Gavin Newsom on Shawn Ryan

Ruff 364

Full Member
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Feb 18, 2017
    386
    436
    Listened to this today on a road trip. What a complete POS this guy is.

    Constantly talks about himself like he's the messiah and nobody, I mean nobody does it better than him and California. He likes the smell of his own farts.

    He's attempting to rebrand himself ahead of the next Presidential election without actually telling you he is going to run. All of a sudden he's against trans people in women's sports, likes fossil fuels, and guns.

    He was gifted a Sig pistol at the start of the show, too bad it wasn't a P320....
     
    Quite a bit of chatter around here today about why Shawn would have him on

    Half see it as some 3d chess to own the libs
    Half see it as Shawn being a pawn of the cabal
    Half just wonder why the gummy bears are always out of fucking stock
    You forgot to add
    Half see it as Shawn ate all the pot gummies.
     
    I've lost all respect for Shawn Ryan for even giving Gavin NewScum air time.
    He did what liberals won't do, have a discussion with the opposition. If you're upset because Shawn Ryan had a discussion with the opposition, then you're no better than the opposition. Do you propose that we silence left leaning voices the same way they did with conservatives in the last decade? If you do, then you can't complain when the pendulum swings the other way in a future election, and they do the same thing all over again.

    Tucker Carlson interviewed the president of Iran. The iranian president was clearly out of his element, and did a piss poor job of explaining away what "they really mean when they say death to America". I'm also making the assumption that the translater was accurate and not re-wording responses. It wasn't about platforming a bad man, it was like showing the emporer has no clothes. Most people have a moderately functioning bullshit meter, and if they listen to someone spouting bullshit, they know it's bullshit, and aren't swayed by it.

    What if the Shawn Ryan show had managed to complete a long form interview with kamala prior to the election much like they did with Trump, would you still have lost respect for him for interviewing her?

    Shawn Ryan basically did the next step of what Joe Rogan was doing. Joe interviewed comedians, fighters, people in the public eye that people would want to know more about. Shawn went one step further, and started talking to people that know the things that the tinfoil hat wearers talk about, then he stepped it up even more. This is why his show is popular, because he was the OG that started doing it. There are a bunch of other lesser known podcasters that have copied the playbook and are trying to do the same thing. The long form podcast is here to stay, and it's going to grow in popularity as people get to get a lot more questions, responses, and insight into people, projects, ideas, and concepts. They hate how the mainstream condenses a 60min interview into a few soundbites that they alone use to alter the perception of the interviewee.

    I just think you're making a mistake to pull admiration and respect for someone because they interviewed someone you didn't like. Just don't listen to it, it's that easy.
     
    He did what liberals won't do, have a discussion with the opposition. If you're upset because Shawn Ryan had a discussion with the opposition, then you're no better than the opposition. Do you propose that we silence left leaning voices the same way they did with conservatives in the last decade? If you do, then you can't complain when the pendulum swings the other way in a future election, and they do the same thing all over again.

    Tucker Carlson interviewed the president of Iran. The iranian president was clearly out of his element, and did a piss poor job of explaining away what "they really mean when they say death to America". I'm also making the assumption that the translater was accurate and not re-wording responses. It wasn't about platforming a bad man, it was like showing the emporer has no clothes. Most people have a moderately functioning bullshit meter, and if they listen to someone spouting bullshit, they know it's bullshit, and aren't swayed by it.

    What if the Shawn Ryan show had managed to complete a long form interview with kamala prior to the election much like they did with Trump, would you still have lost respect for him for interviewing her?

    Shawn Ryan basically did the next step of what Joe Rogan was doing. Joe interviewed comedians, fighters, people in the public eye that people would want to know more about. Shawn went one step further, and started talking to people that know the things that the tinfoil hat wearers talk about, then he stepped it up even more. This is why his show is popular, because he was the OG that started doing it. There are a bunch of other lesser known podcasters that have copied the playbook and are trying to do the same thing. The long form podcast is here to stay, and it's going to grow in popularity as people get to get a lot more questions, responses, and insight into people, projects, ideas, and concepts. They hate how the mainstream condenses a 60min interview into a few soundbites that they alone use to alter the perception of the interviewee.

    I just think you're making a mistake to pull admiration and respect for someone because they interviewed someone you didn't like. Just don't listen to it, it's that easy.
    You hit the nail on the head. Being scared of the other side’s ideas is not the route to success. Dig deep into their heros so everyone can see how idiotic they really are.
     
    He did what liberals won't do, have a discussion with the opposition. If you're upset because Shawn Ryan had a discussion with the opposition, then you're no better than the opposition. Do you propose that we silence left leaning voices the same way they did with conservatives in the last decade? If you do, then you can't complain when the pendulum swings the other way in a future election, and they do the same thing all over again.

    Tucker Carlson interviewed the president of Iran. The iranian president was clearly out of his element, and did a piss poor job of explaining away what "they really mean when they say death to America". I'm also making the assumption that the translater was accurate and not re-wording responses. It wasn't about platforming a bad man, it was like showing the emporer has no clothes. Most people have a moderately functioning bullshit meter, and if they listen to someone spouting bullshit, they know it's bullshit, and aren't swayed by it.

    What if the Shawn Ryan show had managed to complete a long form interview with kamala prior to the election much like they did with Trump, would you still have lost respect for him for interviewing her?

    Shawn Ryan basically did the next step of what Joe Rogan was doing. Joe interviewed comedians, fighters, people in the public eye that people would want to know more about. Shawn went one step further, and started talking to people that know the things that the tinfoil hat wearers talk about, then he stepped it up even more. This is why his show is popular, because he was the OG that started doing it. There are a bunch of other lesser known podcasters that have copied the playbook and are trying to do the same thing. The long form podcast is here to stay, and it's going to grow in popularity as people get to get a lot more questions, responses, and insight into people, projects, ideas, and concepts. They hate how the mainstream condenses a 60min interview into a few soundbites that they alone use to alter the perception of the interviewee.

    I just think you're making a mistake to pull admiration and respect for someone because they interviewed someone you didn't like. Just don't listen to it, it's that easy.
    100%!

    Also, well done Jason for gifting him the P365. That was hilarious, well played…
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Short-bus and XP1K
    You hit the nail on the head. Being scared of the other side’s ideas is not the route to success. Dig deep into their heros so everyone can see how idiotic they really are.
    He had newscum on cause he got paid. If you think having the opposition on will some how change minds I've got a bridge to sell you. Since you listened to it what did you learn that you didn't already know.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: LuckyLuke80