After loads of questions and statements around the whole issue about scope levelling I made this little chart.
This is NOT a discussion if bubble levels are needed or expensive instruments when setting up your scope.
It's absolutely not a discussion if you have a weavermount from 1968 or the better mounts of today.
The idea is just to make a simple chart showing what counts and what just becomes uninteresting when it comes to levelling.
Sometimes people just spend in my opinion to much effort in checking so the scope is perfectly aligned over the bore when setting up the scope, but forget the testfire it for real.
A simple way of testing the correctness of the system is to fire 5 rounds at 100 meters, adjust 10 mils, shoot Another 5 rounds and first check so second Group is perfectly straight over the first Group and secondly at the correct distance betwen them in this case one meter.
opinions please?
Regards Håkan
This is NOT a discussion if bubble levels are needed or expensive instruments when setting up your scope.
It's absolutely not a discussion if you have a weavermount from 1968 or the better mounts of today.
The idea is just to make a simple chart showing what counts and what just becomes uninteresting when it comes to levelling.
Sometimes people just spend in my opinion to much effort in checking so the scope is perfectly aligned over the bore when setting up the scope, but forget the testfire it for real.
A simple way of testing the correctness of the system is to fire 5 rounds at 100 meters, adjust 10 mils, shoot Another 5 rounds and first check so second Group is perfectly straight over the first Group and secondly at the correct distance betwen them in this case one meter.
opinions please?
Regards Håkan