PortaJohn

#2,251
Choid said:
It is literally defined as a disorder in the DSM V. Not sure why this is controversial.
Click to expand...

I'm gonna jump in here and say, have you looked at how large the DSM has grown to be?

They literally have made up a disorder for fucking everything.

No disorder?
No treatment.
No treatment? No $$$$$.

Disorder? Yes.
Yes = treatment.
Treatment = $$$$$$$$

That's how simple the DSM-V is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote, camocorvette and 308pirate
#2,252
Mike Casselton said:
I'm gonna jump in here and say, have you looked at how large the DSM has grown to be?

They literally have made up a disorder for fucking everything.

No disorder?
No treatment.
No treatment? No $$$$$.

Disorder? Yes.
Yes = treatment.
Treatment = $$$$$$$$

That's how simple the DSM-V is.
Click to expand...
That's actually not necessarily true. What you are saying is true for a diagnosis, but not a disorder. For example, transgenderism used to be classified as a disorder, which it is, but was reclassified as a dysphoria. Being a dysphoria allows for $$$$$$$ for treatment without the "stigma" of having a disorder. Likewise, dislexia is considered a disability, and can get $$$$$, but is not a disorder.

Sociopathy, psychopathy etc are disorders, as is pedophilia. It isn't a euphemism, just a categorization.

In any case, I was simply trying to use the correct word. Molesting is a crime, pedophilia is a disorder. Most pedophiles, apparently, are able to constrain themselves. Or so the research says. Whatever the case, if anybody took any of my statements to be a defense of pedophilia, then I apologize. They were not.
 
#2,253
The King said:
So - on todays $1.9T stimulus -

It was exactly equivalent to taking $8610.20 from every person that actually pays taxes in the US.

At gunpoint - never forget that part. So you just worked 14 weeks for everyone else if you make the average US income.
Click to expand...

That assumes 220 million taxpayers. I doubt that the number of people who are actually paying the freight in this country exceeds 150 or 160 million. By paying the freight, I mean net. Not EIC filers or other net leaches after bennies are deducted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bourbon_and_Bullets
#2,254
Howland said:
That assumes 220 million taxpayers. I doubt that the number of people who are actually paying the freight in this country exceeds 150 or 160 million. By paying the freight, I mean net. Not EIC filers or other net leaches after bennies are deducted.
Click to expand...
Net it is way lower than that, I imagine. Probably no more than 20%. Maybe less.
 
#2,255
Choid said:
That's actually not necessarily true. What you are saying is true for a diagnosis, but not a disorder. For example, transgenderism used to be classified as a disorder, which it is, but was reclassified as a dysphoria. Being a dysphoria allows for $$$$$$$ for treatment without the "stigma" of having a disorder. Likewise, dislexia is considered a disability, and can get $$$$$, but is not a disorder.

Sociopathy, psychopathy etc are disorders, as is pedophilia. It isn't a euphemism, just a categorization.

In any case, I was simply trying to use the correct word. Molesting is a crime, pedophilia is a disorder. Most pedophiles, apparently, are able to constrain themselves. Or so the research says. Whatever the case, if anybody took any of my statements to be a defense of pedophilia, then I apologize. They were not.
Click to expand...
whatcha think about little girls in "beauty pageants" and people that watch them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn and Sandhog308
#2,256
SKFg5xtq.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: HD1911, HMRamateur, pmclaine and 4 others
#2,258
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: HD1911, 10ring'r, Sandhog308 and 2 others
#2,259
theLBC said:
whatcha think about little girls in "beauty pageants" and people that watch them?
Click to expand...
I think they are fucking weirdos, though I can't say I have had the displeasure of actually meeting a person like that.

If you are asking me if I think they are pedophiles, I have no idea. It is a subculture I know nothing about. It surely wouldn't surprise me, though I have always thought of it more as a group of women trying to grab on to some fantasy of a youth they never enjoyed themselves.
 
Last edited:
#2,261
6.5SH said:
Think the people that put their kids into that are some variation of Münchhausen by proxy, not excusing it but definitely something wrong there.
Click to expand...
i can't say all of them, but i watched a show that i could only interpret as a mom exploiting her daughter and pimping her out. they don't pose like kids and they don't wear kid clothes. they dress them up like call girls.
i can see how this could be seen as the mother enjoying her daughter's attention by proxy. the mothers are rarely beautiful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandhog308 and 308pirate
#2,262
Doc68 said:
I watched the first two...
What a sick bastard. He was groping the girl in the red dress. Kept his hand on her side and was moving his fingers the whole time.
Click to expand...

