choice 4200 3x9x40 or buckmaster 4.5x14x40
about the same price - money is tight and I cant afford but a weeny bit more and thats pushing it.
going on a RRA Predator Pursuit 16" .223
for my sons first deer rifle and my hunting (varmints) - the problem:
his shots are going to be 100yds or less - mine may be 300...what gives say you? gimme some hints. I have a bushnell 4200 6x24x50 on my .308 savage long-range rifle and a 3x9x40 nikon buckmaster on my sako trg-s .270. I like 'em both but I am worried about the repeatability of the nikon (I havent had a problem - but have read) and the small magnification of the bushnell 4200.
I forgot to mention that this dilemma would not exist if I could have a 10x40 bushnell 3200 on the gun - I have one on my dpms lr-308 and love it- but its not gonna work for the deer hunting game
about the same price - money is tight and I cant afford but a weeny bit more and thats pushing it.
going on a RRA Predator Pursuit 16" .223
for my sons first deer rifle and my hunting (varmints) - the problem:
his shots are going to be 100yds or less - mine may be 300...what gives say you? gimme some hints. I have a bushnell 4200 6x24x50 on my .308 savage long-range rifle and a 3x9x40 nikon buckmaster on my sako trg-s .270. I like 'em both but I am worried about the repeatability of the nikon (I havent had a problem - but have read) and the small magnification of the bushnell 4200.
I forgot to mention that this dilemma would not exist if I could have a 10x40 bushnell 3200 on the gun - I have one on my dpms lr-308 and love it- but its not gonna work for the deer hunting game