphrase from him in which he tweeted "do not take the pills they give you, do not take the injections they give you". This is where the anti vaccine guys are no better than the people espousing the vaccine for everybody BS. This is just a snippet to make it sound like he is referring to the vaccine. I would be willing to bet money he was more likely referring to the endless amounts of painkillers and cortisone shots that NFL players are constantly given. I know a guy who played in the NFL for about 5 years. He retired early because of this very reason. I have no doubt the covid shot has side effects, but this isn't the way to lend credibility to it.
    The full quote does no more to prove your suspicion. Why don't you ask him what he meant and get back to us with concrete data. Us "anti-vaccine guys" will wait. I prefer ZELLE, but depending on how much money you are betting I'm sure we can work something out. 😂
     

    CaptNkllm

    Private
    Minuteman
    Jan 23, 2022
    51
    40
    Las Vegas, Nv
    Found this one today and hope it helps anyone who got the shot and is not sure how to purge it out of your system..

    Dr. Peter McCullough On “The Holy Grail Of Covid-19 Vaccine Detoxification”​

     

    CaptNkllm

    Private
    Minuteman
    Jan 23, 2022
    51
    40
    Las Vegas, Nv
    This study looked at the incidence of myocarditis in unvaccinated patients and after COVID infected of unvaccinated patients - none developed myocarditis. This is a critical study for the very reason that the vax-injury deniers are saying the increase in myocarditis/clots and strokes are from COVID infection itself, not the jab. This study proves otherwise.



    Math is a strange thing



    want more just let me know.
     

    theLBC

    Shiftless
    Supporter
    Full Member
    Minuteman
  • Jun 21, 2019
    30,557
    104,664
    qMrbU8Au3XQp.jpeg
     

    sirhrmechanic

    Command Sgt. Major
    Full Member
    Minuteman

    It was illegal into the 1980’s for pharmaceutical companies to do consumer advertising. Only in medical journals and direct to doctors.

    But it was either a Supreme Court case or a lower court ruling in the ‘80s that said government could not infringe on company’s first amendment right to market to consumers. Protected speech.

    So all of a sudden, they are awash with cash because their advertising sells billions of dollars in drugs to consumers who are convinced they need their restless legs numbed and their dry eye healed. And spend freely to get these drugs.

    And now they own the airwaves.

    But can’t stop them advertising.

    You’ll have to hope that their indemnity clauses don’t hold up when they knew vaccines were unsafe and ineffective. And that the executives can get charged with mass murder.

    And we know how likely that is short of a new Bastille Day.
     

    theLBC

    Shiftless
    Supporter
    Full Member
    Minuteman
  • Jun 21, 2019
    30,557
    104,664
    It was illegal into the 1980’s for pharmaceutical companies to do consumer advertising. Only in medical journals and direct to doctors.

    But it was either a Supreme Court case or a lower court ruling in the ‘80s that said government could not infringe on company’s first amendment right to market to consumers. Protected speech.

    So all of a sudden, they are awash with cash because their advertising sells billions of dollars in drugs to consumers who are convinced they need their restless legs numbed and their dry eye healed. And spend freely to get these drugs.

    And now they own the airwaves.

    But can’t stop them advertising.

    You’ll have to hope that their indemnity clauses don’t hold up when they knew vaccines were unsafe and ineffective. And that the executives can get charged with mass murder.

    And we know how likely that is short of a new Bastille Day.
    and little known fact that they use tax dollars to develop many drugs...so we are paying them to brainwash and poison us.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: sirhrmechanic

    sirhrmechanic

    Command Sgt. Major
    Full Member
    Minuteman
    and little known fact that they use tax dollars to develop many drugs...so we are paying them to brainwash and poison us.
    Well, allowing deductions of research and development is a way to innovate in lots of places… so hard to single out pharma on that one.

    Also the feds start the patent 17 year clock ticking when the drug is registered… but can spend 15 years before FDA allows it to be sold… and only after the company funds millions to hundreds of millions… of tests and studies. Leaving the company 2 years to recoup development costs. Start patent after federal approval…

    Anyway, not trying to defend pharma… but they have followed the money and gummint has laid down a trail for them to gobble up.

    IMHO over the past 30 years this trail has been entirely aimed at so thoroughly destroying the medical, pharma and insurance industries, that Americans will scream for their free single payer socialized Bernie Bros medical care.

    Lots of forces at work and few of them give a rats ass about actual people. We’re just statistics and market share.

    Sirhr
     

    Int1968

    Sergeant of the Hide
    Full Member
    Minuteman
    May 8, 2022
    388
    806
    Canada

    One difference between us, north of the border perception drugs cannot be advertised on tv. It won’t fix the issue. I always noticed it when watching American tv. What stood out was the crazy rare side effects of the advertised drugs

    Even universal health care is a scam, if you want choice or quality you have to go to the USA or a private clinic (if it’s allowed), more often than not your fucked.

    USA
    • NHE grew 2.7% to $4.3 trillion in 2021, or $12,914 per person, and accounted for 18.3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
    Canada
    • Total health spending in Canada is expected to reach $331 billion in 2022, or $8,563 per Canadian. It is anticipated that health expenditure will represent 12.2% of Canada’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2022, following a high of 13.8% in 2020.
     

    theLBC

    Shiftless
    Supporter
    Full Member
    Minuteman
  • Jun 21, 2019
    30,557
    104,664
    One difference between us, north of the border perception drugs cannot be advertised on tv. It won’t fix the issue. I always noticed it when watching American tv. What stood out was the crazy rare side effects of the advertised drugs

    Even universal health care is a scam, if you want choice or quality you have to go to the USA or a private clinic (if it’s allowed), more often than not your fucked.

    USA
    • NHE grew 2.7% to $4.3 trillion in 2021, or $12,914 per person, and accounted for 18.3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
    Canada
    • Total health spending in Canada is expected to reach $331 billion in 2022, or $8,563 per Canadian. It is anticipated that health expenditure will represent 12.2% of Canada’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2022, following a high of 13.8% in 2020.
    yeah, when i lived in the UK, everyone that had enough money had vhi or some kind of supplementary insurance to the nhs coverage
     

    theLBC

    Shiftless
    Supporter
    Full Member
    Minuteman
  • Jun 21, 2019
    30,557
    104,664
    Well, allowing deductions of research and development is a way to innovate in lots of places… so hard to single out pharma on that one.

    Also the feds start the patent 17 year clock ticking when the drug is registered… but can spend 15 years before FDA allows it to be sold… and only after the company funds millions to hundreds of millions… of tests and studies. Leaving the company 2 years to recoup development costs. Start patent after federal approval…

    Anyway, not trying to defend pharma… but they have followed the money and gummint has laid down a trail for them to gobble up.

    IMHO over the past 30 years this trail has been entirely aimed at so thoroughly destroying the medical, pharma and insurance industries, that Americans will scream for their free single payer socialized Bernie Bros medical care.

    Lots of forces at work and few of them give a rats ass about actual people. We’re just statistics and market share.

    Sirhr
    what i was thinking of was that they say they have to charge $2000 for a drug to offset development costs when we are paying, not them,
    of course this doesn't apply to every drug from every company...

     
    • Like
    Reactions: sirhrmechanic

    sirhrmechanic

    Command Sgt. Major
    Full Member
    Minuteman
    what i was thinking of was that they say they have to charge $2000 for a drug to offset development costs when we are paying, not them,
    of course this doesn't apply to every drug from every company...
    Remember, deducting r&d costs doesn’t mean the government pays all of it. It just means you aren’t paying taxes (at corporate tax rate) on money used for R&D. Corporate tax rate is about 20 Percent plus some state tax.

    So gummint in not taxing the income that is offset by R&D is paying 20 percent of the costs in reality.

    Of course how many grants do they get? How much of their research comes Out of state and government subsidized academic research projects at universities? So it’s offset more.

    Tax breaks for r&d spending… if applied universally are great innovation drivers. When directed to pet projects or skewing research however, these tax breaks (or grants) can totally screw up economic forces.

    Look at all the money being spent to prove the total lie of climate bs. But that money is skewing all other R&D towards useless feel-good vapor ware or useless ‘technologies’ that set us back versus What the free market could accomplish.

    And when pharma is funded and mobilized in a moment of mass hysteria to inject millions with experimental poisons? Well, that’s not market forces. But is how we got in this died suddenly state of affairs.

    Maybe some lessons will be learned.

    Riggggghhhht.

    Sirhr
     

    theLBC

    Shiftless
    Supporter
    Full Member
    Minuteman
  • Jun 21, 2019
    30,557
    104,664
    Remember, deducting r&d costs doesn’t mean the government pays all of it. It just means you aren’t paying taxes (at corporate tax rate) on money used for R&D. Corporate tax rate is about 20 Percent plus some state tax.

    So gummint in not taxing the income that is offset by R&D is paying 20 percent of the costs in reality.

    Of course how many grants do they get? How much of their research comes Out of state and government subsidized academic research projects at universities? So it’s offset more.

    Tax breaks for r&d spending… if applied universally are great innovation drivers. When directed to pet projects or skewing research however, these tax breaks (or grants) can totally screw up economic forces.

    Look at all the money being spent to prove the total lie of climate bs. But that money is skewing all other R&D towards useless feel-good vapor ware or useless ‘technologies’ that set us back versus What the free market could accomplish.

    And when pharma is funded and mobilized in a moment of mass hysteria to inject millions with experimental poisons? Well, that’s not market forces. But is how we got in this died suddenly state of affairs.

    Maybe some lessons will be learned.

    Riggggghhhht.

    Sirhr
    according to that link, it isn't just tax breaks but grants from the NIH and stuff like that.
    nih gives our taxes out to develop drugs
    then they get kickbacks on royalties...

    Zd25qErsuBOM.jpeg
     
    • Like
    Reactions: gigamortis

    sirhrmechanic

    Command Sgt. Major
    Full Member
    Minuteman
    according to that link, it isn't just tax breaks but grants from the NIH and stuff like that.
    nih gives our taxes out to develop drugs
    then they get kickbacks on royalties...

    Zd25qErsuBOM.jpeg
    Precisely… paying for research with a foregone conclusion… or to develop poison. Or to just do something and damn the side effects…

    Loading the dice in research is not market forces. It is the modern equivalent of the church locking up Galileo for daring to let observations question dogma.

    “We say there is a pandemic, and here is half a billion dollars to support our dogma and push our narrative.”

    That doesn’t advance science. It replaces it with dangerous zealotry and false paths down which pseudo science runs amok.

    All while screaming “trust the science” like good sheep. Not realizing that the whole point of scientific method has always been “question the science”.

    Sirhr
     

    theLBC

    Shiftless
    Supporter
    Full Member
    Minuteman
  • Jun 21, 2019
    30,557
    104,664

    Emerson0311

    Major Hide Member
    Full Member
    Minuteman
    Feb 17, 2018
    1,000
    1,798
    Comox BC
    they purposely trashed the informed consent requirement


    That is not news to us. The people who need to admit, it will deny it as their children die in front of them. I have no grace to offer at this point. Stupid isn’t free.