I saw the first version of this machine at MIllett factory many years ago (ten or so, I think). I do not know what kinds of improvements they have made since then. Jim was extremely protective of how exactly they did the testing back then, so he did not let me poke inside it a whole lot. Hence, I can not tell you exactly if it is worthwhile.
That having been said, Jim is definitely a good mechanical engineer. I can not quite ascertain how well he understands optics and imaging though.
The company I work for makes all sorts of optical test systems for targeting payloads, thermal riflescopes, cameras, etc. Simply looking at the way the system is contracted from the outside is mostly reasonable.
To be able to tell you if his test results are accurate, I would need to know a little more about the algorithms he uses.
That having been said, when I visited them those years ago, I brought a couple of decent scopes with me and according to their machine, Millett TRS was better than both of them. I took that TRS home with me and set it up on a collimator at work. My test results were a bit different, although those first gen TRS scopes were surprisingly decent for the time. Then they went into full production and QC took a dive.
ILya