Rifle Scopes Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

Re: Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

I work with tenths of a foot every day...does that make feet metric?

Angular measurements are not metric or imperial...they are all based off of how many sections a circle can be broken into.

A radian is no more metric than a radius. A radius can be givven in either feet or meters, but the term is not defined by any one system.

The only system that a radian can be catagorized to is mathmatics...it it a function of a circle, not a set measurement against a given standard.
 
Re: Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Turk</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Lot more to the metric system then just what is mentioned above. Please read the part about "decimal multiples here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_system , and after that if you feel that attaching a metric prefix has absolutely nothing to w/ it being part metric; so be it.
</div></div>

You should have read the article before linking to it. And possibly the main article for SI prefixes that is referenced by that article since, after all, SI prefixes are a completely separate entity from (though extensively utilized by) the metric system. To summarize: All kippers are fish, but not all fish are kippers. All cars use tires, but not all that use tires are cars.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Turk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Btw thanks for your clarification on the metric ton!
smirk.gif
</div></div>

Glad I could help.
 
Re: Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

You guys make this way too complicated. The OP is correct - a CM is a CM, no matter how far you are away from it. It is still a CM. It's just harder to see because it gets smaller as you get further away from it, no matter if you walk away in feet, yards, or meters.

I like its simplicity.
 
Re: Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ratbert</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Turk</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Lot more to the metric system then just what is mentioned above. Please read the part about "decimal multiples here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_system , and after that if you feel that attaching a metric prefix has absolutely nothing to w/ it being part metric; so be it.
</div></div>

You should have read the article before linking to it. And possibly the main article for SI prefixes that is referenced by that article since, after all, SI prefixes are a completely separate entity from (though extensively utilized by) the metric system. To summarize: All kippers are fish, but not all fish are kippers. All cars use tires, but not all that use tires are cars.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Turk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Btw thanks for your clarification on the metric ton!
smirk.gif
</div></div>

Glad I could help. </div></div>
I like your selective use of transitive properties!
 
Re: Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gugubica</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I work with tenths of a foot every day...does that make feet metric?

</div></div>

Carpenters and whores work in inches...
grin.gif




I can't believe this is up for discussion, again.
 
Re: Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You guys could over complicate and ruin a blow job left to your own devices.

Just sayin. </div></div>

AMEN!
 
Re: Pros & Cons of Going totally metric

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You guys could over complicate and ruin a blow job left to your own devices.

Just sayin. </div></div>

Yet another great sig line being born...