OCW workup today. I've shot the 250 gr Berger hybrids before after a quick load workup, and thought I'd revisit them today.
This was out of a 338 Lapua Magnum TRG-42 with 1x12" twist.
New Lapua brass, Redding neck sizer only with a 365 bushing. Fed large rifle magnum match primers. Retumbo powder.
Berger's web site lists 86.5 as minimum charge and 94.0 as maximum for Retumbo, so per the instructions on Dan Newberry's web page I settled on 86.5, 88.2, and 89.9 gr for the first three rounds, then 3 each of 91.8, 92.4, 93.1, 93.7, and 94.4
Went to the range and shot the first 3, then the remaining 15 round-robin, from a rest through a chrono to a 100 yard target.
Load data:
OCW math:
OCW graph showing average point of impact relative to aim point:
I know group size is not the point of an OCW workup, but I was still really disappointed with the >>1 MOA groups (except the 93.7 gr group). I didn't feel like I had any fliers. Low wind. After this, I shot 5 rounds of 250 gr Lapua Scenars into a .64" group.
What do you experts make of this? What's next? Thanks.
This was out of a 338 Lapua Magnum TRG-42 with 1x12" twist.
New Lapua brass, Redding neck sizer only with a 365 bushing. Fed large rifle magnum match primers. Retumbo powder.
Berger's web site lists 86.5 as minimum charge and 94.0 as maximum for Retumbo, so per the instructions on Dan Newberry's web page I settled on 86.5, 88.2, and 89.9 gr for the first three rounds, then 3 each of 91.8, 92.4, 93.1, 93.7, and 94.4
Went to the range and shot the first 3, then the remaining 15 round-robin, from a rest through a chrono to a 100 yard target.


Load data:
Code:
Case Info Bullet OAL Primer Powder V1 V2 V3 Avg SD ES
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 86.5 2503 2,503.0 0
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 88.2 2584 2,584.0 0
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 89.9 2671 2,671.0 0
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 91.8 2763 2754 2773 2,763.3 9.5 19
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 92.4 2785 2790 2786 2,787.0 2.6 5
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 93.1 2819 2810 2812 2,813.7 4.7 9
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 93.7 2843 2836 2848 2,842.3 6.0 12
0x Lapua 2.720” 250 Berger hybrid 3.681” Fed215M Retumbo 94.4 2862 2861 2854 2,859.0 4.4 8
OCW math:
Code:
--shot1-- --shot2-- --shot3--
x1 y1 x2 y2 x3 y3 x-avg y-avg Grp Size
91.8 gr 0.26 0.09 -0.92 -0.51 -1.26 -0.50 -0.64 -0.30 1.64"
92.4 0.00 0.00 0.15 -0.50 -0.99 0.18 -0.28 -0.10 1.31"
93.1 0.04 -0.17 0.51 -0.66 1.50 0.01 0.68 -0.27 1.46"
93.7 0.52 0.23 0.41 -0.11 0.73 -0.42 0.55 -0.10 0.67"
94.4 -0.34 -0.15 -0.18 0.21 0.82 0.56 0.10 0.20 1.36"
OCW graph showing average point of impact relative to aim point:

I know group size is not the point of an OCW workup, but I was still really disappointed with the >>1 MOA groups (except the 93.7 gr group). I didn't feel like I had any fliers. Low wind. After this, I shot 5 rounds of 250 gr Lapua Scenars into a .64" group.
What do you experts make of this? What's next? Thanks.