- Thread starter Maggot
- Start date
Last edited:
tampa bay times has a good article in it this morn about this jagoff...the last sentence says it all
i believe they may prosecute
i believe they may prosecute
I hope so.
go dig it up. homeboy is a super dick and regardless of his situation, i think his past is going to take a shit on him
If the prosecution goes down that road, it opens the same road to the defense.
I guaran-damn-tee you that the guy who got shot has a record of violent behavior.
read the article, they are prolly going to go after him w the he WASNT afraid for his life
regardless of this assholes outcome, i still think it was a good shoot
regardless of this assholes outcome, i still think it was a good shoot
Only if he has a shit attorney
Aboslutely untrue.
The reason he "got off" was overwhelming evidence that he was attacked, was in a position of disadvantage with Martin in the mount, bashing Zimmerman's head on the concrete.
This was corroborated by physical evidence, scientific forensic analysis and eye witness statements.
This guy sounds more and more like NOT the kind of person you want to hold up as a role model for your right to carry and protect yourself.
I guess in FL they let people get away with all kinds of threatening behaviour and purposely causing accidents to injure women and & children. I'm pretty sure in TX with a list of police contacts similar he would not have been still carrying, or would have gotten what he deserved long before.
What's on his rap sheet?
THis certainly says a lot about his character. I think they will indite him and likely convict him of something. Too many strikes and youre out.
"The Times found that Drejka, who shot and killed McGlockton during a fight over a parking space, has been the accused aggressor in four prior incidents since 2012.
Three were documented in police reports, all involving road rage. Witnesses accused him of flashing a gun in two cases. In the third, a state trooper cited Drejka after he braked in front of a woman driving with two children.
In a fourth incident, not reported to police at the time, a man who had parked in the same handicap-reserved parking space McGlockton’s girlfriend had parked in July 19 said Drejka confronted and eventually threatened to kill him."
----------------------
Since 2012, according to records and interviews, 47-year-old Michael Drejka has been the accused aggressor in four incidents. Investigators documented three cases in police reports.
The other was not shared with authorities at the time but involved the same handicap-reserved parking spot outside the Circle A Food Store near Clearwater and another shooting threat.
Two involved allegations of Drejka showing a gun. In another, a trooper accused him of aggressive driving and cited him after a crash when Drejka braked hard in front of a woman driving with two children.
"The Times found that Drejka, who shot and killed McGlockton during a fight over a parking space, has been the accused aggressor in four prior incidents since 2012.
Three were documented in police reports, all involving road rage. Witnesses accused him of flashing a gun in two cases. In the third, a state trooper cited Drejka after he braked in front of a woman driving with two children.
In a fourth incident, not reported to police at the time, a man who had parked in the same handicap-reserved parking space McGlockton’s girlfriend had parked in July 19 said Drejka confronted and eventually threatened to kill him."
----------------------
Since 2012, according to records and interviews, 47-year-old Michael Drejka has been the accused aggressor in four incidents. Investigators documented three cases in police reports.
The other was not shared with authorities at the time but involved the same handicap-reserved parking spot outside the Circle A Food Store near Clearwater and another shooting threat.
Two involved allegations of Drejka showing a gun. In another, a trooper accused him of aggressive driving and cited him after a crash when Drejka braked hard in front of a woman driving with two children.
Other than the traffic violation it appears to be all accusations (I didn't see any mention of convictions). If a defense attorney can keep prior convictions out of court, I can't imagine accusations getting in...but who knows? The justice system seems to bend with the wind.
They can use anything they know of his past to impeach him once hes on the stand, so, all of that could potentially get in.
If he gets on the stand.
is there a term limits for prosecution on the prior road rages w gun... they said nobody wanted to prosecute on two of them, maybe they will now, if not termed out
I was a juror in a felony drug case and they didn't let us know of the decade of crime
The defendant had, I think that comes in sentencing only.
The guy was so dirty he got convicted even though half the jurors had libtard tendancies
The defendant had, I think that comes in sentencing only.
The guy was so dirty he got convicted even though half the jurors had libtard tendancies
Not surprisingly, politics has entered into the equation: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/1...ur-ground-case-arrested-for-manslaughter.html
As I stated in my first post, there's consequences for your actions. His asshatery came to light and now he's answering for it. He's quite the bully himself. I do believe he'll be exonerated of manslaughter, and rightfully so. He'll also be on everyone's RADAR for awhile and hopefully he'll reel in his quest to harass citizens into compliance.
And if McGlockton would had just called Drejka's mother a whore, we'd probably not be talking about this and Drejka could be harassing someone else about parking in a handicapped spot or brandishing his gun in a fit of road rage and get shot himself. Consequences. Actions have them.
And if McGlockton would had just called Drejka's mother a whore, we'd probably not be talking about this and Drejka could be harassing someone else about parking in a handicapped spot or brandishing his gun in a fit of road rage and get shot himself. Consequences. Actions have them.
