• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Older Jeep,Toyota ,4x4 ect for a hunting/mountain beater truck

Rthur

Philomath
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Apr 16, 2010
    15,760
    28,367
    56
    Not Chicago, Illinios
    Have a bud looking for the above.
    Tired of beating the piss outa his new/newer 2500 duramax.
    I know guys on here have worked on/used most everything available.
    Budget is 4-5k.
    Lets hear your thoughts on this specific goal.

    R
     
    You should be able to find a decent TJ (98-2004? Wrangler) for that. Look for the 4.0 motor. Not much to do after that. Weld up the rear diff and cut the fender wells to get the biggest tire you can get in there. Add a winch and you're gtg.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Rthur
    Best $2600 I ever spent!!!
    8FB712CA-4ADB-4A96-8209-7B6170866A23.jpeg
    666F5E8D-A561-4969-B8D4-38341DDDCA0E.jpeg
    D2148DD6-633B-4E75-8D70-7E97F4D7A990.png
    5F035994-7315-494B-9DA4-0166C79AEF00.jpeg
     
    Jeeps hold their value well, and the cheap ones are cheap for a reason. Watch out for salvage titles and other damage if found at that low of a price, definitely check the Carfax.

    There's the occasional cherry out there from someone looking to unload it, but very rare. Same goes for anything Toyota 4WD, typically at top level or outside that budget and if you do find one in it, the likelihood it would need a lot of work is high as well. Private seller is the best, watch eBay, Craigslist, Autotrader, etc for good deals.

    On a budget for just a beater, 2nd gen Explorer with the 302 V-8 is my recommendation. You can find one for $2k range and beat on it without a care. They take 31"s with no mods, can self install a lunchbox locker for under $300 each axle for traction galore, live axle up front is tough as shit. It's basically F-150 guts on a smaller frame. Shorter two door sport with the 4.0 OHV is great too, I have one, never failed me in the mud or climbing old logging trails in four low, even with my open diffs. Cost to own is lower than Jeep too for insurance and property taxes, they're a dime a dozen, just don't have the cool factor.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Rthur
    Call every body shop you know. Find a roll over Cheap. Cut the roof off ad a roll bar and you are good to go. Likely to find a newer model for pennies on dollar.
     
    Fourth generation[edit]
    Truck Six Overview Production 1964 - 1996Layout Displacement 240 cu in (3.9 L)
    300 cu in (4.9 L)Cylinder bore 4"Piston stroke 3.18" (240)
    3.98" (300)Combustion Fuel system
    Output Power output 114 hp (85 kW) - 150 hp (112 kW)Torqueoutput 260 lb⋅ft (353 N⋅m)

    Produced at the Cleveland Engine plant in Brook Park, Ohio from 1964 through 1996, the 240 and 300 Sixes are well known for their durability. Simple design and rugged construction continue to endear these engines to a number of Ford enthusiasts to this day. The engine has earned the monikers "bulletproof" and "indestructible" by many. Popular legend holds that are numerous claims by owners who have purposely sought to destroy a Ford straight-six through intentionally abusive use, but who were unsuccessful in doing so.
    One example of the engine's sturdy design is the fact that no timing chain or timing belt (both of which can break, causing unwanted downtime or even engine damage...although this is extremely unlikely in the case of a chain) is used. This generation of Ford Six was designed with long-wearing gears for that purpose instead. Very few modern engines use timing gears; belts and chains are by far more common. This is because engine makers long ago (in the 1930s) discovered that gear-driven camshafts are more expensive to build, heavier, sap more power out of an engine from, and transmit harmful shock impulses. Belts are easily replaced at intervals, and chains will generally last as long as the engine will. Also these engines employed 7 main bearings, which is far more than is necessary at the power level.
    Both the 240 and the 300, no matter the application, used a single barrel Autolite 1100/1101 (or Carter YF/A) carburetor until the introduction of electronic fuel injection in 1987. With proper gearing, many F-trucks and Broncos achieve 20+mpg. This fact was heavily used by Ford's advertising campaign (some television advertisements and written literature even claimed 30 mpg), since the V8 engines in these trucks rarely achieved over 14 mpg.
    The fuel economy of the 300 makes the engine a popular choice among truck enthusiasts that want both power and economy. The addition of performance parts (such as intake and exhaust manifolds with a four-barrel carburetor) place the engine power output near the same levels as the stock 'HO' ('High Output') version of the optional 351 V8, with little or no change in economy.
     
    Had a '95 F-150 4x2 with the straight six. The engine ran great, the manual Mazda M5OD tranny, not so much. Went through two slave cylinders and clutch sets before it hit 100k, and no, I'm not shitty on a clutch. Not sure if they used that transmission on the 4WD version, but certainly avoid it.
     
    I use my newer JK's (2013/2017 rubicons) a prairie dog rig. I used a side by side utv last week and loved it. We also took a quad. Mounted tables on both. Unlike a jeep or truck, a side-by-side or quad is hard to get stuck. Downside, it usually requires a trailer (3300 mil round trip for us). Better visibility and smaller profile than my rubicon. Driven offroad for almost 30 years, it was nice taking something smaller with better visibility.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bender