Look at 4:25, he covers her whole breast with the right hand - the poor girl cringed..He often would put his hand on the right upper arm so he could try to touch their side breast - if you slow it down and go to full screen you can see his fingers moving pressing down or in (ie. at 6:09). The girl Jess, that didn't pull away, got her own photo while her father said "Dad is going to stay pretty close"; 7:45 - same things with another girl, 9:06-9:10 he's touching half her upper right breast and even upper on the left, the girl in gray @ 11:23 actually catches on to his trick and keeps moving her right arm farther and farther away from her chest..
He did the same thing to this adult female, although the other woman complained about the kiss

and the protective grandfather move by Sessions:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r and Sandhog308
#2,263
UKDslayer said:

Look at 4:25, he covers her whole breast with the right hand - the poor girl cringed..He often would put his hand on the right upper arm so he could try to touch their side breast - if you slow it down and go to full screen you can see his fingers moving pressing down or in (ie. at 6:09). The girl Jess, that didn't pull away, got her own photo while her father said "Dad is going to stay pretty close"; 7:45 - same things with another girl, 9:06-9:10 he's touching half her upper right breast and even upper on the left, the girl in gray @ 11:23 actually catches on to his trick and keeps moving her right arm farther and farther away from her chest..
He did the same thing to this adult female, although she complained about the kiss

and the protective grandfather move by Sessions:
Click to expand...

Sorry I cant watch that shit. My step daughter was raped by her biological father when she was 9. Then he tried to drown her afterwards.

Doc
 
  • Angry
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: AMGtuned, Forgetful Coyote, HD1911 and 5 others
#2,265
I couldn't help but wonder if there's a way to get a close up of the scope.
Anyone know which one it is?
Fuck the pansies and their fears.
E. Bryant said:


Gotta admit, this might not be the best representation for responsible gun ownership and use :unsure: (I believe she's a mother of four kids)
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote, HD1911, Blutroop and 3 others
#2,266
E. Bryant said:


Gotta admit, this might not be the best representation for responsible gun ownership and use :unsure: (I believe she's a mother of four kids)
Click to expand...


How many times do we have to repeat that appeasing the fucking leftists gains us NOTHING. They don't give a shit how we store our guns, they will ALWAYS find something wrong with it.

In any case, you neither know nor are qualified to judge Boebert's home situation and firearm storage security.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote, Keel Haul, HD1911 and 7 others
#2,269
308pirate said:
How many times do we have to repeat that appeasing the fucking leftists gains us NOTHING. They don't give a shit how we store our guns, they will ALWAYS find something wrong with it.

In any case, you neither know nor are qualified to judge Boebert's home situation and firearm storage security.
Click to expand...

Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Choid
#2,270
Doc68 said:
Hes got 34 years left. I got thrown out of the trial for losing my shit. He will be 78 when he gets out. No parole chance either.

Doc
Click to expand...
One of the reasons I somewhat believe the narrative that tons of the people at the top of the food chain are sexual predators is the stories women tell me at work. (I work in a place where these types of stories are going to get told due to the role I am in).

Their stories either star a man who is a loner and didn’t get out much - or it’s the powerful family patriarch. Or drugs/alchohol. Or two of the above.

People that fancy themselves patriarchs are a key source of political ambition and/or corporate leadership.
 
#2,272
E. Bryant said:
Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.
Click to expand...

Let's just assume for a second that you know her motivations for putting those rifles and pistols on the shelf behind her. So the fuck what? It's her home to do as she pleases and not your home to dictate what's right or wrong.

The second sentence in your post above is truly the height of irony.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote, Bbob, Keel Haul and 5 others
#2,273
E. Bryant said:
That seems like too short of a sentence :mad:
Click to expand...
He got 45 years total. Nowhere even close to being enough. This was after I spent almost 80k in lawyers trying to get custody of the children. We think he also tried to drown my youngest because he was afraid of the bathtub for so long he would not take baths and my wife had to be in there to shower him, but we could never prove anything.

Doc
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote
#2,274
The room itself could be secure. Heavy steel door, or a vault door or just locking etc.

