That's kind of a yes and no. Its not directly a mRNA vaccine but uses a DNA strand in a very similar method as the other 2. Its not 100% the same but very similar. If you have a auto immune disease that would be the one to really avoid.
- Thread starter theLBC
- Start date
That's kind of a yes and no. Its not directly a mRNA vaccine but uses a DNA strand in a very similar method as the other 2. Its not 100% the same but very similar. If you have a auto immune disease that would be the one to really avoid.
The full quote does no more to prove your suspicion. Why don't you ask him what he meant and get back to us with concrete data. Us "anti-vaccine guys" will wait. I prefer ZELLE, but depending on how much money you are betting I'm sure we can work something out. 😂
Found this one today and hope it helps anyone who got the shot and is not sure how to purge it out of your system..
thelibertydaily.com
Dr. Peter McCullough On “The Holy Grail Of Covid-19 Vaccine Detoxification”
Dr. Peter McCullough On “The Holy Grail Of Covid-19 Vaccine Detoxification” ⋆ 🔔 The Liberty Daily
Dr. Peter McCullough has been a voice of reason in a medical system crazed with COVID hysteria. As a leading cardiologist, he worked to educate us all on what – and what isn’t – the science behind COVID and the vaccines. And his warnings about vaccines have been borne out. In a recent article...
thelibertydaily.com 
Now published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature: "The mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous"
In case you missed it. Every health authority in the world should be warning the public about this. The paper was published Sept 21, 2022.
stevekirsch.substack.com 
Contamination with antibiotic/spike-containing expression vectors in the COVID-19 modified mRNA products
The bivalent products were sequenced and the result is not good.
jessicar.substack.com 
Math is a strange thing
GAME OVER: Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your risk of dying
This is why the CDC has NEVER used the Medicare data to prove the vaccines are safe. And this is why NOBODY in mainstream medicine wants you to see this data. EVER. They ALL want it hidden. FOREVER.
stevekirsch.substack.com want more just let me know.
Sam Fox's younger sister Vanessa dies aged just 50
Sam Fox has been left devastated after her younger sister Vanessa died aged just 50 on Saturday.
It was illegal into the 1980’s for pharmaceutical companies to do consumer advertising. Only in medical journals and direct to doctors.
But it was either a Supreme Court case or a lower court ruling in the ‘80s that said government could not infringe on company’s first amendment right to market to consumers. Protected speech.
So all of a sudden, they are awash with cash because their advertising sells billions of dollars in drugs to consumers who are convinced they need their restless legs numbed and their dry eye healed. And spend freely to get these drugs.
And now they own the airwaves.
But can’t stop them advertising.
You’ll have to hope that their indemnity clauses don’t hold up when they knew vaccines were unsafe and ineffective. And that the executives can get charged with mass murder.
And we know how likely that is short of a new Bastille Day.
and little known fact that they use tax dollars to develop many drugs...so we are paying them to brainwash and poison us.
Well, allowing deductions of research and development is a way to innovate in lots of places… so hard to single out pharma on that one.
Also the feds start the patent 17 year clock ticking when the drug is registered… but can spend 15 years before FDA allows it to be sold… and only after the company funds millions to hundreds of millions… of tests and studies. Leaving the company 2 years to recoup development costs. Start patent after federal approval…
Anyway, not trying to defend pharma… but they have followed the money and gummint has laid down a trail for them to gobble up.
IMHO over the past 30 years this trail has been entirely aimed at so thoroughly destroying the medical, pharma and insurance industries, that Americans will scream for their free single payer socialized Bernie Bros medical care.
Lots of forces at work and few of them give a rats ass about actual people. We’re just statistics and market share.
Sirhr
One difference between us, north of the border perception drugs cannot be advertised on tv. It won’t fix the issue. I always noticed it when watching American tv. What stood out was the crazy rare side effects of the advertised drugs
Even universal health care is a scam, if you want choice or quality you have to go to the USA or a private clinic (if it’s allowed), more often than not your fucked.
USA
- NHE grew 2.7% to $4.3 trillion in 2021, or $12,914 per person, and accounted for 18.3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
- Total health spending in Canada is expected to reach $331 billion in 2022, or $8,563 per Canadian. It is anticipated that health expenditure will represent 12.2% of Canada’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2022, following a high of 13.8% in 2020.
yeah, when i lived in the UK, everyone that had enough money had vhi or some kind of supplementary insurance to the nhs coverage
what i was thinking of was that they say they have to charge $2000 for a drug to offset development costs when we are paying, not them,
of course this doesn't apply to every drug from every company...
US Tax Dollars Funded Every New Pharmaceutical in the Last Decade
Amid debates over costs—and profits—from a coronavirus vaccine, a new study shows that taxpayers have been footing the bill for every new drug approved between 2010 and 2019
www.ineteconomics.org
Remember, deducting r&d costs doesn’t mean the government pays all of it. It just means you aren’t paying taxes (at corporate tax rate) on money used for R&D. Corporate tax rate is about 20 Percent plus some state tax.
So gummint in not taxing the income that is offset by R&D is paying 20 percent of the costs in reality.
Of course how many grants do they get? How much of their research comes Out of state and government subsidized academic research projects at universities? So it’s offset more.
Tax breaks for r&d spending… if applied universally are great innovation drivers. When directed to pet projects or skewing research however, these tax breaks (or grants) can totally screw up economic forces.
Look at all the money being spent to prove the total lie of climate bs. But that money is skewing all other R&D towards useless feel-good vapor ware or useless ‘technologies’ that set us back versus What the free market could accomplish.
And when pharma is funded and mobilized in a moment of mass hysteria to inject millions with experimental poisons? Well, that’s not market forces. But is how we got in this died suddenly state of affairs.
Maybe some lessons will be learned.
Riggggghhhht.
Sirhr
according to that link, it isn't just tax breaks but grants from the NIH and stuff like that.
nih gives our taxes out to develop drugs
then they get kickbacks on royalties...
Precisely… paying for research with a foregone conclusion… or to develop poison. Or to just do something and damn the side effects…according to that link, it isn't just tax breaks but grants from the NIH and stuff like that.
nih gives our taxes out to develop drugs
then they get kickbacks on royalties...
Loading the dice in research is not market forces. It is the modern equivalent of the church locking up Galileo for daring to let observations question dogma.
“We say there is a pandemic, and here is half a billion dollars to support our dogma and push our narrative.”
That doesn’t advance science. It replaces it with dangerous zealotry and false paths down which pseudo science runs amok.
All while screaming “trust the science” like good sheep. Not realizing that the whole point of scientific method has always been “question the science”.
Sirhr
Horowitz: German health insurance company experiences 76% increase in employee sick days as excess deaths skyrocket
How ironic that, with the rise of the Fourth Reich, we are witnessing some of the most alarming safety signals of the death jabs in the former home of the Third Reich.There’s a lot of scary news stories these days and numerous current events to keep us up at night. However, can you think of...
www.conservativereview.com So are actual numbers still science, or are they a conspiracy theory now?
Ya, who can know what the cause of these increases in sudden death, right? Bill Gates is killing the kids.
Sudden Increase in Sleep-Related Infant Deaths Alarms Baltimore City and County Officials (VIDEO)
www.thegatewaypundit.com
That is not news to us. The people who need to admit, it will deny it as their children die in front of them. I have no grace to offer at this point. Stupid isn’t free.
Well, it looks like choice has consequences.
Similar threads
