PortaJohn

For members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, the church's General Handbook covers what is and is not allowed in many situations. Bishop may change but not likely. I don't like it and may not follow that specific one at times. Maybe.

35.5.7.2
Firearms and Weapons Firearms and other lethal weapons are not allowed on Church property. This includes concealed weapons. This does not apply to current law enforcement officers.
Just need permission from bishop.
 
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
1759589858416.png
 
Just need permission from bishop.
Nope. Not hating on LDS at all but any religious organization or other totally optional “authority figure” in my life needs to take a step back. I am my own man and make my own decisions. I will abide by laws, but permission from another adult is a complete no go, undershepherd or not. I answer to God, and as an adult I have certain responsibilities to those around me. Men need to be men, and they need to carry in church these days and to fulfill their responsibilities as protectors of their family. If this last year hasn’t brought that out I don’t know what will.
 
Last edited:

Shit, I've been keeping track of my BP for a couple months now. 110/70 is high for me. I have a pill to take when it dips below 100. Last time I took one, it went up to 120 from 95 in a 1/2 hour. 1/2 hour later, it was back down to 110.

Lowest I've recorded was 75/57. 😐
 
i'm shocked


And yet the full extent of sexual misconduct at the CIA remains a classified secret in the name of national security, including a recent 648-page internal watchdog report that found systemic shortcomings in the agency’s handling of such complaints.

“The classified nature of the activities allowed the agency to hide a lot of things,” said Liza Mundy, author of “Sisterhood: The Secret History of Women at the CIA.” The male-dominated agency, she said, has long been a refuge for egregious sexual misconduct. “For decades, men at the top had free rein.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r
Shit, I've been keeping track of my BP for a couple months now. 110/70 is high for me. I have a pill to take when it dips below 100. Last time I took one, it went up to 120 from 95 in a 1/2 hour. 1/2 hour later, it was back down to 110.

Lowest I've recorded was 75/57. 😐
maybe you should eat more bacon.
 
Nope. Not hating on LDS at all but any religious organization or other totally optional “authority figure” in my life needs to take a step back. I am my own man and make my own decisions. I will abide by laws, but permission from another adult is a complete no go, undershepherd or not. I answer to God, and as an adult I have certain responsibilities to those around me. Men need to be men, and they need to carry in church these days and to fulfill their responsibilities as protectors of their family. If this last year hasn’t brought that out I don’t know what will.
I completely agree, I was just telling you how the church is. I didn’t always carry a church, but I’m going to now with or without permission lol
 
Pretty sure SC rules it's 1st amendment protected activity. May be able to get them for starting a fire in public under a city ordinance.
SC is safe, given this is yet another unconstitutional EO encroaching on our freedoms that isn't worth the paper its written on; however, if Congress were to enact similar legislation (it won't, because it's unconstitutional), states would have issues (Supremacy Clause).

This is why we can't have nice things, like fixing the justice system and mass deportations.


Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)​

Primary Holding
The First Amendment protections on symbolic speech prevent states from banning desecrations of the American flag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoDopes