Re: New Product! By Snipers for Snipers!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cordoba</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi. I've been perusing this site for awhile and have found a ton of useful information.
This FDAC looks like the shizzle-dang-zang. You guys had me at Smaller, Cheaper, Lighter, and more Reliable than anything battery operated. I was wondering if you have any plans of making it so that each unit is independently dedicated to MILS or MOA with a corresponding slide rule on the reverse side indicating more information pertinent to the final firing correction (i.e. lead for a moving target based on TOF for that DA as well as angular corrections)? Would that be a feasible option for future models or am I overly wishful?
</div></div>
Don't you hate it when somebody posts something (like your post) and then you slap your forehead and think to yourself "why didn't I think of that!". Excellent idea!
Only downside I see on that is having to carry more SKU's to fill each customers needs, and thus decreased order quantities of any single individual SKU. That leads to a slightly higher cost of manufacturing, depending on the relationship between vendor, and manufacture of course. Either way, I still think it's a great idea. Even if the back side just had a simple chart with the corresponding angles and cosine figures.
Branden
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cordoba</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi. I've been perusing this site for awhile and have found a ton of useful information.
This FDAC looks like the shizzle-dang-zang. You guys had me at Smaller, Cheaper, Lighter, and more Reliable than anything battery operated. I was wondering if you have any plans of making it so that each unit is independently dedicated to MILS or MOA with a corresponding slide rule on the reverse side indicating more information pertinent to the final firing correction (i.e. lead for a moving target based on TOF for that DA as well as angular corrections)? Would that be a feasible option for future models or am I overly wishful?
</div></div>
Don't you hate it when somebody posts something (like your post) and then you slap your forehead and think to yourself "why didn't I think of that!". Excellent idea!
Only downside I see on that is having to carry more SKU's to fill each customers needs, and thus decreased order quantities of any single individual SKU. That leads to a slightly higher cost of manufacturing, depending on the relationship between vendor, and manufacture of course. Either way, I still think it's a great idea. Even if the back side just had a simple chart with the corresponding angles and cosine figures.
Branden