Or, perhaps they are simply put up in the safe each day.

Hardly know the circumstances, but by all means...call it out lol.
 
#2,276
E. Bryant said:
Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.
Click to expand...


I remember when "our community" used to display firearms in glass front beautiful furniture as a source of pride in the home.

Now we hide them in blocks of steel in shame.

Granted I understand the safety issue but the question should be......How did we survive than without people breaking in to our houses and stealing our shit or how come we didnt worry about every depressed person coming along and wanting to use our shit to kill themselves?

Sounds like we got a society problem not a gun problem.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 91Eunozs, Forgetful Coyote, MtnCreek and 25 others
#2,277
E. Bryant said:
Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.

Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.
Click to expand...
It's not bullshit. It's her right. We are past the point of appeasing the communist tools. Double down on stupidity? Really? We are past the point of no return. We are not going to win them over. If it "Triggers" the left them so be it. They need it shoved up their asses on a daily basis.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote, atomic41, JBELL74 and 10 others
#2,279
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
#2,281
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
#2,283
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: HD1911, 10ring'r and Doc68
#2,285
pmclaine said:
I remember when "our community" used to display firearms in glass front beautiful furniture as a source of pride in the home.

Now we hide them in blocks of steel in shame.

Granted I understand the safety issue but the question should be......How did we survive than without people breaking in to our houses and stealing our shit or how come we didnt worry about every depressed person coming along and wanting to use our shit to kill themselves?

Sounds like we got a society problem not a gun problem.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
#2,288
I'm fine with displaying either. All I am saying is that having a Warhol piece displayed is not the same thing as supporting Mao or communism. They are pieces of art, not political statements.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Keel Haul
#2,294
Choid said:
I'm fine with displaying either. All I am saying is that having a Warhol piece displayed is not the same thing as supporting Mao or communism. They are pieces of art, not political statements.
Click to expand...
NOTHING means nothing. Everything you see, means something. The fact that you don't see it isn't a character flaws at all. You can't help it that you are blind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ravenworks and 308pirate
#2,296
I don't know what to tell you guys. If you have Warhol Cambell's Soup cans up, it doesn't mean that you like Campbell's Soup. If you have his electric chair silkscreens up, it doesn't mean you like the death penalty. Same with his work with guns in it. Doesn't mean you are pro gun. Art isn't always about the subject of the piece, it is often much deeper than that. I realize that I, apparently, have run in different circles from you all in my life, so I am not surprised to see people think that having a Warhol Mao makes you a commie on here.
 
#2,298
Choid said:
I don't know what to tell you guys. If you have Warhol Cambell's Soup cans up, it doesn't mean that you like Campbell's Soup. If you have his electric chair silkscreens up, it doesn't mean you like the death penalty. Same with his work with guns in it. Doesn't mean you are pro gun. Art isn't always about the subject of the piece, it is often much deeper than that. I realize that I, apparently, have run in different circles from you all in my life, so I am not surprised to see people think that having a Warhol Mao makes you a commie on here.
Click to expand...

I have a confederate battle flag hanging in my living room. Is that art?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote, Ravenworks, Flintdog2011 and 3 others
#2,300
pmclaine said:
I remember when "our community" used to display firearms in glass front beautiful furniture as a source of pride in the home.

Now we hide them in blocks of steel in shame.

Granted I understand the safety issue but the question should be......How did we survive than without people breaking in to our houses and stealing our shit or how come we didnt worry about every depressed person coming along and wanting to use our shit to kill themselves?

Sounds like we got a society problem not a gun problem.
Click to expand...
I remember times when they hung in pickup window racks in school parking lots.
Never any stolen and never any school shootings.

R
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forgetful Coyote, Shanghai McCoy, JBELL74 and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

alexj-12
Introducing Quick Shot Challenges
Replies
0
Views
3K
alexj-12
alexj-12
Lowlight
Call to Action : Scout Sniper Heritage Foundation
Replies
1
Views
290
Redmanss
Redmanss
LuckyDuck
Quick question for the "watch guys" on the Hide here...
Replies
21
Views
1K
Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
K
  • Locked
Firearms Nope
Replies
1
Views
1K
kriller134
K
Lowlight
Some to think about ....
Replies
55
Views
4K
UKDslayer
U
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts